necessary in video modeling for such students (Sigafoos et al.). Furthermore, literature <strong>on</strong> skill-based instructi<strong>on</strong> indicates that pers<strong>on</strong>s with developmental disabilities acquire skills when tasks are presented in small increments, multiple opportunities are provided to perform the steps, <strong>and</strong> when using various prompting <strong>and</strong> fading strategies (see Giangreco, 2011; Snell, 2007). Thus, the video prompting strategy might be more useful for pers<strong>on</strong>s with moderate <strong>and</strong> severe developmental disabilities. Several literature reviews have been c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>on</strong> video modeling studies with pers<strong>on</strong>s with autism <strong>and</strong> other developmental disabilities (see Baker, Lang, & O’Reilly, 2009; Bellini & Akullian, 2007; Delano, 2007; Coy & Hermarisen, 2007; Rayner, Denholm, & Sigafoos, 2009; Shukla-Mehta, Miller, & Callahan, 2010). Results across reviews overwhelmingly indicate that video modeling strategies are useful in teaching social, communicati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> self-care skills for individuals with autism <strong>and</strong> other developmental disabilities. Since the 1990s there have been numerous studies c<strong>on</strong>ducted using the video prompting strategy to teach various skills to pers<strong>on</strong>s with developmental disabilities. However, no review has been found that specifically analyzed video prompting studies. It is therefore important that practiti<strong>on</strong>ers <strong>and</strong> researchers have the current knowledge base about the video prompting strategy. Thus, we c<strong>on</strong>ducted the review of video prompting studies that were c<strong>on</strong>ducted with pers<strong>on</strong>s with developmental disabilities. Specifically, we answered the following questi<strong>on</strong>s in this study: (a) was video prompting an effective method for teaching skills to pers<strong>on</strong>s with developmental disabilities?; (b) was the video prompting strategy more effective compared to other interventi<strong>on</strong>s?; (c) were the skills learned through video prompting maintained in the absence of interventi<strong>on</strong>?; (d) were the skills learned through video prompting generalized across settings, pers<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>and</strong>/or behaviors?; <strong>and</strong>, (e) what was the social validity of the video prompting strategy? Method We searched EBSCO databases which included PsychInfo, ERIC, Social Science Index, <strong>and</strong> Psychological Abstracts using the following terms: video <strong>and</strong> interventi<strong>on</strong>, video prompting, video modeling, video instructi<strong>on</strong>, developmental disabilities, intellectual disabilities, mental retardati<strong>on</strong>, autism, technology, teaching strategies, <strong>and</strong> multimedia instructi<strong>on</strong>. We selected studies that met the following criteria: (a) researchers implemented the video prompting interventi<strong>on</strong>, (b) studies included at least <strong>on</strong>e or more participants with developmental disabilities, <strong>and</strong> (c) published in a peer-reviewed journal between years 1990 <strong>and</strong> 2010. We also c<strong>on</strong>ducted an ancestral search for additi<strong>on</strong>al studies under the reference secti<strong>on</strong> of each study that we found. Overall, we selected 18 studies that met our criteria. We analyzed the selected studies <strong>on</strong> several variables including the demographics, target skills, designs, interventi<strong>on</strong> effectiveness, maintenance, generalizati<strong>on</strong>, social validity, etc. Table 1 provides a detailed summary of the several variables that were analyzed. Results Participants The 18 studies included 68 participants. All