02.08.2013 Views

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Kevin Costner declares that the assassination was a coup d’etat with involvement by the<br />

CIA, FBI, anti-Castro Cubans, the mafia, and Lyndon Johnson himself. Lee Harvey<br />

Oswald is presented as an intelligence operative but his exact role in the plot is not clear.<br />

Garrison is unsure whether he played an active role or that he infiltrated the plot and was<br />

trying to warn the FBI. Many scenes in the conspiracy literature are presented on film –<br />

from Oswald’s connection to Guy Bannister, David Ferrie, and Clay Shaw and his<br />

alleged activities as an intelligence operative. Throughout the film, Stone mixed archival<br />

footage with recreations of speculative material – angering many critics and former<br />

officials. Stone showed as fact witness testimony that the Warren Commission had<br />

discounted and the evidence collected by the real life Jim Garrison. In this way, he<br />

offered a counter-weight to the Warren Commission’s own selective editing of testimony<br />

and evidence. In some interviews, Stone said he was seeking to create a “countermyth”<br />

to the official Warren Commission’s “myth” of the lone gunman. 684<br />

The Warner Brothers’ film reached a vast audience – with a domestic gross of<br />

more than $70-million – to popularize theories of Secret Agent Oswald and the “peace<br />

thesis.” While some of Stone’s ideas were not new, he reached many more people<br />

through his film than even the best-selling books about the assassination. Given the<br />

success of his film and the popularity of the conspiracy theories about the assassination,<br />

Stone presented “a people’s history” that many Americans embraced in contrast to their<br />

skepticism about the Warren Commission’s “official history.”<br />

684<br />

Quoted in Robert Brent Toplin, History by Hollywood, (Chicago: <strong>University</strong> of Illinois<br />

Press, 1996), 66-67.<br />

300

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!