etadd_46(4) - Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities

Allman, M. J. (2009). On the correspondence
between preference assessment outcomes and
progressive-ratio schedule assessment of stimulus
value. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 729–
733.
Didden, R., Korzilius, H., Kamphuis, A., Sturmey, P.,
Lancioni, G., & Curfs, L. M. G. (2006). Preferences
in individuals with angelman syndrome assessed
by a modified choice assessment scale. Journal
of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 54–60.
Didden, R., Korzilius, H., Sturmey, P., Lancioni, G.,
& Curfs, L. M. G. (2008). Preference for waterrelated
items in angelman syndrome, down syndrome,
and non-specific intellectual disability.
Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 33,
59–64.
Dixon, M. R., & Falcomata, T. S. (2004). Preference
for progressive delays and concurrent physical
therapy exercise in an adult with acquired brain
injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 101–
105.
Dozier, C. L., Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Borrero,
C. S., Rapp, J. T., Bourret, J., & Guiterrez, A.
(2007). Assessment of preference for behavioral
versus baseline conditions. Behavioral Interventions,
22, 245–261.
Fisher, W. W., Adelinis, J. D., Volkert, V. M., Keeney,
K. M., Neidert, P. L., & Hovanetz, A. (2005).
Assessing preferences for positive and negative
reinforcement during treatment of destructive
behavior with functional communication training.
Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 153–
168.
Fleming, C. V., Wheeler, G. M., Cannella-Malone,
H. I., Basbaill, A. R., Chung, Y. C., & Graham-Day,
K. (2010). An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to
measure preference of individuals with severe
physical and developmental disabilities. Developmental
Neurorehabilitation, 13, 266–275.
Glover, A. C., Roane, H. S., Kadey, H. J., & Grow,
L. L. (2008). Preference for reinforcers under
progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: A comparison
of single and concurrent arrangements. Journal
of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 163–176.
Graff, R. B., & Gibson, L. (2003). Using pictures to
assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental
disabilities. Behavior Modification, 27, 470–483.
Graff, R. B., Gibson, L., & Galiasatos, G. T. (2006).
The impact of high- and low-preference stimuli
on vocational and academic performances of
youths with severe disabilities. Journal of Applied
Behavior Analysis, 39, 131–135.
Groskreutz, M. P., & Graff, R. B. (2009). Evaluating
pictorial preference assessment: The effect of differential
outcomes on preference assessment results.
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 113–
128.
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., Lindberg, J. S., & Con-
ners, J. (2003). Response-restriction analysis: I.
assessment of activity preferences. Journal of Applied
Behavior Analysis, 36, 47–58.
Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., &
Maglieri, K. A. (2005). On the effectiveness of
and preference for punishment and extinction
components of function-based interventions. Journal
of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 51–65.
Harding, J. W., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Barretto,
A., & Lee, J. F. (2005). An evaluation of choice
responding during assessment and treatment of
problem behavior. European Journal of Behavior
Analysis, 6, 145–164.
Harding, J. W., Wacker, D. P., Berg, W. K., Winborn-
Kemmerer, L., & Lee, J. F. (2009). Evaluation of
choice allocation between positive and negative
reinforcement during functional communication
training with young children. Journal of Developmental
and Physical Disabilities, 21, 443–456.
Hoch, H., McComas, J. J., Johnson, L., Faranda, N.,
Guenther, S. L. (2002). The effects of magnitude
and quality of reinforcement on choice responding
during play activities. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 35, 171–181.
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G.,
Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of singlesubject
research to identify evidence-based practice
in special education. Exceptional Children, 71,
165–179.
Horrocks, E. L., & Morgan, R. L. (2009). Comparison
of a video-based assessment and a multiple
stimulus assessment to identify preferred jobs for
individuals with significant intellectual disabilities.
Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 902–
909.
Humenik, A., Curran, J., Luiselli, J. K., & Child, S. N.
(2008). Intervention for self-injury in a child with
autism: Effects of choice and continuous access to
preferred stimuli. Behavioral Development Bulletin,
14, 17–22.
Keen, D., & Pennell, D. (2010). Evaluating and
engagement-based preference assessment for
children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum
Disorders, 4, 645–652.
Kerr, N., Meyerson, L., & Flora, J., (1977). The
measurement of motor, visual and auditory discrimination
skills. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 95–
112.
Kodak, T., Fisher, W. W., Kelley, M. E., & Kisamore,
A. (2009). Comparing preference assessments:
Selection- versus duration- based preference assessment
procedures. Research in Developmental Disabilities,
30, 1068–1077.
Kodak, T., Lerman, D. C., Volkert, V. M., & Trosclair,
N. (2007). Further examination of factors
that influence preference for positive versus negative
reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 40, 25–44.
Review of Choice and Preference Assessment / 593