3. John Bradford of Somerset County, Maryland (Nathaniel ) - Lower ...

3. John Bradford of Somerset County, Maryland (Nathaniel ) - Lower ... 3. John Bradford of Somerset County, Maryland (Nathaniel ) - Lower ...

delmarvabradfords.com
from delmarvabradfords.com More from this publisher

<strong>3.</strong> <strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Maryland</strong> (<strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1 )<br />

(1677-c.1753)<br />

Page 1 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Contents<br />

1. <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> in Accomack: 1677-1710 3<br />

2. <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> in <strong>Somerset</strong>: 1710-1753 7<br />

<strong>3.</strong> Citations 13<br />

4. Bibliography 15<br />

5. Appendix A: Timeline 16<br />

6. Appendix B: Probate Record Transcriptions 17<br />

Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


<strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong> was born probably around 1677 in Accomack <strong>County</strong>, Virginia, the son <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1 <strong>Bradford</strong> <strong>of</strong> Accomack<br />

by his last wife Joan (Franklin) <strong>Bradford</strong>. <strong>John</strong> married first Tabitha Lecatt, the daughter <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> and Thomasin Lecatt <strong>of</strong><br />

Accomack; by 1740 he was married to Margaret [____]. In 1710 he moved from Accomack to <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Maryland</strong>,<br />

where he died between the writing <strong>of</strong> his final will on 3 September 1742 and its recording on 5 October 175<strong>3.</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong><br />

was the father <strong>of</strong> eleven children: viz, his 3 sons <strong>Nathaniel</strong>, William and <strong>John</strong>, as well as 8 daughters, Tabitha, Susanah,<br />

Comfort, Frances, Rachell, Mary, Rebecca, and Martha.<br />

<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> in Accomack: 1677-1710<br />

<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s Youth<br />

When <strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1 <strong>Bradford</strong> <strong>of</strong> Accomack died in 1690, his son <strong>John</strong> was left an orphan in the care <strong>of</strong> his mother Joan<br />

(Franklin) <strong>Bradford</strong>, who remarried to Thomas Budd between 19 March and 16 June 1691. 1 She and young <strong>John</strong> (then aged<br />

about 14) moved with Budd to settle on land he had recently purchased in northern Accomack. 2 Early the following year, on<br />

16 February 1691/2, <strong>John</strong> 2 appeared in court and chose his step-father as his guardian. 3<br />

On 10 June 1698, <strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong> quit claim to his brother William 2 from all interest in the estate <strong>of</strong> their father.<br />

“Know all men by these presents That I <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> <strong>of</strong> Accomk. <strong>County</strong> youngest son <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> late<br />

<strong>of</strong> ye aforesaid <strong>County</strong> deceased have Remised Released and for ever quit claimed . . . unto my Brother William<br />

<strong>Bradford</strong> son & heir <strong>of</strong> the said <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> . . . . from all manner <strong>of</strong> actions suits debts Bonds & all other<br />

demands wtsoever in relation to ye administracon granted joyntly by ye Court to his Mother Joan <strong>Bradford</strong> & ye<br />

said Wm <strong>Bradford</strong> upon ye said <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>s Estate as to his third pte due to ye sd <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> by Law as<br />

witness my hand & seale this 10 th day <strong>of</strong> June anno Dom 1698. Sealed & delivrd in presence <strong>of</strong> Jno Washbourne,<br />

Susanna [O] Washbourne. Signed <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>. 4<br />

Since <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> quit claim to his father’s estate on 10 June 1698, it may be assumed that he had reached his majority by<br />

this date, which points to a birth date for <strong>John</strong> before 10 June 1677. Further interpretation <strong>of</strong> the records from <strong>John</strong>’s early<br />

years reinforces a birth in 1677. Since <strong>John</strong> chose his own guardian on 16 February 1691/2, he must have been at least 14 at<br />

the time, which would put his birth date before 16 February 1678 – basically in line with the estimate obtained from his quit<br />

claim. Depending on how much weight one attaches to it, another record from 1698 may allow a further narrowing <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong>’s<br />

birth date. The following abstract comes from the 7 April 1698 court <strong>of</strong> Accomack <strong>County</strong>:<br />

“<strong>John</strong> Read had been bound over to this court at the suit <strong>of</strong> Capt.<br />

Thomas Welburne (a justice <strong>of</strong> the peace) at the complaint <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong><br />

<strong>Bradford</strong>, who suspected Read <strong>of</strong> “causing proclamation to be made<br />

for the said <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s appearance, being bound over by<br />

recognizance to prosecute, as also the said <strong>John</strong> Read being likewise<br />

bound over to answer.” In open court proclamation was made for all<br />

persons that could to give evidence; since no one appeared to prove<br />

the information, <strong>John</strong> Read was acquitted with <strong>Bradford</strong> paying<br />

court costs.” 5<br />

It is notable that <strong>John</strong>’s suit was brought by Capt. Thomas Welburne rather than himself. This might indicate that <strong>John</strong> was<br />

not yet 21 at the time, since minors were not allowed to bring suit in their own name. If this interpretation is correct it<br />

establishes <strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong>’s date <strong>of</strong> birth as being some time between 7 April and 10 June 1677. Even if this specific<br />

estimate is <strong>of</strong>f, 1677 still stands as the most probable year <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong>’s birth. Whether one extrapolates <strong>John</strong>’s age from the date<br />

on which he chose his guardian or the date on which he quit claim, both point to around 1677 as the last possible year <strong>of</strong> his<br />

birth. This consistency probably indicates that he was taking advantage <strong>of</strong> his rights at precisely the times he acquired them<br />

by law.<br />

Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


<strong>John</strong> Receives Grant <strong>of</strong> Land<br />

Four months after signing the release <strong>of</strong> rights to his brother, on 4 October 1698 <strong>John</strong> 2 ’s step-father Thomas Budd granted<br />

<strong>John</strong> 364 acres <strong>of</strong> his own property on Assawoman Creek, and Joan (Franklin) <strong>Bradford</strong> Budd released her dower interest in<br />

the land. The deed was a grant, since no money was involved. It wasn’t unusual for a step-father to grant land to his step-son,<br />

but perhaps one <strong>of</strong> the “divers considerations” Thomas Budd had in mind was the extremely open-ended quit claim <strong>John</strong><br />

gave him the same day: 6<br />

“I <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> . . . for ever quit claime unto Thomas Budd . . . for all manner <strong>of</strong> actions Suites Quarrels Debts<br />

Duties Bonds Bills writings Obligatory Recknings accompts and Demands whatsoever wch against the said Thomas<br />

Budd ever I had now have, or which I my Heires Executors or admrators or any <strong>of</strong> us at any tyme hereafter shall or<br />

may have for or by Reason or meanes <strong>of</strong> any matter Cause or thing whatsoever from the beginning <strong>of</strong> the world until<br />

the day <strong>of</strong> ye date <strong>of</strong> these presents.”<br />

Though <strong>John</strong>’s release to his brother was dated 10 June, it wasn’t acknowledged in open court until 4 October, the same date<br />

as his release to Thomas Budd as well as Budd’s land grant and Joan Budd’s release <strong>of</strong> dower. All three latter instruments<br />

were witnessed by Wm. White Junr. and <strong>John</strong> Lecat Junr. 7<br />

<strong>John</strong>’s Instruments Recorded<br />

Sidebar: Origins <strong>of</strong> Thomas Budd<br />

Thomas Budd seems to have first moved to Accomack around the time <strong>of</strong> his purchase <strong>of</strong> land from <strong>John</strong><br />

Stockley, as it is only at this time that he first appears in the records <strong>of</strong> the county. 8 He does not appear to<br />

be the same Thomas Budd who in 1656 appeared with <strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong>’s father and others as a subscriber to<br />

the petition to reinstate the Reverend Thomas Teackle. 9 Before Thomas Budd’s appearance in 1691 as the<br />

husband <strong>of</strong> Joan (Franklin) <strong>Bradford</strong>, the last mention <strong>of</strong> a Thomas Budd in the records <strong>of</strong> the eastern shore<br />

was on 1 May 1660, in Northampton <strong>County</strong> court:<br />

“Upon ye humble peticon <strong>of</strong> Mr Hugh Yeo concerning Thomas Budd, who is at present in a<br />

distracted Condition, desireing ye Court would provide for him, The Court takeing ye prmises into<br />

Consideration Order yt Mr Hodgkins high Sherr shall provide for him that hee neither do hurt to<br />

himselfe or other, And yt ye sd Mr Hodgkins bee paid out <strong>of</strong> ye publique.” 10<br />

The record is vague on specifics but hints that this earlier Budd may have been suffering from some form<br />

<strong>of</strong> mental illness. The later Thomas Budd may be this man’s son, but there is no record <strong>of</strong> a relationship. It<br />

is also not known if either <strong>of</strong> these Thomas Budds were related to Capt. Richard Budd <strong>of</strong> Northumberland<br />

<strong>County</strong>, Virginia, who died around 1659. 11 The existence <strong>of</strong> a Budd in Northumberland <strong>County</strong> is notable<br />

because Joan’s brother Henry Franklin lived in that county and because the younger Thomas Budd appears<br />

to have lived outside Accomack before 1691.<br />

* * * * *<br />

Differing Fates <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> and William <strong>Bradford</strong><br />

In the 1704 quit rent roll <strong>of</strong> Accomack <strong>County</strong>, <strong>John</strong> 2 was listed with the 364 acres granted him by Thomas Budd. 12 Unlike<br />

his brother William 2 , whose 3500 acres placed him among the top ten landholders in the county, <strong>John</strong>’s holdings placed him<br />

in the median range <strong>of</strong> landholdings. Out <strong>of</strong> 388 entities paying quit rents on property in Accomack, <strong>John</strong> ranked 188 th . It’s<br />

worth considering how different <strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong>’s fate might have been had his father left a will. When he died, <strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1<br />

