Download the Journal (PDF) - Division on Autism and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

fourth grades. <strong>Journal</strong> of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447. Justice L. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2003). Promising interventions for promoting emergent literacy skills: three evidence based approaches. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(3), 99–113. Kolderie, T. (1990). Beyond choice to public schools. Withdrawing <strong>the</strong> exclusive franchise in public education. Retrieved February 20, 2006, from http://www. ppionline.org/ndol/print.cfm?contentid1692 Kotter, J. (1999). Change leadership. Executive Excellence, 16(4), 16–18. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Lahm, E. A. (2003). Assistive technology specialists. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 141–153. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Lesar, S. (1998). Use of assistive technology with young children with disabilities: Current status and training needs. <strong>Journal</strong> of Early Intervention, 21, 146–159. Long, T., Huang, L., Woodbridge, M., Woolverton, M., & Minkel, J. (2003). Integrating assistive technology into an outcome-driven model of service delivery. Infants and Young Children, 16, 272–283. MacArthur, C. A. (2001). Technology implementation in special education. In J. Woodward & L. Cuban (Eds.), Technology, curriculum and professional development. Adapting schools to meet <strong>the</strong> needs of students with disabilities (pp. 115–120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Maring, G. H., Boxie, P., & Wiseman, B. J. (2000). School-university partnerships through on-line pattern books. Reading Online, 4(5). Retrieved February 20, 2006, from http://www.readingonline.org/ articles/art_index.asp?HREF/articles/maring/ index.html McMillan, J. H., & Wergin, J. F. (2002). Understanding and evaluating educational research (2 nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mistreet, S. G., Lane, S. J., & Ruffino, A. G. (2005). Growing and learning through technology: Birth to five. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 273–307). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design. National Association for <strong>the</strong> Education of Young Children. (1996). Technology and young children— Ages 3 through 8 (Position Statement). Washington, DC: Author. National Center for Technology Innovation. (2005). Moving towards solutions. Assistive and learn- 90 / Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities-March 2008 ing technology for all students. Washington, DC: Author. National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center. (2003). Assistive technology overview. Retrieved October 24, 2005, from http://www.nectac.org/ topics/atech/overview.asp?text1 No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq. (2001). North Central Professional Development Laboratory. (n.d.). Professional development. Retrieved February 20, 2006, from http://www.ncrel.org/ info/pd/ Parette, H. (1997). Assistive technology devices and services. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 267–280. Parette, H. P., Murdick, N. L., & Gartin, B. (1996). Mini-grant to <strong>the</strong> rescue! Using community resources to obtain assistive technology devices for children with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 28(2), 20–23. Parette, H. P., Peterson-Karlan, G. R., & Wojcik, B. W. (2005). The state of assistive technology services nationally and implications for future development. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2(1), 13–24. Parette, H. P., Stoner, J. B., & Watts, E. H. (2005). Making a difference with assistive technology. Grant funded by <strong>the</strong> Illinois Children’s Healthcare Foundation. Parette, P., Stoner, J., Watts, E., & Wojcik, B. W. (2006, January). Using AT toolkits to develop early writing skills with preschoolers. Paper presented to <strong>the</strong> Technology, Reading, and Learning Difficulties World Conference, San Francisco, CA. Pierce, P., & Porter, P. B. (1996). Helping persons with disabilities to become literate using assistive technology: Practice and policy suggestions. Focus on Autism and O<strong>the</strong>r Developmental Disabilities, 11, 142–148. Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology. (n.d.). Welcome. Retrieved February 20, 2006, from http://sweb.uky.edu/jszaba0/QIAT.html Randle, K., & Harris, S. (2004, March). Providing effective technology training through web based solutions. Paper presented at <strong>the</strong> Center on Disabilities Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference 2004, Northridge, CA. Reed, P., & Bowser, G. (2005). Assistive technology and <strong>the</strong> IEP. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 61–77). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design. Reichardt, R. (2001). Toward a comprehensive approach to teacher quality. Policy brief. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning. Richards, L. (2002). NVivo. [Computer software]. Bundoora Victoria, Australia: QSR International.