participants were diagnosed with intellectual disability/mental retardati<strong>on</strong> ranging from mild to severe. A majority of participants were diagnosed with a moderate intellectual disability except for <strong>on</strong>e who was diagnosed with severe intellectual disability (see Grice & Blampied, 1994). In additi<strong>on</strong>, some participants were diagnosed with additi<strong>on</strong>al disabilities such as autism, ADHD, physical disabilities, Down Syndrome, Aspergers, behavior disorder, Tourette, seizures, <strong>and</strong> Williams Syndrome. Participants’ ages ranged from 8 years to 41 years, with an average age of 21.5 years. Settings Researchers have c<strong>on</strong>ducted studies in various settings, including: a special school for students with intellectual disabilities (Grice & Blampied, 1994); resource room/self-c<strong>on</strong>tained classrooms (Graves, Collins, Schuster, & Kleinert, 2005; Norman, Collins, & Schuster, 2001); a c<strong>on</strong>ference room in a high school (Mechling, Gast, & Barthold, 2003); a home living room in a high school (Mechling, Gast, Video Prompting <strong>and</strong> <strong>Developmental</strong> <strong>Disabilities</strong> / 515
TABLE 1 Video Prompting Studies C<strong>on</strong>ducted with Pers<strong>on</strong>s with <strong>Developmental</strong> <strong>Disabilities</strong> Participants Effective/Not Effective Mode of Presentati<strong>on</strong> Setting Target Skill Design Age Disability Author Computer Yes for all Multiple probe across subjects with alternating treatment Putting away grocery Table setting Kitchen of a vocati<strong>on</strong>al center Mild ID, AUT Mod. ID, AUT Mod. ID Asperger, Mod. ID Mild ID, AUT Mod. ID, AUT 27 y 28 y 32 y 36 y Cannela-Mal<strong>on</strong>e et al. (2006) 36 y 41 y Yes, as effective as using static picture 5-ft, 8-in. screen projected from an Eps<strong>on</strong> Powerlite S1 Adapted alternating treatment Using debit card to withdraw m<strong>on</strong>ey from ATM to buy items Classroom <strong>and</strong> grocery store Mod. ID Mod. ID Mod. ID Mod. ID Mild. ID 11 y 12 y 12 y 12 y 12 y 11 y Cihak, et al. (2006) Mod. ID Computer 1 subject reached criteri<strong>on</strong> with VP al<strong>on</strong>e. All reached criteri<strong>on</strong> with VP plus error correcti<strong>on</strong> Setting table Multiple baseline across participants Dining area of vocati<strong>on</strong>al center AUT, Mod. MR Mod. MR AUT, Mild MR AUT, Mod. MR 33 y Goods<strong>on</strong> et al. (2007) 36 y 36 y 34 y VCR, TV Yes, 2 of 3 target skills Cooking Multiple probe across Behaviors Kitchen area of classroom Mod. ID Mod. ID Graves et al. (2005) 16 y 18 y 516 / Educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> Training in <strong>Autism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Developmental</strong> <strong>Disabilities</strong>-December 2011 Mod. ID 20 y Yes, 2 participants with VP Third participant with VP least to most prompt Laundry skills Multiple baseline across participants Laundry room in a group home MR, AUT DD, ADHD MR, AUT, Behavior Disorder Horn et al. (2008) 29 y 17 y 25 y
- Page 1 and 2: Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 3 and 4: March 2012 Manuscripts Accepted for
- Page 5 and 6: new line of research, the review ho
- Page 7 and 8: TABLE 1—(Continued) Overview of H
- Page 9 and 10: TABLE 1—(Continued) Overview of H
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 1. MP3 Player (Model: SM-320
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 3. Sony-Ericsson K800. Retri
- Page 15 and 16: computer with three middle school s
- Page 17 and 18: Figure 6. Video iPod. Apple, Inc. h
- Page 19 and 20: example, in contrast to previous st
- Page 21 and 22: using public transportation. Device
- Page 23 and 24: accessible software to increase ind
- Page 25 and 26: (14.3%), a unique curriculum (13.8%
- Page 27 and 28: TABLE 1 Student Characteristics Stu
- Page 29 and 30: eos” was highlighted. Students th