<strong>Bradford</strong> was possessed <strong>of</strong> 2400 acres in Matchipungo Neck, 500 acres on Pungoteague and 1600 acres in Sussex <strong>County</strong>,<br />

Delaware, at that time part <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania. During the entire time his eldest son <strong>Nathaniel</strong> 2 Jr. was alive, <strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1 Sr.<br />

Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


etained him in Accomack while his next eldest son, William 2 , managed the plantation in Sussex. After the death <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong> 2 Jr., William 2 returned to Accomack, but <strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1 Sr. kept the Sussex plantation in his ownership. All this time<br />

<strong>John</strong> 2 was still a minor. It’s tempting to believe that if <strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1 Sr. had lived until <strong>John</strong> 2 came <strong>of</strong> age, he might have sent<br />

him to look after the Sussex plantation and perhaps reserved it for him as his inheritance. Instead, <strong>John</strong>’s brother sold the<br />

plantation a year or so after their father’s death. Even if <strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1 ’s intention was to sell his Sussex land and to reserve his<br />

entire home plantation for his eldest son, at the very least one would expect <strong>John</strong> to have received the 500 acres at<br />

Pungoteague – yet due to his father’s intestate death <strong>John</strong> received nothing.<br />

It’s not clear how close the two half-brothers were to each other. <strong>John</strong>’s release to William is the only record in which the<br />

two <strong>of</strong> them appear together. Since William spent most <strong>of</strong> the 1680s in Sussex <strong>County</strong>, it’s safe to say that he was not around<br />

for much <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong>’s childhood. William went to Sussex in 1683, when <strong>John</strong> was 6, and returned in 1688. From the ages <strong>of</strong> 11<br />

to 13, <strong>John</strong> lived in the same house with William, but after his father’s death he moved in with his step-father. For over a<br />

decade after <strong>John</strong> came <strong>of</strong> age, he and William both lived in Accomack, but <strong>John</strong>’s home was in another section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

county, about 25 to 30 miles north <strong>of</strong> William.<br />

* * * * *<br />

Marriage to Tabitha Lecatt<br />

It was probably around the time <strong>of</strong> Budd’s grant <strong>of</strong> land to him that <strong>John</strong> married Tabitha Lecatt, the daughter <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> Lecatt<br />

<strong>of</strong> Accomack. It was common for parents or step-parents to deed land to their children when they set out to start a family <strong>of</strong><br />

their own, and this may have been the case with <strong>John</strong>. The fact that Tabitha’s brother, <strong>John</strong> Lecatt Jr., witnessed the grant<br />

from Thomas Budd further supports this theory. Tabitha and <strong>John</strong> had at least two children by the time her father wrote his<br />

will on 1 December 1702, which would make a marriage date around 1698 quite plausible.<br />

LECATT, JOHN – 1 Dec 1702 – 2 March 1702/3 – To dau Tabitha & to her dau Susanna & her son <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

<strong>Bradford</strong>. To son <strong>John</strong>. To grandson Augustin Lecatt. Wife Tomasin. To dau Elizabeth. To the children <strong>of</strong> my dau<br />

Mary that she had by <strong>John</strong> Taylor. Wife Exec. Witt: Robert Hutchinson, Richard Rogers, Joseph Milby 13<br />

Sidebar: <strong>John</strong> and Thomasin Lecatt<br />

Tabitha’s father <strong>John</strong> Lecatt was born around 1642, whether in Virginia or elsewhere is unknown. His first<br />

appearance in the records <strong>of</strong> Accomack comes on 16 July 1663, when he gave a deposition stating his age<br />

and the fact that he was the servant <strong>of</strong> “my Dame Milby.” 14 <strong>John</strong> may have been French, as the signature on<br />

his deposition reads “Jean Le Cat”.<br />

“Dame Milby” was Thomasin Milby, the wife <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> Milby <strong>of</strong> Accomack, who fell ill from the flux (i.e.,<br />

dysentary) and died in March or April 1672. 15 Thomasin was not mentioned by name in her husband’s will,<br />

though <strong>John</strong> Milby did write that she “hath been a very cruel wife unto me and hath been in court once<br />

about it already, and since that time hath used me very barbarously, and hath had a child by another man,<br />

which was born 22 October last.” <strong>John</strong> Milby left it for the court to decide whether his wife should have an<br />

inheritance and whether the child would be his heir. Within a month after <strong>John</strong> Milby’s death, Thomasin<br />

had remarried to former servant <strong>John</strong> Lecatt, doubtless also the father <strong>of</strong> the child born 22 October 1671<br />

and referred to by <strong>John</strong> Milby in his will. 16 (It is unknown whether this child is Tabitha.) Thomasin Milby<br />

Lecatt’s maiden name is unknown. She was born around 1633, making her nearly a decade older than <strong>John</strong><br />

Lecatt. 17<br />

<strong>John</strong> Lecatt was a constable <strong>of</strong> Accomack county from 1677 to 1681, but was removed from <strong>of</strong>fice in the<br />

latter year for delinquency in carrying out his duties. 18 He was appointed a constable again in 1692, but<br />

petitioned to be discharged in 1696. 19 He served on the grand juries held in Accomack <strong>County</strong> in the years<br />

1669, 1673, 1674, 1683 and 1696, 20 and on a handful <strong>of</strong> regular juries in Accomack. In addition to their<br />

daughter Tabitha who married <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>, <strong>John</strong> and Thomasin Lecatt had four other children: Phillip<br />

Alexander Lecatt 21 and <strong>John</strong> Lecatt, who married Mary and Patience, respectively, the daughters <strong>of</strong><br />

Rowland Savage; 22 also two other daughters, Mary and Elizabeth Lecatt, the former <strong>of</strong> whom married <strong>John</strong><br />

Taylor. <strong>John</strong> Lecatt, Sr. died in the winter <strong>of</strong> 1702-1703, sometime between 1 December and 2 March. 23<br />

Thomasin Lecatt died some time before 2 May 1711, when her son-in-law Richard Savage was granted<br />

administration on her estate. 24<br />

Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Other Records <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> in Accomack <strong>County</strong><br />

Probate Records<br />

<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> appeared in a few other records in Accomack before he moved from the county. On 17 June 1697 he was a<br />

witness to the will <strong>of</strong> Elizabeth Stratton, the widow <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> Stratton, whom she had remarried after the death <strong>of</strong> her first<br />

husband <strong>John</strong> Stockley. 25 <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> also proved Elizabeth’s will in court on 6 August 1707. 26 The Strattons and<br />

Stockleys were neighbors <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>.<br />

<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> witnessed and proved two other wills in Accomack <strong>County</strong>. On 5 June 1705 <strong>John</strong> proved the will <strong>of</strong> Hendrick<br />

<strong>John</strong>son, which he had witnessed on 27 February <strong>of</strong> the same year; 27 and on 2 August 1709 he proved the will <strong>of</strong> Thomas<br />

Taylor, which he had witnessed on 25 October 1707. 28 One other probate record from Accomack county involved <strong>John</strong><br />

<strong>Bradford</strong>. On 2 February 1708/9 he and William Welk were security for Catherine Price’s administration <strong>of</strong> the estate <strong>of</strong> her<br />

deceased husband Richard Price. 29<br />

Witness<br />

<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> was twice paid for serving as a witness in other mens’ suits before the court. In the first suit, brought on 2 June<br />

1703, <strong>John</strong> attended seven days as a witness for Charles Venetson in an action brought by Capt. Bennet Scarburgh and his<br />

wife Temperance “for words,” probably a defamation suit. 30 No doubt the Scarburghs felt they had been disparaged by<br />

Vanetson, who felt that <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> would be able to speak in his favor. <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> was also ordered to be paid by <strong>John</strong><br />

Blake for serving as a witness in a suit <strong>of</strong> debt he brought against Charles Taylor on 4 August 1708. 31<br />

Servant William Brian<br />

On 6 March 1704/5 <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s servant William Brian petitioned that <strong>John</strong> was detaining him past the expiration <strong>of</strong> his<br />

indenture. 32 A month later, on 4 April, <strong>John</strong> answered the court’s summons and produced Brian’s indenture, which proved<br />

the complaint false. William Brian was not only ordered to return to <strong>John</strong>’s service, but to serve him longer than his original<br />

indenture as recompense. 33<br />

Jury Service<br />

<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> served on two grand juries sworn for Accomack county, in the years 1700 and 1706. 34<br />

<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s Grand Jury service from 1706<br />

<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> also served once as a regular juror in a trial that is interesting for the details it reveals about the lives <strong>of</strong><br />

servants in this period. 35 On 4 April 1705 Lt. Col. Tully Robinson brought suit against William Scott, accusing him <strong>of</strong> “trade<br />

& truck” with Robinson’s servant woman Sarah Fitchpatrick. By a law enacted 23 March 1662 harsh penalties were laid<br />

down for those who would “buy, sell, trade or truck with any servant for any commodity.” Those found guilty <strong>of</strong> this <strong>of</strong>fense<br />

were harshly penalized. Not only did they receive an automatic sentence <strong>of</strong> a month’s imprisonment without bail, but they<br />

also had to post a bond for their good behavior and pay the servant’s master four times the value <strong>of</strong> the thing they had<br />

bargained for. Robinson was now in court demanding Scott’s imprisonment plus 2000 lbs tobacco, “being four times ye value<br />

<strong>of</strong> 500 lbs tobacco.” The jury heard evidence which included the servant Sarah Fitchpatrick’s deposition, plus a bill signed by<br />

William Scott for 500 lbs tobacco to Sarah. It took <strong>John</strong> and the other jurors all day to reach their verdict, which was in favor<br />

<strong>of</strong> Robinson.<br />

Page 6 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> in Somserset: 1710-1753<br />