Riemer-Reiss, M. L., & Wacker, R. R. (2000). Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. <strong>Journal</strong> of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 44–50. Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating educational technology into teaching (4 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Sandall, S., McLean, M., & Smith, B. J. (2000). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education. Longmont, CO: Sopris West. Scott, S. B. (1997). Comparison of service delivery models influencing teachers’ use of assistive technology for students with severe disabilities. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 11(1), 61–74. SEAT Center. (2006). SEAT partners. Retrieved April 25, 2006, from http://www.seat.ilstu.org/ aboutus/partners.shtml SEAT Center, National Center for Technology Innovation, and University of Kansas. (2005). Assistive technology & educational Progress- ...Charting a new direction. Executive summary. Retrieved February 17, 2006, from http://www. nationaltechcenter.org/default.asp Sheingold, K. (1991). Restructuring for learning with technology: The potential for synergy. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1), 17–27. Sheingold, K. (1992). Technology integration and teachers’ professional development. In Learning technologies essential for education change (pp. 41– 51). Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Smedley, C. E., Heiple, V. S., Baker, S., Dunn, N., Parette, H. P., & Hendricks, M. (1997). Keyboard kids: Using computers to teach young children. Little Rock, AR: Arkansas Easter Seal Society. Smith, M. W., Dickinson, D. K., Sangeorge, A., & Anastasopoulos, L. (2002). Early language and literacy classroom observation (ELLCO) toolkit, research edition. Baltimore: Brookes. Special Education Assistive Technology Center. (2004). AT2. Preparing all teachers for assistive technology. Retrieved February 20, 2006, from http:// www.coe.ilstu.edu/seat/at2/ Speck, M., & Knipe, C. (2005). Why can’t we get it right? Designing high quality professional development for standards-based schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded <strong>the</strong>ory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Sulzby, E., & Teale, W. (1991). Emergent literacy. In R. Bart, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. 2 (pp. 727–758). New York: Longman. Todis, B., & Walker, H. M. (1993). User perspectives on assistive technology in educational settings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 26(3), 1–16. Valmont, W. J. (2003). Technology for literacy and learning. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Van Scooter, J., & Boss, S. (2002). Learners, language, and technology: Making connections that support literacy. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Whatis.com. (2006). User group. Retrieved February 20, 2006, from http://whatis.techtarget.com/ definition/0,,sid9_gci881409,00.html Whitehead, B. M., Jensen, D. F. N., & Boschee, F. (2003). Planning for technology. A guide for school administrators, technology coordinators, and curriculum leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Wiekle, B., & Hadadian, A. (2003). Can assistive technology help us not to leave any child behind? Preventing School Failure, 47, 181–186. Wojcik, B. W., Peterson-Karlan, G., Watts, E. H., & Parette, P. (2004). Assistive technology outcomes in a teacher education curriculum. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1, 21–32. Wright, J. L., & Shade, D. D. (Eds.). (1994). Young children: Active learners in a technological age. Washington, DC: NAEYC. Zabala, J. S., & Carl, D. F. (2005). Quality indicators for assistive technology in schools. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 179– 207). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc. Zorfass, J., & Rivero, H. K. (2005). Collaboration is key: How a community of practice promotes technology integration. <strong>Journal</strong> of Special Education Technology, 20(3), 51–67. Received: 20 May 2006 Initial Acceptance: 20 July 2006 Final Acceptance: 1 October 2006 Preschool Teacher Perceptions / 91
Page 1 and 2:
Education and Training in Developme
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Guardianship: Its Role in t
Page 9 and 10:
guardians who are knowledgeable abo
Page 11 and 12:
in budgeting and spending; (b) a sp
Page 13 and 14:
and effective are essential to self
Page 15 and 16:
involved in the gu
Page 17 and 18:
sonal rights removed through guardi
Page 19 and 20:
who are not trustworthy, and when o
Page 21 and 22:
Discussion and Recommendations Lake
Page 23 and 24:
DC: OSERS. (ERIC Document Reproduct
Page 25 and 26:
people who do not have disabilities
Page 27 and 28:
TABLE 1 School Demographics Demogra
Page 29 and 30:
TABLE 2 Methods for Including Stude
Page 31 and 32:
participate in service learning pro
Page 33 and 34:
who are “more experienced” in s
Page 35 and 36:
cern that they wer
Page 37 and 38:
service learning activity for stude
Page 39 and 40:
supports school personnel need to h
Page 41 and 42:
Using Pivotal Response Training wit
Page 43 and 44: the trained peers
Page 45 and 46: Group B between one and two times p
Page 47 and 48: ing play sessions with Group B, Col
Page 49 and 50: learned to interact with ot
Page 51 and 52: Affirmative sentences emphasize a v
Page 53 and 54: identifying several important behav
Page 55 and 56: Kenji. For Kenji, all observation s
Page 57 and 58: Figure 2. Percentage of 10-s interv
Page 59 and 60: gaging in complicated verbal commun
Page 61 and 62: Results The results of the<
Page 63 and 64: when the person wa
Page 65 and 66: Effectiveness of the</stron
Page 67 and 68: is still encountering only one symb
Page 69 and 70: TABLE 1 Characteristic of Participa
Page 71 and 72: TABLE 2 Characteristics of
Page 73 and 74: TABLE 3 Major Findings Study Commun
Page 75 and 76: TABLE 3—(Continued) Study Communi
Page 77 and 78: TABLE 3—(Continued) Study Communi
Page 79 and 80: nosed as having ASD. Therefore, PEC
Page 81 and 82: Preschool Teacher Perceptions of As
Page 83 and 84: TABLE 1 Teacher Demographics 1 Teac
Page 85 and 86: TABLE 3 Assistive Technology Self-A
Page 87 and 88: Integration or supplemental perspec
Page 89 and 90: I don’t know if the</stro
Page 91 and 92: sessions, and the
Page 93: that would be difficult to develop
Page 97 and 98: TABLE 1 Characteristics of Campers
Page 99 and 100: appropriate answers were provided.
Page 101 and 102: Figure 2. Effects of STAR intervent
Page 103 and 104: garding how to effectively interact
Page 105 and 106: Shafer K. (1992). Peer-mediating in
Page 107 and 108: proach, features are built into <st
Page 109 and 110: independent transitions were totale
Page 111 and 112: Figure 1. Number of independent tas
Page 113 and 114: type of skills (e.g., domestic, lei
Page 115 and 116: Peer-Implemented Time Delay Procedu
Page 117 and 118: show that peer tutors can reliably
Page 119 and 120: General Procedures The dependent va
Page 121 and 122: Skill training. The teacher and one
Page 123 and 124: Figure 2. Percent of correct respon
Page 125 and 126: heterogeneous group of students is
Page 127 and 128: States’ Eligibility Guidelines fo
Page 129 and 130: Method Procedure The first author d
Page 131 and 132: TABLE 1—(Continued) IQ part score
Page 133 and 134: eligibility to exhibit an IQ two or
Page 135: ility guidelines for MR from state
show all

Download the Journal (PDF) - Division on Autism and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?