[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

including in the Soviet Union. Oswald was an extremist through the U.S. political lens,
but his arrogant and hostile brand of individualism, as portrayed by the Warren
Commission, made him a poor choice as conspirator and in line with the “lone-nut”
assassin thesis. He was supposedly a leftist unconnected with leftist groups in the United
States, Soviet Union, Cuba, or elsewhere.
In fact, if you take Oswald’s political views as presented by the Commission at
face value, the assassination does not make much sense, since the alleged assassin spoke
highly of Kennedy’s policies on civil rights and other matters. The Commission wrested
Oswald from the political environment in which he lived, with strong communities of
conservatives and right-wing extremists in New Orleans, Louisiana and Dallas, Texas.
Oswald’s other alleged plans to assassinate other political figures make more sense if
Oswald really had left-wing sympathies. The Commission concluded that Oswald fired a
shot at right-wing extremist, retired General William Walker, while the General was in
his Dallas home on April 10, 1963. The shot missed General Walker, and it was only
after the Kennedy assassination and the Warren Commission inquiry that Oswald was
tied to the attempted murder. Marina Oswald also testified that Oswald threatened to kill
former Vice President Richard Nixon, the Republican presidential nominee in 1960
whose political success rested on his anti-Communism.
In its report, the Commission provided a biography of the alleged assassin that
emphasized his unsettled childhood, psychological problems, his rejection of U.S. society
and dissatisfaction with Soviet life, his failures as a Marine, husband, and worker, and his
31