Move from Accomack to <strong>Somerset</strong><br />

On 1 October 1706, in a deed witnessed by Henry Towles Junr and Charles Leatherbury, <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> sold <strong>John</strong> Murraign<br />

64 acres <strong>of</strong> the land he had been granted by Thomas Budd. 36 The deed was for “diverse good Causes & Consideracons” but<br />

no sum was mentioned, so it’s unclear what <strong>John</strong> received in return. His wife Tabitha released her dower interest in the land<br />

on the same day in an instrument witnessed by Henry Towles Junr and Charles Trelfoo. 37 On the same day Charles Trelfoo,<br />

the witness to Tabitha’s dower release, purchased land from Thomas Budd. 38 The deed from Budd to Trelfoo contains pro<strong>of</strong><br />

that Joan (Franklin) <strong>Bradford</strong> Budd had passed away before the date it was signed, since Budd’s second wife Ann Donella<br />

relinquished her dower to his land. Ann Donella was the daughter <strong>of</strong> Thomas Middleton <strong>of</strong> Accomack. 39<br />

Four years after his sale <strong>of</strong> 64 acres to Murraigne, in a deed dated 7 February 1710, <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> sold the remainder <strong>of</strong> his<br />

holdings in Accomack to Thomas Nock in a deed witnessed by Wm. Nock Junr. and <strong>John</strong> <strong>John</strong>son. 40 He received 15,000 lbs<br />

<strong>of</strong> tobacco and a mare for his land. Later in the same year, no doubt using the money raised from this sale, <strong>John</strong> purchased<br />

land in <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Maryland</strong>. By a deed dated 8 November 1710, he acquired the 300-acre tract Saint Martins Desert<br />

from William Townsend for 5,500 lbs tobacco. 41<br />

In 1716, <strong>John</strong> received other land in <strong>Somerset</strong> on assignment from <strong>John</strong> Caldwell Jr. - a 50-acre tract called <strong>John</strong>’s Lot<br />

located next to St. Martin’s Desert. 42<br />

Sidebar: When Did Tabitha (Lecatt) <strong>Bradford</strong> Die?<br />

There is no mention <strong>of</strong> the given name <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s wife between Tabitha’s release <strong>of</strong> dower to <strong>John</strong><br />

Murraigne in 1706 and <strong>John</strong>’s naming <strong>of</strong> his wife Margaret in his will <strong>of</strong> 1740. Sometime within this 34year<br />

time span Tabitha must have died and <strong>John</strong> must have remarried to Margaret, but it is unclear when<br />

either <strong>of</strong> these events might have happened. It may be significant that Tabitha did not appear in 1710 to<br />

release her dower interest to <strong>John</strong> Nock in her husband’s deed to him. This may indicate that she had died<br />

Page 7 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


y that year, since she did release her dower interest in the previous deed to <strong>John</strong> Murraine. If she did die<br />

before 1710, it is still unclear whether <strong>John</strong> was later wed only to Margaret or whether he had another wife<br />

or wives intervening. If Tabitha died between 1706 and 1710, it might go a long way towards explaining<br />

<strong>John</strong>’s move out <strong>of</strong> the county. His mother had also died sometime before 1706. If his relations with his<br />

half-brother were distant, there would be little keeping him in Accomack and perhaps much incentive to<br />

seek out a fresh start in a new place.<br />

* * * * *<br />

Depositions in Northumberland <strong>County</strong><br />

It is thanks to two depositions recorded in Northumberland <strong>County</strong>, Virginia, that we know the maiden name <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong><br />

<strong>Bradford</strong>’s mother. These depositions were recorded in relation to the estate <strong>of</strong> Henry Franklin, who is identified as a natural<br />

brother to Joan <strong>Bradford</strong>. <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> apparently had some basis to lay claim to his uncle Henry’s land in Northumberland<br />

<strong>County</strong>, as evidenced by several items recorded in that county during the year 171<strong>3.</strong> Henry Franklin’s widow Hannah had<br />

remarried to Richard Russell after Henry’s death in 1700 or 1701. 43 Russell himself died within a decade and Hannah<br />

remarried again to a certain Thomas Smith before 19 July 1711, the date on which Smith re-recorded Henry Franklin’s will in<br />

Northumberland court. 44 Since this is just a year after <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s liquidation <strong>of</strong> his Accomack property and his<br />

relocation to Somesert, it’s tempting to think that Thomas Smith re-recorded the will to bolster his case against a claim laid to<br />

Henry Franklin’s property by <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>.<br />

The matter was resolved in 1713 with <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s release to Thomas Smith <strong>of</strong> his rights to Henry Franklin’s 400-acre<br />

estate “in the parish <strong>of</strong> Saint Stephens” for 7,000 lbs tobacco. 45 It can’t be said for certain on what date <strong>John</strong> signed his<br />

release since the date on the release itself is unreadable, but it was recorded in the summer <strong>of</strong> 1713 and definitely written in<br />

the period from 1710 to 1713, since <strong>John</strong> is described as being from <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Maryland</strong>. That same summer,<br />

Thomas Smith presented in Northumberland Court two depositions relating to Henry Franklin and his estate. The intent <strong>of</strong><br />

the depositions seems tw<strong>of</strong>old: to prove whether or not Joan (Franklin) <strong>Bradford</strong> was in fact Henry Franklin’s natural sister,<br />

and also to clarify what Henry’s intentions were regarding his land and whether it should be conveyed to his sister’s son. In<br />

his will, Henry bequeathed his estate to his wife Hannah for life, since he had no lineal heirs <strong>of</strong> his own, and after her death to<br />

Richard and Henry White, the sons <strong>of</strong> Joseph White <strong>of</strong> Newmans Neck. 46 However, apparently at some point before he died<br />

Henry had expressed an intention to convey his land to his nephew, <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>.<br />

In Hannah Smith’s deposition, she relates how <strong>Nathaniel</strong> 1 <strong>Bradford</strong> came to Henry Franklin’s house and invited him to come<br />

see his sister Joan, now <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s wife. Henry accepted the invitation, and he and Hannah crossed the bay and landed at<br />

Charles Scarburgh’s plantation, then proceeded to one <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s plantations (probably the plantation at Pungoteague)<br />

where they lingered for a time while <strong>Nathaniel</strong> sent horses for them. When they finally arrived that evening at <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s<br />

house at Matchipungo, Joan came out and she and Henry recognized each other as siblings. In her deposition, Hannah stated<br />

that before Henry’s death he asked Nicholas Seaburn to write his sister asking her to send her son to him and that “he would<br />

leave him all his estate when he died, but had no return and therefore the said Frankling said he thought they slighted his<br />

kindness and therefore he would devise his estate otherwise.” 47<br />

The other deposition, from James White, is worth quoting in full:<br />

“The Deposition <strong>of</strong> White [sic] Aged Fifty three years or thereabout Sworn & Examined Said That he was Very well<br />

acquainted with Henry Frankling decd late Inhabitant <strong>of</strong> this <strong>County</strong> on the head <strong>of</strong> Great Wicocomoco River [and<br />

did] formerly hear the said Henry Frankling Say that he had a Sister in Colony And afterwards One <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

<strong>Bradford</strong> an Inhabitant <strong>of</strong> Accomack <strong>County</strong> Coming into this <strong>County</strong> the said <strong>Nathaniel</strong> & Henry had [unreadable<br />

word] Conferrance and whereupon the Said <strong>Nathaniel</strong> after Such discourse Concerning that he the said <strong>Bradford</strong>s<br />

wife was Sister to the said Henry) wanted him and [unreadable] to his house in Accomack aforesaid and accordingly<br />

the said Hen: with his wife went with the said Bradfor & as they Informed this Deponant were at his house there<br />

And this Depon being Since at the Said <strong>Bradford</strong>s house did See the said <strong>Bradford</strong>s wife & heard her Say that the<br />

said Henry Frankling & his wife were there & the Said Henry was her Naturall Brother and that they acknowledged<br />

Such lawfully kindred to Each other and this Depont. also hath <strong>of</strong>ten heard the said Henry Say Since his Return from<br />

thence that His said <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>s wife was his Naturall & lawfull Sister And further this Deponant Saith that<br />

hearing the said Henry discourse <strong>of</strong> [devising?] his Estate he Said he had a kinsman Named Jno. <strong>Bradford</strong> his said<br />

Sisters Sone as aforesaid to whome he was Inclinable to give his Estate But the said Jno not behaving himself<br />

Suitable to his desire has [grown?] to be distasted therefore & left him Nothing in his will and further this Deponant<br />

Saith that he heard the said Henry Frankling Say his Said Sisters Name was Jone . . .Augt 17 1713” 48<br />

Page 8 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Sidebar: Henry and Joan Franklin<br />

There is no record <strong>of</strong> Henry Franklin’s transportation to Virginia in the patent books, 49 but a Joane<br />

Frankling is listed as a headright <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> Robins <strong>of</strong> Northampton <strong>County</strong> in a patent granted him on 1674. 50<br />

It is possible this Joan Franklin was the same woman as the sister <strong>of</strong> Henry Franklin and wife <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

<strong>Bradford</strong>. In James White’s deposition, the facts seem to imply that Joan had come to Virginia separately<br />

from Henry, and that the two had not seen each other in a long time. If she was <strong>John</strong> Robins’ headright<br />

from 1674, then she would have been transported probably around 1671 or before. 51 If she came into<br />

Virginia in 1671 without indenture she would have served Robins or his assignee for five years, the custom<br />

<strong>of</strong> the country, becoming a free woman around 1676 – a date consistent with a marriage to <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

<strong>Bradford</strong> around 1677.<br />

* * * * *<br />

A fair amount <strong>of</strong> evidence has survived relating to <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s time in Accomack, mainly thanks to the survival <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Accomack court order books, which a variety <strong>of</strong> actions were recorded, many <strong>of</strong> them filled with interesting details.<br />