- Page 31 and 32: ment was 100% for baseline and main
- Page 33 and 34: Figure 3. Percentage of independent
- Page 35 and 36: how to program and operate the equi
- Page 37 and 38: Individuals with Disabilities Educa
- Page 39: Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 43 and 44: TABLE 1—(Continued) Video Prompti
- Page 45 and 46: Length of video clips. Researchers
- Page 47 and 48: to learn three cooking tasks. Resul
- Page 49 and 50: Van Laarhoven and Van Laarhoven-Mye
- Page 51 and 52: Dogoe, M., & Banda, D. R. (2009). R
- Page 53 and 54: Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 55 and 56: TABLE 1 Summary of Demographic and
- Page 57 and 58: TABLE 2 Summary of Outcome Variable
- Page 59 and 60: with students in preschool (Akmanog
- Page 61 and 62: with MoID acquiring some of their p
- Page 63 and 64: Vocational task. To date one study
- Page 65 and 66: ed; thereby adding to the amount of
- Page 67 and 68: Retardation and Developmental Disab
- Page 69 and 70: Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 71 and 72: TABLE 1 Student Demographic Informa
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 1. Example of the mini-poste
- Page 75 and 76: Experimental Design This study empl
- Page 77 and 78: intervention sessions was 75.55% de
- Page 79 and 80: help continue maximum skill profici
- Page 81 and 82: Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 83 and 84: at the same time, or did not respon
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 1. Correct responses for Joe
- Page 87 and 88: sponses for each skill. No trends w
- Page 89 and 90: then be used as a template for quic
- Page 91 and 92:
2007). Choice making initiates the
- Page 93 and 94:
making choices is clearly not in th
- Page 95 and 96:
epeated until stable choice pattern
- Page 97 and 98:
transportation, commitment) to prov
- Page 99 and 100:
can be made. Last, because consumer
- Page 101 and 102:
Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 103 and 104:
TABLE 1 Studies Listed According to
- Page 105 and 106:
TABLE 1—(Continued) Studies Liste
- Page 107 and 108:
TABLE 1—(Continued) Studies Liste
- Page 109 and 110:
TABLE 1—(Continued) Studies Liste
- Page 111 and 112:
(i.e., MSW) and duration-based (i.e
- Page 113 and 114:
2008), and increasing adaptive beha
- Page 115 and 116:
port difficulty implementing the in
- Page 117 and 118:
of a preferred item while continuin
- Page 119 and 120:
Kreiner, J., & Flexer, R. (2009). A
- Page 121 and 122:
Education and Training in Autism an
- Page 123 and 124:
autism on the CARS. Regarding socia
- Page 125 and 126:
other effect size measures and with
- Page 127 and 128:
quests during baseline sessions. Du
- Page 129 and 130:
ulation was generally clear and he
- Page 131 and 132:
communication training as a treatme
- Page 133 and 134:
encing allergy symptoms (one partic
- Page 135 and 136:
Assessments Preference assessment.
- Page 137 and 138:
Interobserver agreement. A second o
- Page 139 and 140:
challenging behavior in the presess
- Page 141 and 142:
tion of the preferred item signaled
- Page 143 and 144:
ior: An analysis of the literature.
- Page 145 and 146:
moderate intellectual disabilities
- Page 147 and 148:
Effects of the STAR intervention pr
- Page 149 and 150:
Copeland, S. R. (2002). See citatio
- Page 151 and 152:
126. Ezell, D., & Klein, C. (2003).
- Page 153 and 154:
computer-based instruction program.
- Page 155 and 156:
sight words to students with mental
- Page 157 and 158:
Mastropieri, M. A. (2009). See cita
- Page 159 and 160:
262. Noyes, D. A., & Sax, C. L. (20
- Page 161 and 162:
Rispoli, M. (2009). See citation #1
- Page 163 and 164:
Sparks, S. (2010). See citation #87
- Page 165 and 166:
Vlaskamp, C. (2008). See citation #
- Page 167 and 168:
INDEX—VOLUME 46,
- Page 169 and 170:
Runes, Sandra. See Hausmann-Stabile
- Page 171 and 172:
Review of video prompting studies w
- Page 173 and 174:
Look! I'm in College! DVD Look, I
- Page 175 and 176:
13th International Conference on Au