1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...
1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...
1. Nathaniel Bradford of Accomack County, Virginia - Lower ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In 1665, <strong>Nathaniel</strong> was one <strong>of</strong> only three surveyors for <strong>Accomack</strong>, but when appointed again in 1683, he<br />
was one <strong>of</strong> 17. 113 The multiplication <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fice was a clear result <strong>of</strong> the spread <strong>of</strong> settlement within<br />
<strong>Accomack</strong> and the building-up <strong>of</strong> the county’s infrastructure. In addition to their maintenance duties, the<br />
surveyors were also responsible for seeing that new roads were laid out when necessary. It’s tempting to<br />
imagine that during his time as surveyor <strong>Nathaniel</strong> must have overseen the creation <strong>of</strong> a significant number<br />
<strong>of</strong> the county’s roads whose essential routes have remained unchanged to this day; although most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
major roads were probably based on old Indian paths.<br />
As they continued to improve and subdivide their land, landowners sometimes found that the public roads<br />
which ran over their property ran directly contrary to their interests, preventing a more rational use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
land or seeming to divide it arbitrarily. It was sometimes possible in such cases to alter a road, provided one<br />
filed a petition with the court requesting permission to do so. Quite <strong>of</strong>ten, though, a landowner would<br />
simply alter the road without asking permission from the court. Anyone who found the new road to be a<br />
hindrance could then lay a complaint before the court, and if the alteration was found to be detrimental to<br />
the public, the landowner would be ordered to return the road to its previous condition. For instance, in<br />
1674 a complaint was registered before the court against <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s neighbor Richard Kellam for<br />
“[enclosing] an ancient useful road and [denying] the same to be a road.” <strong>Nathaniel</strong> and neighbors John<br />
Smith, Robert Watson and Jonas Jackson, were ordered to determine “whether it had once been used by the<br />
inhabitants and whether it was a necessary road.” <strong>Nathaniel</strong> and the others judged that the old road was<br />
even more necessary than it had been in years past and Kellam was ordered to return the road to its former<br />
condition. 114 <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s son William confronted a similar situation in the year after <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s death,<br />
when he tried to alter the road leading north from Arthur Upshur’s land in Matchapungo Neck. 115<br />
Page 22 <strong>of</strong> 74 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>