However, from <strong>John</strong>’s life in <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong> almost the only pertinent surviving records are the will books and the deed<br />

books. The one exception to this paucity is the series <strong>of</strong> <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong> tax lists.<br />

<strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong> Tax Lists 52<br />

The tax lists <strong>of</strong> <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Maryland</strong> have survived for the years 1723 to 1759, although the occasional year is missing<br />

and a few <strong>of</strong> the lists are incomplete. In 1742, Worcester <strong>County</strong> was created from <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong>, and <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s<br />

land was located in the new county. Thus he only appears on the tax lists through the year 1740 (the lists for 1741 and 1742<br />

are missing). These lists are vital for determining the birth order <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong>’s three sons and also the probable years <strong>of</strong> their<br />

birth, based on the fact that free white males were only taxed after the age <strong>of</strong> fifteen.<br />

The tax lists <strong>of</strong> <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong> were taken in<br />

the summer by the constables for each district,<br />

in this case the hundred. As administrative units<br />

hundreds had been around in England since the<br />

middle ages, and their use was carried over into<br />

certain <strong>of</strong> the American colonies, including<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong>. (The hundreds <strong>of</strong> <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

are depicted at left in a map created by <strong>John</strong> C.<br />

Lyon and posted on the USGenWeb website for<br />

<strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong>.) Each hundred had a<br />

constable and an overseer <strong>of</strong> the roads (the<br />

counterpart <strong>of</strong> the Virginian surveyor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

highways) assigned to it. In the years his family<br />

appears on the tax lists, <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> was<br />

always listed in Bogerternorton Hundred, where<br />

St. Martin’s Desert was located; his sons<br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong> and William variously appeared in<br />

either Bogerternorton or Baltimore hundreds.<br />

Page 9 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Chart Indicating <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> Family on <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong> Tax Lists<br />

Year Details<br />

1723-1725 <strong>John</strong> in Bogerternorton w/ dependent <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

1727 <strong>John</strong> in B’norton w/dep. William; <strong>Nathaniel</strong> dep. <strong>of</strong> Warren Hadder<br />

1728 B’norton tax list does not survive<br />

1729 <strong>John</strong> and William not on tax list; <strong>Nathaniel</strong> dep. <strong>of</strong> Warren Hadder, B’norton<br />

1730 <strong>John</strong> in B’norton w/dep. William; <strong>Nathaniel</strong> head <strong>of</strong> household, B’norton<br />

1731 <strong>John</strong> in B’norton; <strong>Nathaniel</strong> not listed; William head <strong>of</strong> household, Baltimore hundred<br />

1733 <strong>John</strong> in B’norton; William head <strong>of</strong> household, B’norton; <strong>Nathaniel</strong> head, Baltimore<br />

1734-1739 <strong>John</strong> in B’norton; William and <strong>Nathaniel</strong> heads <strong>of</strong> household, Baltimore hundred<br />

1740 <strong>John</strong> in B’norton w/dep. <strong>John</strong>; William head, Baltimore; <strong>Nathaniel</strong> head, B’norton<br />

Sidebar: Adam <strong>Bradford</strong><br />

Other than <strong>John</strong> and his sons <strong>Nathaniel</strong>, William, and <strong>John</strong>, just one other “<strong>Bradford</strong>” appears on the<br />

<strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong> Tax Lists. A man named Adam is enumerated in several <strong>of</strong> the years, with his surname<br />

variously written as Bredfoott, Brawfoot, <strong>Bradford</strong>, and Braford. He is undoubtedly the Adam Brawford<br />

whose estate was inventoried in <strong>Somerset</strong> and recorded on 16 August 1742. 53 At that time, it was noted that<br />

none <strong>of</strong> his kinsmen were in the county. From that, and the fact that he is not mentioned in <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s<br />

1740 will, we may conclude that he was not related.<br />

* * * * *<br />

<strong>John</strong>’s Neighborhood<br />

<strong>John</strong> C. Lyon was able to determine the rough location <strong>of</strong> St. Martins Desert within Worcester <strong>County</strong>. It was located west<br />

<strong>of</strong> Berlin and just east <strong>of</strong> Pocomoke River, in the area <strong>of</strong> present-day Libertytown. 54<br />

Approximate location <strong>of</strong> St. Martin’s Desert and <strong>John</strong>’s Lot<br />

Page 10 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


<strong>John</strong>’s Wills<br />

On 5 October 1753 <strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong>’s will was recorded for probate in<br />

Worcester <strong>County</strong>. 55 He divided his land into 3 portions for his three sons<br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong> 3 , William 3 , and <strong>John</strong> 3 . <strong>Nathaniel</strong> 3 was to have that part <strong>of</strong> St. Martins<br />

Desert south <strong>of</strong> “Joseph Jones Road” (probably the present-day Purnells<br />

Crossing road which runs through Libertytown) and William 3 received a<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> what was left <strong>of</strong> St. Martins Desert north <strong>of</strong> the road. <strong>John</strong> 3 was also<br />

to receive 50 acres <strong>of</strong> St. Martins Desert out <strong>of</strong> the section north <strong>of</strong> the road<br />

plus the 50 acre-tract <strong>John</strong>’s Lot. Each son also received a pewter dish. <strong>John</strong> 2<br />

bequeathed the rest <strong>of</strong> his “moveables” to his wife Margaret and instructed that<br />

his “goods and chattels” were to be divided equally between his 8 daughters,<br />

none <strong>of</strong> whom he named. Three depositions relating to <strong>John</strong> 2 ’s will were<br />

recorded along with it in Worcester <strong>County</strong>. Two <strong>of</strong> them, from Joseph Jones<br />

and <strong>John</strong> Holloway, had to do with settling the divisional line between<br />

<strong>Nathaniel</strong> 3 ’s and William 3 ’s portions <strong>of</strong> St. Martins Desert. The third<br />

deposition was from Rebecca 3 Smith, a daughter <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong>; she<br />

testified to the fact that Robert Rathbone and George Jarman had witnessed<br />

<strong>John</strong> 2 ’s will on 3 September 1742, since the two had died between then and<br />

175<strong>3.</strong> 56<br />

The names <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong>’s daughters are revealed in a will he had written two years before the one recorded in<br />

Worcester <strong>County</strong>. This earlier will was dated 4 February 1739/40 and was recorded in <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong>. 57<br />

When <strong>John</strong> 2 wrote this earlier will Worcester <strong>County</strong> had not yet been created out <strong>of</strong> <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong> so it was recorded in<br />

the latter county, and an original copy survives at the <strong>Maryland</strong> Archives. <strong>John</strong> names all eight <strong>of</strong> his daughters: Tabitha,<br />

Susanah, Comfort, Francis, Rachell, Mary, Rebeca & Martha. He also notes that Rebeca and Martha are his two youngest<br />

daughters. Since they are listed last in the <strong>John</strong>’s enumeration <strong>of</strong> his daughters, it seems probable that <strong>John</strong> listed his<br />

daughters in order <strong>of</strong> birth, just as he listed his sons in order <strong>of</strong> birth when disposing <strong>of</strong> his land to them in both wills. 58<br />

All the probate records relating to <strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong>, including the inventory and distribution <strong>of</strong> his estate, are transcribed in<br />

Appendix B.<br />

* * * * *<br />

<strong>John</strong> 2 <strong>Bradford</strong> was born around 1677 in Accomack <strong>County</strong>, Virginia and died in Worcester <strong>County</strong>, <strong>Maryland</strong>, between the<br />

writing <strong>of</strong> his will on 3 September 1742 and it’s presentment to the court on 5 October 175<strong>3.</strong><br />

<strong>John</strong> 2 wed first Tabitha Lecatt, probably around 1698, and they were parents <strong>of</strong> the following children:<br />

+ 16*. i. NATHANIEL 3 BRADFORD<br />

17. ii. TABITHA 3 BRADFORD. Married ____ Alford. 59<br />

+ 18. iii. SUSANAH 3 BRADFORD. Married Aaron Timmons. 60<br />

81. i. EDY 4 TIMMONS<br />

82. ii. DRITER 4 TIMMONS<br />

8<strong>3.</strong> iii. RODAY 4 TIMMONS<br />

84. iv. WILLIAM 4 TIMMONS<br />

85. v. ELIZABETH 4 TIMMONS<br />

The mother <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong>’s children can not be determined with certainty, and may be Tabitha, Margaret, or possibly<br />

some intervening wife whose existence is unknown:<br />

+ 19*. iv. WILLIAM 3 BRADFORD<br />

+ 20*. v. JOHN 3 BRADFORD<br />

Page 11 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


21. vi. COMFORT 3 BRADFORD. Married possibly George Davis or Warren Hadder. 61<br />

+ 22. vii. FRANCES 3 BRADFORD. Married <strong>John</strong> Holloway, 27 January 17__. 62<br />

89. i. ESTHER 4 HOLLOWAY. Born 13 March 173_.<br />

90. ii. JOHN 4 HOLLOWAY. Born 8 August 173_.<br />

91. iii. MARY 4 HOLLOWAY. Born 12 January 1739/40.<br />

92. iv. WILLIAM 4 HOLLOWAY. Born 13 March 1742.<br />

9<strong>3.</strong> v. SOLOMON 4 HOLLOWAY. Born 30 March 1744.<br />

94. vi. REBECAH 4 HOLLOWAY. Born 1 January 1747.<br />

95. vii. BARSHEBA 4 HOLLOWAY. Born 13 January 1749.<br />

96. viii. LEDA 4 HOLLOWAY. Born 3 December 1751.<br />

97. ix. ELIJAH 4 HOLLOWAY. Born 11 March 1754.<br />

2<strong>3.</strong> viii. RACHELL 3 BRADFORD. Married possibly George Davis or Warren Hadder. 63<br />

+ 24. ix. MARY 3 BRADFORD. Married Nehemiah Truitt (died before 2 July 1773). 64<br />

