Samish Reply Brief - Turtle Talk
Samish Reply Brief - Turtle Talk
Samish Reply Brief - Turtle Talk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
United States v. Angle, 760 F. Supp. 1366 (E.D. Cal. 1991), rev'd on other<br />
grounds, Wackerman Dairy, Inc. v. Wilson, 7 F. 3d 891 (9 th Cir. 1993) ….... 16, 17<br />
United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974, aff'd, 520 F. 2d<br />
676 (9 th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423. U.S. 1086 (1976) ("Washington I")….24, 26<br />
United States v. Washington, 476 F. Supp. 1101 (W.D.Wash. 1979) ("Washington<br />
II"), aff'd, 641 F. 2d 1368 (9 th Cir. 1981) ("Washington III"), cert. denied, 454 U.S.<br />
1143 (1982)…………………………………………………………… 3, 23, 25, 27<br />
United States v. Washington, 973 F. Supp. 1422 (W.D.Wash. 1994)…………… 10<br />
Statutes<br />
25 U.S.C. § 81 .................................................................................................... 27<br />
5 U.S.C. § 706 ................................................................................................20, 21<br />
Rules<br />
Case: 08-35794 01/29/2009 Page: 4 of 36 DktEntry: 6789840<br />
25 C.F.R. § 83-1 . ................................................................................................ 13<br />
25 C.F.R. § 83.7 .............................................................................................13, 15<br />
25 C.F.R. Part 89.40 …………………………………………………………….. 28<br />
25 C.F.R. Part 151 ………………………………………………………………. 13<br />
25 C.F.R. Part 292 ………………………………………………………………. 13<br />
F.R.C.P 60(6) ………………………………………………………………..6, 8, 9<br />
F.R.C.P. Rule 60 (b) (6) ..............................................................4, 5, 6-7, 8, 14, 28<br />
Other Authority<br />
46 Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments, §76 ………………………………………...………. 17<br />
iii
Change language