Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 3: messenger RNA expression is a prognostic marker in curatively resected non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10(5):1588-1596. 1. Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, Cope LM, Hobbs B, Speed TP: Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31(4):e15. 2. Li C, Wong WH: Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98(1):31-36. 3. Bhattacharjee A, Richards WG, Staunton J, Li C, Monti S, Vasa P, Ladd C, Beheshti J, Bueno R, Gillette M et al: Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98(24):13790-13795. 4. Stearman RS, Dwyer-Nield L, Zerbe L, Blaine SA, Chan Z, Bunn PA, Jr., Johnson GL, Hirsch FR, Merrick DT, Franklin WA et al: Analysis of orthologous gene expression between human pulmonary adenocarcinoma and a carcinogen-induced murine model. Am J Pathol 2005, 167(6):1763-1775. 5. Rosner B: Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 5th edn. Pacific Grove: Duxbury; 2000. 6. Alpaydin E: Introduction to Machine Learning. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2004. 7. Manly BFJ: Multivariate Statistical Methods, 3rd edn. Washington D.C.: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2005. 8. Linear Discriminant Analysis, A Brief tutorial [http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~ich/classes/mumt611/classifiers/lda_theory.pdf] 9. Fisher Linear Discriminant Analysis [http://www.ics.uci.edu/~welling/classnotes/papers_class/Fisher-LDA.pdf] 10. Random Forest [http://oz.berkeley.edu/users/breiman/randomforest2001.pdf] 11. Looking Inside the Black Box [http://stat-www.berkeley.edu/users/breiman/wald2002- 2.pdf] 12. Diaz-Uriarte R, Alvarez de Andres S: Gene selection and classification of Microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:3. 13. Davis JG, M.: The Relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC Curves. ICML Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning 2006:8. 14. Everson Richard M. JF: Multi-class ROC analysis from a multi-objective optimisation perspective. Pattern Recognition Letters 2006, 27(8):22. 162
15. Irizarry RA: affy. In.: Bioconductor. 16. R DCT: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. In. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 17. Li C, Hung Wong W: Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: model validation, design issues and standard error application. Genome biology 2001, 2(8):RESEARCH0032. 18. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP: Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 2003, 4(2):249-264. 19. Berrar DP, Downes CS, Dubitzky W: Multiclass cancer classification using gene expression profiling and probabilistic neural networks. Pac Symp Biocomput 2003:5- 16. 20. Fridlyand SDaJ: Introduction to Classification in Microarray Experiments. In: DNA Arrays Methods and Protocols. Edited by Rampal JB, vol. 170. Totoja, NJ: Humana Press: 132-149. 21. G. Parmigiani ESG, R. A. Irizarry, S. L. Zeger: The Analysis of Gene Expression Data. New York: Springer; 2003. 22. Kostka D, Spang R: Microarray based diagnosis profits from better documentation of gene expression signatures. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4(2):e22. 23. Li L, Weinberg CR, Darden TA, Pedersen LG: Gene selection for sample classification based on gene expression data: study of sensitivity to choice of parameters of the GA/KNN method. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2001, 17(12):1131-1142. 24. Ringner M, Peterson C: Microarray-based cancer diagnosis with artificial neural networks. Biotechniques 2003, Suppl:30-35. 25. Ringner M, Peterson C, Khan J: Analyzing array data using supervised methods. Pharmacogenomics 2002, 3(3):403-415. 26. Statnikov A, Aliferis CF, Tsamardinos I, Hardin D, Levy S: A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for Microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2005, 21(5):631-643. 27. Statnikov A, Tsamardinos I, Dosbayev Y, Aliferis CF: GEMS: a system for automated cancer diagnosis and biomarker discovery from Microarray gene expression data. International journal of medical informatics 2005, 74(7-8):491-503. 28. Statnikov A, Wang L, Aliferis CF: A comprehensive comparison of random forests and support vector machines for Microarray-based cancer classification. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:319. 163
Page 1 and 2:
An Adenocarcinoma Case Study of the
Page 3 and 4:
DEDICATION The work presented in th
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ..
Page 7 and 8:
Conclusion.........................
Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page Figure
Page 11 and 12:
violate the linear correlation rela
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1: An Introduction to Micro
Page 15 and 16:
previously stated, rigorous reagent
Page 17 and 18:
Factors influencing Signal Interpre
Page 19 and 20:
likelihood that no such structural
Page 21 and 22:
hybridization and multiple dye stra
Page 23 and 24:
classical reaction equations, modif
Page 25 and 26:
prevent the hybridization of probes
Page 27 and 28:
platforms are used to deposit them
Page 29 and 30:
and chip layout [64]. In particular
Page 31 and 32:
whether analyses based upon individ
Page 33 and 34:
The process of determining a candid
Page 35 and 36:
implemented in order to demonstrate
Page 37 and 38:
affecting probe-target duplex forma
Page 39 and 40:
It has long been known that the var
Page 41 and 42:
probes can thus be reincorporated i
Page 43 and 44:
(Carr, ms in review). This ProbeFAT
Page 45 and 46:
have specific attributes which can
Page 47 and 48:
elow saturation. The investigator m
Page 49 and 50:
a. A filter based on how many probe
Page 51 and 52:
means. The remaining sets possess s
Page 53 and 54:
for the 24 samples in the Lu, et al
Page 55 and 56:
Table 2.1: Probe Numbers per filter
Page 57 and 58:
the effect can be. Both the type of
Page 59 and 60:
described above. In Figure 2.3, the
Page 61 and 62:
various data processing stages are
Page 63 and 64:
position of the probe on the transc
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 2.5: BaFL consistency. Demon
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 2.6: Probe-Transcript region
Page 69 and 70:
Table 2.3: ProbeSet behavior predic
Page 71 and 72:
cleansing process. This is demonstr
Page 73 and 74:
Table 2.4: ProbeSet behavior of pro
Page 75 and 76:
A Priori Prediction We demonstrated
Page 77 and 78:
Conclusion We have presented a comp
Page 79 and 80:
mind that they are most aware of th
Page 81 and 82:
Probe Cleansing Methods The BaFL pr
Page 83 and 84:
are significant assume such a data
Page 85 and 86:
cleansing process and were assessed
Page 87 and 88:
sample selection, with replacement,
Page 89 and 90:
Figure 3.1: P value distributions.
Page 91 and 92:
Figure 3.2: Down selection models-
Page 93 and 94:
cleansing methods were used to gene
Page 95 and 96:
Discussion A striking result from t
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 3.6: Concordance summary. Th
Page 99 and 100:
whole model analysis without permut
Page 101 and 102:
change, apparently the greater vari
Page 103 and 104:
though in Chapter 2 we showed that
Page 105 and 106:
Although a list of 325 candidate ge
Page 107 and 108:
was determined to consist of 30 Pro
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 4.1: Non-traditional PCA ana
Page 111 and 112:
for the RMA and dCHIP interpretatio
Page 113 and 114:
was one of them: it is counted as p
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 4.5: Kaplan-Meyer survival c
Page 117 and 118:
Figure 4.7: Low grade tumor surviva
Page 119 and 120:
The candidate gene list values were
Page 121 and 122:
ejecting the null hypothesis [8], a
Page 123 and 124: Figure 4.9: GO connectivity of cand
Page 125 and 126: under linear and non-linear dimensi
Page 127 and 128: sample cleansing process and these
Page 129 and 130: averaged to give a final approximat
Page 131 and 132: 119 Table 5.1: : NSCLC candidate ge
Page 133 and 134: Figure 5.1: NSCLC ProbeSet gain sel
Page 135 and 136: Figure 5.3: NSCLC refined average p
Page 137 and 138: statistical criterion, but it appea
Page 139 and 140: lacking p53 mutations [30]. While,
Page 141 and 142: Kruppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) has al
Page 143 and 144: Appendix A # This is the main drive
Page 145 and 146: def Driver(usr, pswd, db, logfile,
Page 147 and 148: def DriverXH(usr, pswd, db, logfile
Page 149 and 150: fp.write('\tTable '), fp.write(msk[
Page 151 and 152: #determine outliers lowrs1=nonzero(
Page 153 and 154: tmp="update sample_mask set exclude
Page 155 and 156: fp.write('\n'+msk[ptr[j]]+' exclude
Page 157 and 158: cur, conn=UpdateWorkReg(cur, conn,
Page 159 and 160: Appendix E # The result of permutin
Page 161 and 162: BIBLIOGRAPHY 149
Page 163 and 164: 13. Bowtell DD: Options available--
Page 165 and 166: method addressing dye, intensity-de
Page 167 and 168: 73. Alter O, Brown PO, Botstein D:
Page 169 and 170: 11. Kumari S, Verma LK, Weller JW:
Page 171 and 172: 38. Michael Stonebraker LAR, Michae
Page 173: 64. Cropp CS, Lidereau R, Leone A,
Page 177 and 178: Chapter 4: 1. Minna JD, Roth JA, Ga
Page 179 and 180: 30. Delaval B, Ferrand A, Conte N,
Page 181 and 182: 27. Bai J, Cederbaum AI: Catalase p
Page 183 and 184: 51. Shouse GP, Cai X, Liu X: Serine
show all

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?