02.08.2013 Views

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 5.1: NSCLC ProbeSet gain selection model perf<strong>or</strong>mances. Down selection <strong>of</strong> ProbeSets by the<br />

ProbeSet gain criterion, as presented by the weighted AUC metric. Gain criterion was calculated f<strong>or</strong> the kmeans<br />

clustering perf<strong>or</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> the average ProbeSet intensity. Left graphic is kNN implemented with<br />

k=3 and maj<strong>or</strong>ity voting and right graphic is LDA.<br />

Down selection by the gain criterion calculated as the average probe clustering perf<strong>or</strong>mance<br />

across the ProbeSet yields similar classification perf<strong>or</strong>mance f<strong>or</strong> the LDA alg<strong>or</strong>ithm, and marked<br />

improvement in the kNN classification alg<strong>or</strong>ithm. Results <strong>of</strong> the down selection through the<br />

average probe gain criterion are presented in Figure 5.2. However, this is questionable approach<br />

since the ProbeSet aggregate may possess minimal gain relevance. It is our belief that the<br />

ProbeSets which are identified by both the ProbeSet and average probe gain criteria act as strong<br />

classifiers, while the less inf<strong>or</strong>mative ProbeSets which were identified by their average probe<br />

inf<strong>or</strong>mation gain act as weak to noise classifiers.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!