Download the Journal (PDF) - Division on Autism and ...
Download the Journal (PDF) - Division on Autism and ...
Download the Journal (PDF) - Division on Autism and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TABLE 1—(C<strong>on</strong>tinued)<br />
Study N a<br />
Tincani<br />
(2004)<br />
Gender<br />
M F<br />
2 1 1<br />
servati<strong>on</strong>al coding. Interrater reliability data<br />
were <strong>on</strong>ly presented in eight of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> studies<br />
(67%), 5 studies (Adkins & Axelrod, 2002;<br />
Heneker & Page, 2003; Liddle, 2001; Magiati &<br />
Howlin, 2003) did not report reliability data.<br />
Characteristics of Applicati<strong>on</strong> of PECS<br />
Ethnicity<br />
a. African-<br />
American<br />
b. Asian-<br />
American<br />
PECS was delivered in a variety of natural<br />
settings, such as homes <strong>and</strong> schools, across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
13 studies. With two excepti<strong>on</strong>s, interventi<strong>on</strong><br />
agents were reported (85%). PECS was implemented<br />
specifically by experimenters or<br />
trained pers<strong>on</strong>nel in three studies (Adkins &<br />
Axelrod, 2002; Charlop-Christy et al., 2002;<br />
Ganz & Simps<strong>on</strong>, 2004), while <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> remaining<br />
eight studies utilized teachers or parents as<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> interventi<strong>on</strong> deliverers.<br />
Selected characteristics of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> PECS interventi<strong>on</strong><br />
implemented in each study are also presented<br />
in Table 2. As illustrated, nine studies<br />
indicated how many phases of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> PECS training<br />
were c<strong>on</strong>ducted; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> remaining studies did not<br />
(Adkins & Axelrod, 2002; Heneker & Page,<br />
2003; Schwartz et al., 1998). In five of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> studies<br />
that indicated PECS phases, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> participants received<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> entire six phases of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> PECS training.<br />
The remaining four studies (Anders<strong>on</strong>,<br />
2002; Ganz & Simps<strong>on</strong>, 2004; Kravits et al., 2002;<br />
Chr<strong>on</strong>ological<br />
Age<br />
(years:m<strong>on</strong>ths)<br />
5:10–6:8<br />
Total 125 68 36 1–12<br />
a<br />
Number of participants.<br />
b<br />
Pervasive developmental disorder.<br />
c<br />
Attenti<strong>on</strong> deficit hyperactivity disorder.<br />
d<br />
MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory.<br />
e<br />
Minnesota Child developmental Inventory.<br />
f<br />
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test.<br />
g<br />
Vinel<strong>and</strong> Adaptive Behavior Scales.<br />
h<br />
Preschool Language Scale.<br />
i<br />
Wechsler Preschool <strong>and</strong> Primary Scale of Intelligence.<br />
j<br />
Psychoeducati<strong>on</strong>al Profile-Revised.<br />
k<br />
Pervasive developmental disorder-not o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rwise specified.<br />
* N/A Informati<strong>on</strong> not available in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> article.<br />
Tincani, 2004) reported that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> participants<br />
received three or four phases of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> training.<br />
Treatment fidelity. Informati<strong>on</strong> regarding<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fidelity of treatment implementati<strong>on</strong> was<br />
reported in all <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> studies. However, fidelity data<br />
were <strong>on</strong>ly reported in three studies; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> remaining<br />
studies (77%) just stated that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment<br />
was implemented according to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> procedures<br />
described in The Picture Exchange Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />
System Training Manual (Adkins & Axelrod,<br />
2002; Charlop-Christy et al., 2002; Ganz & Simps<strong>on</strong>,<br />
2004; Kravits et al., 2002; Schwartz et al.,<br />
1998) or that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> implementers were formally<br />
trained to use PECS (Heneker & Page, 2003;<br />
Liddle; 2001; Magiati & Howlin, 2003). In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
three studies that reported fidelity data, two independent<br />
observers coded sessi<strong>on</strong>s or sessi<strong>on</strong><br />
videotapes to establish <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> implements’ degree<br />
of adherence to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment manual c<strong>on</strong>tent<br />
(Anders<strong>on</strong>, 2002; J<strong>on</strong>es, 2005; Tincani, 2004).<br />
For those three studies, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mean interobserver<br />
agreement for treatment fidelity was 93.86%<br />
(range from 91.675 to 96.8%).<br />
Outcomes<br />
Language Age<br />
(years:m<strong>on</strong>ths)/<br />
O<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r Info.<br />
66 / Educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> Training in Developmental Disabilities-March 2008<br />
No functi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
language<br />
Developmental<br />
Age/IQ/<br />
O<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r Info. Diagnosis<br />
54IQ<br />
(Developmental<br />
ProfileII)<br />
for1child,<br />
N/Afor1child<br />
<strong>Autism</strong><br />
Participants’ communicati<strong>on</strong> outcomes were<br />
measured in all <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> studies using a range of<br />
data collecti<strong>on</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> a range of re-