98. i. WILLIAM 4 TRUITT<br />

99. ii. NEHEMIAH 4 TRUITT. Born 13 February 175?.<br />

100. iii. _____ 4 TRUITT<br />

101. iv. _____ 4 TRUITT<br />

102. v. _____ 4 TRUITT<br />

25. x. REBECCA 3 BRADFORD. Married ____ Smith. 65<br />

26. xi. MARTHA 3 BRADFORD. Married possibly George Davis or Warren Hadder. 66<br />

Page 12 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Source Citations<br />

1.JoAnn Riley McKey, Accomack <strong>County</strong>, Virginia Court Order Abstracts, Electronic Edition (Bowie, <strong>Maryland</strong>:<br />

Heritage Books, Inc., 2001); 8: 31 & 35.<br />

2.Ralph T. Whitelaw, Virginia’s Eastern Shore (Maine: Picton Press,2001), 1227.<br />

<strong>3.</strong>McKey, 8: 66.<br />

4.Accomack <strong>County</strong> Wills & Deeds, 1692-1715 Part 1, FHL micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 30010, ps.350 [typescript copy]<br />

5.McKey, 9: 24.<br />

6.Accomack <strong>County</strong> Wills & Deeds, 1692-1715 Part 1, FHL micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 30010, ps.349-350. [typescript copy]. These pages<br />

contain <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s releases to his brother and to Budd, as well as Budd’s sale <strong>of</strong> land to <strong>John</strong> and Joan’s release <strong>of</strong> dower.<br />

7.The image is from Accomack <strong>County</strong> Order Books 1676-1678, 1690-1709, FHL micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 30111. Abstract may be<br />

found in McKey, 9: 38.<br />

8.Search for evidence <strong>of</strong> Thomas Budd on the eastern shore was carried on mainly in the court order books <strong>of</strong> Accomack<br />

and Northampton Counties. Prior to his purchase <strong>of</strong> land, he is not mentioned in any <strong>of</strong> the major secondary sources for the<br />

shore.<br />

9.Dr. Howard Mackey and Marlene Alma Hinkley Groves, CG, editors, Northampton <strong>County</strong> Virginia Record Book<br />

Orders, Deeds, Wills &c. Volume 5, 1654-1655 (Rockport, Maine: Picton Press, 1999), 199.<br />

10.Dr. Howard Mackey and Marlene Alma Hinkley Groves, CG, editors, Northampton <strong>County</strong> Virginia Record Book<br />

Orders, Deeds, Wills &c. Volume 8, 1657-1664 (Rockport, Maine: Picton Press, 2002), 112.<br />

11.Beverly Fleet, editor, Virginia Colonial Abstracts Vol. XIX, Northumbria collectanea (Baltimore: Genealogical<br />

Publishing Company, 1971), 17; also Carolyn H. Jett, Records <strong>of</strong> Northumberland <strong>County</strong>, Virginia (Bowie, Md: Heritage<br />

Books, 1994), 159.<br />

12.1704 quit rent roll for Accomack was found on the Accomack <strong>County</strong> genweb site:<br />

http://ftp.rootsweb.com/pub/usgenweb/va/accomack/census/1704rent.txt.<br />

1<strong>3.</strong>Stratton Nottingham, Wills and Administrations <strong>of</strong> Accomack <strong>County</strong>, Virginia 1663-1800 (Baltimore: Genealogical<br />

Publishing Company, 1999), 3<strong>3.</strong><br />

14.McKey, 1: 20.<br />

15.McKey, 3: 6<strong>3.</strong><br />

16.McKey, 3: 57, 112. <strong>John</strong> Milby’s sons – <strong>John</strong>, Joseph, and Samuel – were under 18 when he died. (Nottingham, 5)<br />

They were probably brought up in the Lecatt household and were close with their half-siblings. Depositions from a 1682 suit<br />

in Accomack court (McKey, 6: 214) describes <strong>John</strong> Lecatt Jr., Philip Lecatt, and Joseph Milby together in a field looking<br />

after their mother’s horse.<br />

17.McKey, 7: 76.<br />

18.McKey, 5: 37; 6: 189 & 19<strong>3.</strong><br />

19.McKey, 8: 96 & 199.<br />

20.McKey, 2: 127; 3, 127; 4, 6; 7: 19; 8: 215.<br />

21.Nottingham, 32. Phillip Alexander Lecatt predeceased his father. That he was <strong>John</strong>’s son seems clear by his frequent<br />

association in Accomack court records with the Milby children <strong>of</strong> Thomasin Milby Lecatt, with <strong>John</strong> Lecatt Jr., and several<br />

other associated individuals.<br />

22.Nottingham, 57. In his 1709 will, Rowland Savage names a daughter Patience Lecatt, wife <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> Lecatt. He also<br />

names a Mary Roads, wife <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> Roads. For Mary Roads being Philip Lecatt’s widow see McKey, 11: 84: “<strong>John</strong> Roads . . .<br />

and his wife Mary (who had been Philip Lecat’s widow).”<br />

2<strong>3.</strong>Nottingham, 3<strong>3.</strong><br />

24.McKey, 11: 35.<br />

25.Whitelaw, 1234.<br />

26.Nottingham, 37.<br />

27.Nottingham, 37.<br />

28.Nottingham, 46.<br />

29.McKey, 10: 186. The Prices were neighbors (see Whitelaw, 1228).<br />

30.McKey, 10: 5.<br />

31.McKey, 1: 172.<br />

32.McKey, 10: 54.<br />

3<strong>3.</strong>McKey, 10: 60.<br />

34.McKey, 9: 77 and 10: 109<br />

35.McKey, 10: 58.<br />

36.Accomack <strong>County</strong> Wills & Deeds, 1692-1715 Part 2, FHL micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 30011, p.206 [typescript copy]<br />

37.Accomack <strong>County</strong> Wills & Deeds, 1692-1715 Part 2, FHL micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 30011, p.207 [typescript copy]<br />

38.McKey, 10: 109.<br />

39.Whitelaw, 38.<br />

40.Accomack <strong>County</strong> Wills & Deeds, 1692-1715 Part 2, FHL micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 30011, p.446 [typescript copy]<br />

Page 13 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


41.<strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong> Land Records, Liber CD, folio 585. MD State Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm CR 31,806,. 42.Patent Records,<br />

1716-1722. Liber FF7, folio 135. MD State Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm SR 7460.<br />

4<strong>3.</strong>Fleet, 52.<br />

44.Fleet, 52.<br />

45.Northumberland <strong>County</strong>, Virginia Record Book 1710-1713: Deeds Wills Inventories Etc. FHL micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 32639. folio<br />

327.<br />

46.Fleet, 52.<br />

47.Northumberland <strong>County</strong>, Virginia Record Book 1710-1713: Deeds Wills Inventories Etc. FHL micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 32639. folio<br />

335.<br />

48.Northumberland <strong>County</strong>, Virginia Record Book 1710-1713: Deeds Wills Inventories Etc. FHL micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 32639. folio<br />

336.<br />

49.Based on search <strong>of</strong> Nell Marion Nugent, Cavaliers and Pioneers (Richmond, Virginia: The Library <strong>of</strong> Virginia,<br />

2004), volumes 1 through <strong>3.</strong><br />

50.Nugent, 2: 158.<br />

51.Legally one could not claim a headright unless the individual transported had either died or remained in the colony for a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> 3 years; though it is unclear how strictly this residency stipulation was enforced.<br />

52.Transcriptions <strong>of</strong> the Somserset <strong>County</strong> tax lists may be found at the website <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Maryland</strong> State Archives. Search<br />

Guide to Government Records, <strong>County</strong> Records on Micr<strong>of</strong>ilm.<br />

5<strong>3.</strong>Worcester <strong>County</strong> Md, Wills, 1688-1742, Liber JW 15, folio 201. MD State Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm CR 46,717.<br />

54.Tract location was pinpointed by <strong>John</strong> C. Lyon, based on his excellent work on Worcester <strong>County</strong> land records.<br />

55.Worcester <strong>County</strong> Md, Wills, 1742-1758, Liber JW 2, folio 11<strong>3.</strong> MD State Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm CR 43,744.<br />

56.Worcester <strong>County</strong>, Md. Wills, 1742-1758, Liber JW 2, folio 114. MD State Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm CR 43,744.<br />

57.An original copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s will may be found at the <strong>Maryland</strong> State Archives. It is listed in the Prerogative<br />

Court index for <strong>Maryland</strong> probate records.<br />

58.One difficulty with this is that Susannah <strong>Bradford</strong> (but not Tabitha) was listed as a child <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> and Tabitha in the will<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> Lecatt, and from this we might presume that she was the eldest. Yet she is listed second among <strong>John</strong>’s daughters in his<br />

1740 will, after Tabitha.<br />

59.<strong>Nathaniel</strong> and Susannah were certainly the children <strong>of</strong> Tabitha (Lecatt) <strong>Bradford</strong>, since they were named in <strong>John</strong><br />

Lecatt’s will. Tabitha 3 <strong>Bradford</strong> (<strong>John</strong> 2 Nath 1 ) was presumably named after her mother. For Tabitha’s marriage to ____ Alford,<br />

see estate account <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> 3 <strong>Bradford</strong> in <strong>Maryland</strong> Prerogative Court Accounts 1759-1760, Liber 44, folios 206-207, MD State<br />

Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 56-1.<br />

60.For marriage to Aaron Timmons see estate account for <strong>John</strong> 3 <strong>Bradford</strong> as in note 59. For children see will <strong>of</strong> Arean<br />

(Aaron) Timmans, Mddelgenealogy.com. From Neil and Leslie Keddie, Worcester <strong>County</strong> Wills 1759-1769, page 2.<br />

61.See <strong>John</strong> 3 <strong>Bradford</strong> estate account in <strong>Maryland</strong> Prerogative Court Accounts 1759-1760, Liber 44, folios 206-207, MD<br />

State Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 56-1. George Davis and Warren Hadder both married daughters <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> 3 <strong>Bradford</strong>, but their identity<br />

is unknown. Comfort 4 <strong>Bradford</strong>, Rachel 4 <strong>Bradford</strong>, and Martha 4 <strong>Bradford</strong> are the only three daughters for whom marital<br />

information is unknown.<br />

62.See <strong>John</strong> 3 <strong>Bradford</strong> estate account in <strong>Maryland</strong> Prerogative Court Accounts 1759-1760, Liber 44, folios 206-207, MD<br />

State Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 56-1: “Money pd <strong>John</strong> Holloway who married a Daughter <strong>of</strong> the deced.” For the date <strong>of</strong> the<br />

marriage and list <strong>of</strong> children, see Register <strong>of</strong> St. Martin’s Church Worcester Parish Worcester Co., MD. 1722-1839 (San<br />

Francisco: DAR, San Francisco Chapter, 1952), 105.<br />

6<strong>3.</strong>See note 61.<br />

64.See <strong>John</strong> 3 <strong>Bradford</strong> estate account in <strong>Maryland</strong> Prerogative Court Accounts 1759-1760, Liber 44, folios 206-207, MD<br />

State Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm 56-1: “Money pd Nehemiah Truitt who married a Daughter <strong>of</strong> the deced.” For the list <strong>of</strong> children<br />

see Register <strong>of</strong> St. Martin’s Church Worcester Parish Worcester Co., MD. 1722-1839 (San Francisco: DAR, San Francisco<br />

Chapter, 1952), 6; also will <strong>of</strong> Nehemiah Truitt, Mddelgenealogy.com. From Neil and Leslie Keddie, Worcester <strong>County</strong> Wills<br />

1769-1774, page 11.<br />

65.See deposition <strong>of</strong> Rebecka Smith in Worcester <strong>County</strong> Md. Wills 1742-1758, Liber JW 2, folio 114. MD State Archives<br />

micr<strong>of</strong>ilm CR 43,744-2: “She this deponent was at her father <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s.”<br />

66.See note 61.<br />

Page 14 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Bibliography<br />

Fleet, Beverly, editor. Virginia Colonial Abstracts Vol. XIX, Northumbria collectanea. Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing<br />

Company, 1971.<br />

Jett, Carolyn H. Records <strong>of</strong> Northumberland <strong>County</strong>, Virginia. Bowie, Md: Heritage Books, 1994.<br />

Mackey, Howard and Groves, Marlene Alma Hinkley, CG, editors. Northampton <strong>County</strong> Virginia Record Book Orders,<br />

Deeds, Wills &c. Volume 5, 1654-1655. Rockport, Maine: Picton Press, 1999.<br />

Mackey, Howard and Groves, Marlene Alma Hinkley, CG, editors. Northampton <strong>County</strong> Virginia Record Book Orders,<br />

Deeds, Wills &c. Volume 8, 1657-1664. Rockport, Maine: Picton Press, 2002.<br />

McKey, JoAnn Riley. Accomack <strong>County</strong>, Virginia Court Order Abstracts, Electronic Edition. 10 volumes. Bowie, <strong>Maryland</strong>:<br />

Heritage Books, Inc., 2001.<br />

McKey, JoAnn Riley. Accomack <strong>County</strong> Virginia Court Order Abstracts 1714-1719 Vols. 12 & 13 Bowie, <strong>Maryland</strong>:<br />

Heritage Books, Inc., 2000.<br />

Nottingham, Stratton. Wills and Administrations <strong>of</strong> Accomack <strong>County</strong>, Virginia 1663-1800 Baltimore: Genealogical<br />

Publishing Company, 1999.<br />

Nugent, Nell Marion. Cavaliers and Pioneers Richmond, Virginia: The Library <strong>of</strong> Virginia, 2004, Vols. 1-<strong>3.</strong><br />

Whitelaw, Ralph T. Virginia’s Eastern Shore Rockport, Maine: Picton Press,2001.<br />

Page 15 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Appendix A: Timeline <strong>of</strong> Events in <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s Life<br />

YEAR AGE EVENT<br />

1677 (Apr 7? -Jun 10?) born around or before this date<br />

1690 19 Nov 13 brother William petitions with Joane for administration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s estate<br />

1692 Feb 16 15 petitions to choose Thomas Budd guardian<br />

1697 17 Jun 20 witness to Elizabeth Stratton’s will<br />

1698 7 Apr 21 complaint <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> against <strong>John</strong> Read dismissed<br />

10 Jun <strong>John</strong>’s release to brother William from father’s estate<br />

4 Oct deed <strong>of</strong> 364 acres from Thomas Budd to <strong>John</strong> (A140)<br />

4 Oct Joan Budd relinquishes dower to son <strong>John</strong><br />

4 Oct <strong>John</strong>’s release to Thomas Budd and brother William acknowledged in court<br />

1699 7 Nov 22 on grand jury<br />

1702 1 Dec 25 <strong>John</strong> Lecatt’s will: daughter Tabitha with children Susanna and <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong><br />

1703 2 Jun 26 petitions to be paid for serving as witness for Charles Ventetson against Capt. Bennt. Scarburgh<br />

1705 6 Mar 28 <strong>John</strong>’s servant William Brian petitions for his freedom<br />

4 Apr on jury<br />

4 Apr William Brian ordered to return to <strong>John</strong>’s service<br />

5 Jun with <strong>Nathaniel</strong> Williams, proves will <strong>of</strong> Hendrick <strong>John</strong>son<br />

1706 1 Oct 29 on grand jury<br />

1 Oct deed <strong>of</strong> 64 acres to <strong>John</strong> Murraine (A140)<br />

1 Oct Tabitha’s releases dower on 64 acres to <strong>John</strong> Murraign<br />

1707 6 Aug 30 with Mary Sample, proves will <strong>of</strong> Elizabeth Stratton<br />

1708 4 Aug 31 asks to be paid for serving as witness for <strong>John</strong> Blake against Charles Taylor<br />

1709 2 Feb 32 <strong>John</strong> and William Belk security for Richard Price’s estate<br />

2 Aug with <strong>John</strong> Watts & Andrew Crawford, proves will <strong>of</strong> Thomas Taylor<br />

1710 7 Feb 33 sale <strong>of</strong> 300 acres to Thomas Nock (A140)<br />

8 Nov purchases St. Martins Desert from William Townsend<br />

1713 Jul? 36 <strong>John</strong> quits claim on Henry Franklings land in St. Stephen’s Parish, N’umberland to Thomas Smith<br />

Aug 17 mentioned in deposition <strong>of</strong> Hannah Smith & James White <strong>of</strong> N’umberland<br />

1716 Aug 2 39 assigned <strong>John</strong>s Lot by <strong>John</strong> Caldwell Jr.<br />

1723 46 SoCo tax list, B’norton; dep <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

1724 47 SoCo tax list, B’norton; dep <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

1725 48 SoCo tax list, B’norton; dep <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

1727 50 SoCo tax list, B’norton; dep William; <strong>Nathaniel</strong> dep <strong>of</strong> Warren Hadder ‘next door’<br />

1728 51 not on tax list (B’norton lost)<br />

1729 52 not on tax list; Nath dep <strong>of</strong> Warren Hadder<br />

1730 53 SoCo tax list, B’norton; dep William; <strong>Nathaniel</strong> HH; Adam dep <strong>of</strong> Sam Hopkins in Bmo<br />

1731 54 SoCo tax list, B’norton; no Nath; William HH Bmo; Adam dep Hopkins Bmo<br />

1733 56 SoCo tax list, B’norton; William HH next door; Nath HH Bmo; Adam dep Hopkins Bmo<br />

1734 57 SoCo tax list, B’norton; Wm HH Bmo; Nath HH Bmo; Adam dep Ed Round B’norton nextdoor<br />

1735 58 SoCo tax list, B’norton; Wm HH Bmo; Nath HH Bmo; Adam HH B’norton<br />

1736 59 SoCo tax list, B’norton; Wm HH Bmo; Nath HH Bmo; Adam HH B’norton<br />

1737 60 SoCo tax list, B’norton; Wm HH Bmo; Nath HH Bmo; no Adam<br />

1738 61 SoCo tax list, B’norton; Wm HH Bmo; Nath HH Bmo; no Adam<br />

1739 62 SoCo tax list, B’norton; Wm HH Bmo; Nath HH Bmo; Adam HH B’norton<br />

1740 63 SoCo tax list, B’norton, Jno dep; Wm HH Bmo; Nath HH B’Norton; Adam HH B’norton<br />

4 Feb will written, recorded in <strong>Somerset</strong> <strong>County</strong>, mentions all daughters by name<br />

1742 3 Sep 65 will written<br />

1753 5 Oct 76 will proven; wife Margaret; sons <strong>Nathaniel</strong>, William, <strong>John</strong>; 8 daughters incl Rebecca<br />

1754 6 Apr inventory <strong>of</strong> his estate<br />

1760 4 Feb account <strong>of</strong> his estate<br />

Page 16 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Appendix B: Transcripts <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> Probate Records<br />

Will <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> – 3 September 1742 – 5 October 1753<br />

[Worcester <strong>County</strong> Md, Wills, 1742-1758, Liber JW 2, folio 11<strong>3.</strong> MD State Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm CR 43,744.]<br />

In the Name <strong>of</strong> God amen the third day <strong>of</strong> September Anno quie domine one thousand seven hundred and<br />

forty two I <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> <strong>of</strong> Worcester <strong>County</strong> being in perfect health <strong>of</strong> Body and <strong>of</strong> mind and memory thanks be to<br />

God therefore calling unto mind the mortality <strong>of</strong> my body and knowing that it is appointed for all men once to die<br />

do make and ordaine this my last Will and Testament that is to say princiably and first <strong>of</strong> all I give and recom=<br />

mend my Soul unto the hand <strong>of</strong> God that gave it and for my body I recommend it to the earth to be buried in a<br />

Christian like and decent manner at the discretion <strong>of</strong> my Executors nothing doubting but at the genarell resurrection<br />

to receive the same again by the mighty power <strong>of</strong> God and as touching such Worldy Estate herewith it hath pleas=<br />

ed God to bless me with in this life I give device and dispose <strong>of</strong> the same in the following manner and form ---<br />

Imprimis I give to my dearly beloved wife Margrett all my Movables except three puter dishes and likewise the<br />

(114)<br />

Exetor and my son William Exetor <strong>of</strong> all movables – Item I give to my son <strong>Nathaniel</strong> a certain Quantity <strong>of</strong> Land called<br />

Saint Martins Disarts lying and being on the South side <strong>of</strong> Joseph Jones Road the devition being at marked white oak<br />

as the road runs and to come now further and likewise one puter dish to him and his heirs and Asignes forever ----<br />

Itim I give to my Son William a certain Quantity <strong>of</strong> land called Saint Martaines disart liing and being on the North side<br />

<strong>of</strong> Joseph Jounses Road beginning at a certain white Oak marked and standing next to the said Joanses and the devision between<br />

my son William and my son <strong>John</strong> Shall be the branch and likewise one great puter dish to him and his heirs and<br />

Assigns forever --- Itim I give to my son <strong>John</strong> one hundred acres <strong>of</strong> Land part <strong>of</strong> the said hundred acres is the Plantation<br />

whereon I live and fifty acres called <strong>John</strong>s Lot and one puter dish to him his heirs and Assigns forever – Item I give all my<br />

goods and chattles to be equally divided among my eight Daughters at my wife’s decease to them their heirs and Assigns<br />

forever And do hereby utterly revoke disallow revoke and disallow all and every other former Testements<br />

and Executors by me in every ways before this time Willed and bequed being and confirming this and no other to be my<br />

last Will and Testament In Witness where<strong>of</strong> I have hereunto sett my hand and Seal the day and year above written . . . .<br />

Signed Sealed Published and recommended and delivered by the said <strong>John</strong> } Robert Rathbone <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong><br />

<strong>Bradford</strong> Seonear his last Will and Testamant in the presence <strong>of</strong> us the Subescribers } George [D] Jaroman<br />

N.B. the Subscribing Witnesses departed this life before the Testator - - - - - - - - - B. Harris Depty. Comry<br />

October y e 5 th 1753 Came William <strong>Bradford</strong> and made Oath on the holy Avengalis <strong>of</strong> Almighty God that he verily believes the<br />

above will to be the last Will and Testament <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> late <strong>of</strong> Worcester <strong>County</strong> deceased and that he never knew or heard<br />

<strong>of</strong> any other later Will or Testament by the said <strong>John</strong> made after the above<br />

Sworn before Benton Harris Depty. Comry. <strong>of</strong> Worcester Coty<br />

* * * * *<br />

Page 17 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Depositions Relating to Will <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> – 3 September 1742 – 5 October 1753<br />

[Worcester <strong>County</strong>, Md. Wills, 1742-1758, Liber JW 2, folio 114. MD State Archives micr<strong>of</strong>ilm CR 43,744.]<br />

Worcester fs. Joseph Jones being <strong>of</strong> full age and being sworn on the holy Avengalis <strong>of</strong> Almighty God deposeth and saith that upwards<br />

<strong>of</strong> twelve years past he this deponant had an Order to clear a Road from Pocomoke River to Buckinham and some time after red=<br />

ing the s d . Road this deponant saw a White oak mark’d with three notches on a Side on four sides which look to be but just marked<br />

and some small time afterwards this deponant was riding the same road with <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> and asked him what that<br />

Tree was mark’d for the said Jn o <strong>Bradford</strong> Answered that from that tree up the road towards Buckingham was the division<br />

between (his sons) <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> and William <strong>Bradford</strong> and that part to the Southward <strong>of</strong> the said road was to be Nathan<br />

iels; and on the Northward was to be William’s and that he the said <strong>John</strong> then Told this deponant that he had likewise<br />

made a division between his son William and his son <strong>John</strong> and further this deponant saith not. Joseph [I I] Jones<br />

Taken before Benton Harris Depty. Comry. <strong>of</strong> Worcester <strong>County</strong><br />

Rebeckah Smith <strong>of</strong> full age and being sworn on the holy Evengalis <strong>of</strong> Almighty God deposeth and Saith that<br />

about nine or ten years ago she this deponant was at her father <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>’s and the said <strong>John</strong> went abroad<br />

and when he came home Robert Rathbone came with him as she understood to write his the said <strong>John</strong>’s Will and the said<br />

Robert set down to write and that the said <strong>John</strong> desired her this deponant to go for George Jarman to be a Witness to the<br />

said Will and when he came y e . said Robert desired <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> to come and acknowledge the will which he accord<br />

ingly did and sealed it and was at that time to the best <strong>of</strong> this deponants Judgment in perfect health and sound memo<br />

ry and desired the said George and Robert to sign as Witnesses to ye Same which this deponant saw they according<br />

ly did in her sight and further this deponant saith not ------------------------------------------------Rebeckah [O] Smith<br />

Taken before Benton Harris Depty. Comry. <strong>of</strong> Worcester Coty<br />

<strong>John</strong> Holloway Junr. being <strong>of</strong> full age and sworn on the holoy Avangalis <strong>of</strong> Almighty God deposeth and Saith that<br />

about Ten years agoe he this deponant went to <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>s and Robert Rathbone was writing the said <strong>John</strong>’s Will<br />

(115)<br />

he this deponant Stay’d till the Will was finished and heard the said <strong>John</strong> make the division <strong>of</strong> his land in the said<br />

Will between his sons in the following manner. The road that leads from Joseph Jones to Buckingham beginning at at a<br />

marked white Oak standing on the Northermost side <strong>of</strong> the raod to be the division between <strong>Nathaniel</strong> and William<br />

the land on the south side <strong>of</strong> the said Road to be <strong>Nathaniel</strong>’s and on the North side to be William’s from the said<br />

Road to a branch next to the Plantation whereon the said <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> lived, and the remaining part <strong>of</strong> his<br />

Land to his son <strong>John</strong> and further this deponant saith that he saw <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> seal the said Will & heard<br />

him publish the same to be his last Will and further this deponant sath that at the time <strong>of</strong> his so doing he<br />

the said <strong>John</strong> was in perfect health and <strong>of</strong> sound memory to the best <strong>of</strong> hyis apprehension and also that he was (desired) by<br />

<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> to sign the said Will as an Evidence with Geo. Jerman and Robert Rathbone but William <strong>Bradford</strong><br />

was present said that he this deponant was too near <strong>of</strong> him to be a Witness and further saith not. <strong>John</strong> Holloway Junr.<br />

Taken before Benton Harris Depty. Comry. <strong>of</strong> Worcester Coty<br />

* * * * *<br />

Page 18 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


<strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> Will – 4 February 1739/40<br />

[<strong>Maryland</strong> Hall <strong>of</strong> Records, Loose Files]<br />

In the Name <strong>of</strong> God Amen I <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> Senr. <strong>of</strong> the <strong>County</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Somerset</strong><br />

& Province <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong> being in health <strong>of</strong> body & Sound & perfect Memory (Prayse<br />

be to God for y e Same) and knowing y e Shortness <strong>of</strong> this Life and being Desirous<br />

to Settle things In order doe Make this My Last Will and Testament In Manner<br />

following that is To Say first & Principally I Commend my Soul to Almighty<br />

God my Creator [??] following that I shall Receive Last Pardon and free<br />

Remission <strong>of</strong> all my Sins & be Saved by ye Death & Meritts <strong>of</strong> my Saviour – and<br />

Redeemer Christ [??] & my Body to the Earth from Whence it was taken to be<br />

Decently Buried as to my Executor & Executrix hereafter Named shall think fitt and<br />

Convenient & as Touching my Worldly Estate my Will & Meaning is y t y e Same be [??]<br />

as by me hereafter Expressed and [??] I doe Revoke Renounce [??] and Make<br />

Voide all Wills by me formerly Made & Publish & Declare & Doe appoint this to be my<br />

Last Will & Testament<br />

Item I Give and Bequeath unto My Son <strong>Nathaniel</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> and to his heirs and assigns Part<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Tract <strong>of</strong> Land Called Saint Martins Desart begining at Marked Tree by y e Roade from<br />

Joseph Jones To Buckingham & from thence to y e end <strong>of</strong> the Ridge towards William [Rounds?]<br />

Containing one hundred acres more or Less and one Larg Puter Dish<br />

Item I Give and Bequeath unto my Son William <strong>Bradford</strong> and to his heirs and assigns<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> a Tract <strong>of</strong> Land Called Saint Martins Desert being the Place Whereon my Son <strong>Nathaniel</strong><br />

Now Liveth & [??] [??] to y e Roade abovesd Containing one hundred Acres ore or less<br />

and one Large Puter Dish<br />

Item I Give and Bequeath unto my Son <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> and to his heirs and assigns Part <strong>of</strong><br />

the Tract aforesaid Contange one hundred acres to Witt my Plantation Whereon I now Live<br />

& all houses orchard fencing and Appurtenances thereunto Belonging and also fifty acres<br />

<strong>of</strong> Land Called <strong>John</strong>s Lott & one Large Puter Dish<br />

Item I Lett unto my Loveing Wife Margrett <strong>Bradford</strong> y e Whole <strong>of</strong> my Plantation & Personal<br />

Estate During her Widowhood and after her Marage or Death I give ye Same as follows<br />

That is to say I Devise & itt is My Will that the Same be Equally Divided amongst my<br />

Daughters Tabitha Susanah Comfort Francis Rachell Mary Rebeca & Martha to be<br />

Divided by the [??] <strong>of</strong> my Estate Except a three year old heiffer to Each <strong>of</strong> my youngest<br />

Daughters Rebeca & Martha to be Declared at the Apraisement<br />

Lastly I Doe Appoint my Well Beloved Wife Margrett <strong>Bradford</strong> & my Son William<br />

<strong>Bradford</strong> Whole & Sole Executrix & Executor <strong>of</strong> this my Last Will & Testament and doe<br />

Acknowledge This to be my Last Will & Testament In Confirmation <strong>of</strong> Which<br />

I have hereunto Sett my hand and Seale thy forth day <strong>of</strong> febr. one Thousand<br />

Seven hundred & thirty Nine forty<br />

Signed Sealed & Acknowledged<br />

In Presence <strong>of</strong> us<br />

George [his mark] Jarman <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong><br />

Mary [W] Jarman<br />

* * * * *<br />

Page 19 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Inventory <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>, 6 April 1754<br />

[<strong>Maryland</strong> Hall <strong>of</strong> Records, Micr<strong>of</strong>ilm Roll SR 4350-2, Lib. 57, f. 428 (Prerogative Court Inventories 1753-1754)]<br />

-----------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

Worcester <strong>County</strong> April ye 6 Day 1754<br />

An Inventory <strong>of</strong> the goods & Chattles Rites<br />

and Prodits[?] <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> Late <strong>of</strong> thes <strong>County</strong><br />

Decest Appaised in Curt on A Money by us the<br />

under Subscribers Vizt ---<br />

-----------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

<strong>John</strong> Evans<br />

Ebenezer Evans<br />

To 1 Cow & Calf @ 45/To 1 Ditto @ 35/ 4, 0, 0<br />

To 1 Barion[?] Cow @ 35/To 2 Earlinge @ 30/ 3, 5, 0<br />

To 4 Sheep & a Lam 28/6 To 1 pare <strong>of</strong> Shallerou[?] 6. 1, 14, 6<br />

To 2 Old Books 3/To 1 Iron 1/To 17 <strong>of</strong> Puter 17/ 1, 1, 0<br />

To 1 Puter Dish a legese to Nath. 13/6 0, 13, 6<br />

To 1 Ditto to W m . 13/6 To 1 Ditto to <strong>John</strong> 6/ 0, 19, 6<br />

To 1 Pan @ 2/6 To 1 Hamlo 2/6 To 1 C <strong>of</strong> foams 1/ 0, 6, 0<br />

To 4 Old Chairs @6/ To 1 pare <strong>of</strong> Old weges 4/ 0, 10, 0<br />

To a Parcell <strong>of</strong> Shoomakers Ints[?] 10/ To 1 } 0, 11, 0<br />

Kerefo 1 }<br />

To 2 old Chests 7/6 to 1 Box 3/ to 1 table Cloth 7/6 0, 10, 0<br />

To 2 Buckets & 1 Tub 2/ To 1 Woollon Whool ffe 0, 9, 6<br />

To 2 Small whools 7/6 To 2 old hose 2/ } 0, 13, 6<br />

To 1 Plows 4/ }<br />

To 3 Harrow Toath @ 8/To 1 Pot and } 0, 10, 0<br />

Ketteel 10/ }<br />

To 1 Small Pot 7/6 To 1 Ditto 9/ To 2 sene } 0, 19, 6<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pot Hooks – 3/ }<br />

(429)<br />

To 1 Old saddle 5/ To some old Leather 4/ 0, 9, 0<br />

To a Parel <strong>of</strong> Old Casks 14/ 6 To 1 gug 1/6 0, 17, 0<br />

To 1 Old frow 2/ To a pair <strong>of</strong> Trucks 4/ 0, 6, 0<br />

To 1 Beed and furniture a 76 Wori Dito 90 7,6,0<br />

To 1 Carthen P 4 1/ 3,3,0<br />

To 1 Small Heide 3/6 To 1 Beelmettel Pott 0,4,0<br />

To 2 Hogsth / TO 8 sholes <strong>of</strong> To 2 half pint Bottles 1,1,0<br />

To Elaing a barrel 1,7,6<br />

31,13,0<br />

To 1 pare <strong>of</strong> Yearhackls 00,2,0<br />

the Nearest <strong>of</strong> ken <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong><br />

Rebeck [V] <strong>Bradford</strong><br />

The Greates Creditors Elizabeth [E] Murry<br />

Nath Ramsay<br />

June ye 15 th 1754 Then <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> swore on the Holy Evangels <strong>of</strong> Almighty God that this is a Just and perfect Inventory<br />

<strong>of</strong> all and singular the good and Chattles which were <strong>of</strong> the Deced That came to his hands at the time <strong>of</strong> the makeing there<strong>of</strong> and that what<br />

hath since or shall hereafter come to his hands or Possession he will turn in an Additional Inventory and that he knows <strong>of</strong> no<br />

Concealment<strong>of</strong> any Part or Parcel there<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> any Person whatsoever and that if he shall Discover any Concealment <strong>of</strong> Very port any to be,<br />

he will acquaint the Commysarry General for the time being or his Deputy with [??] Discovery or Confess <strong>of</strong> Suppition that it may be<br />

Enquired into and that he will well and truly give an Account <strong>of</strong> all and Every Part <strong>of</strong> the Deceased Personal Estate that shall hereafter<br />

come to his Hands Possession or Knowledge which Oath was taken the Day and year first above Written Before me<br />

Jno. Scarbrough<br />

Page 20 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>


Account <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong>, 4 February 1760<br />

[<strong>Maryland</strong> Hall <strong>of</strong> Records, Mic<strong>of</strong>ilm Roll 56-1, Liber 44, folios 206-207]<br />

Worcester fs. The account <strong>of</strong> William <strong>Bradford</strong> Executor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Testament & last Will <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> <strong>Bradford</strong> late <strong>of</strong> Worcester <strong>County</strong><br />

Deceased<br />

This accountant chargeth himself with an Inventory <strong>of</strong> the deceds<br />

Estate Exhibited into the prerogative <strong>of</strong>fice in to the sum <strong>of</strong> L. 31.15.1<br />

And humbly prays allowance for the following Payments and<br />

Disbursements viz.<br />

Of money pd Isaac Murray on account <strong>of</strong> the Deced Note <strong>of</strong><br />

Hand due <strong>of</strong> this amount unto [?] Knowedge by him pd } 2.10<br />

receipt appears . . .<br />

Of money paid Joshua Morss p peed[?] acct & receipt _.5.6<br />

Of money pd William Smith p paid amt & receipt apprs _5.6<br />

Of money pd Nathl. <strong>Bradford</strong> for his amt. paid (the amount }<br />

being or then left or mislaid) p receipt appears } _,6,10<br />

Of Money pd Joseph Jones p paid amt. & receipt appears _,5,<br />

Of 313 Nott Tob a . pd for <strong>County</strong> fees p au. a 18/ppt 2.6.11<br />

(207)<br />

Of 150 Toba. pd Deputy Commy fees on Granting S.l 40s Tob ?? 18.7<br />

Of or Legacy left by the sd Deced to his Son <strong>Nathaniel</strong> Inventory’d<br />

after his Death at the delivered to said <strong>Nathaniel</strong> after the<br />

William made as the deced cary on his Death Bed by his 0.9.0<br />

Order therefore this amount and Craves all warre for A being<br />

or pewter dish weighing & appraised at 6066<br />

Of a Legacy <strong>of</strong> a pewter dish left by the Deced to this accountant<br />

wt. 9 at 1/pll stanned in his own Hands 0.9.0<br />

Of a Legacy left by the deced to his Son <strong>John</strong> <strong>of</strong> a pewter<br />

Dish wt 9 appraised out <strong>of</strong> pee paid by this accountant to<br />

sd. <strong>John</strong> p receipt 0.9.9<br />

Of 74 Toba paid for stating & performing this account a 18/6 p C 0.9.3<br />

Of this accountant Commissions on payment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

above Debts amounting to the sum <strong>of</strong> 7.6.8. S 10 pct 0.14.7<br />

Of money paid Tabitha Alford Daughter <strong>of</strong> the Deced for<br />

her Dividable part <strong>of</strong> his Estate as p receipt apps <strong>3.</strong>4.7 & ¾<br />

Of Money pd Warren Hadder who married a Daughter to<br />

the deced for her full Divideable part <strong>of</strong> his Estate p receipt<br />

in full appears <strong>3.</strong>4.7 ¾<br />

Of money pd Aaron Timmons who married a Daughter to<br />

the Deced for her full part <strong>of</strong> her Estate p receipt in full <strong>3.</strong>4.7 ¾<br />

Of Money pd Rebecca <strong>Bradford</strong> Daughter <strong>of</strong> the deced for her<br />

Divideable part <strong>of</strong> his Estate in full p receipt appears <strong>3.</strong>4.7 ¾<br />

Of Money paid Nehemiah Truitt who married a Daughter<br />

<strong>of</strong> the deced for her full part <strong>of</strong> his Estate pr receipt in full <strong>3.</strong>4.7 ¾<br />

Of Monehy pd George Davis who married a Daughter <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Deced for her full part <strong>of</strong> his Estate as p rect. in full appears <strong>3.</strong>4.7 ¾<br />

Of Money pd <strong>John</strong> Holloway who married a Daughter <strong>of</strong><br />

the deced for her divideable part <strong>of</strong> the Deceds Estate in full <strong>3.</strong>4.7 ¾<br />

L 31.15.1 ¼<br />

February 4 th [?] 1760 came William <strong>Bradford</strong> the above accountant & made oath<br />

on the Hly Evanels <strong>of</strong> Almighty God that the above account as it stands<br />

stated is just & true which after due haimm[?] when thereon first had is passt by<br />

Page 21 <strong>of</strong> 21 Copyright 2008 Adam M. <strong>Bradford</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!