View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
FIGDRE5.11 INVOLVEMENTOFAMPUTEESIN lHEIRDISCHARGEPLANNING IDYesI liNG Figure 5.11 shows that most amputees were involved in their discharge planning (21) 840/", and only (4) 16% were not involved. The results indicate thatthe majority ofthe amputees had enough pn:plllation for discharge, which may enable them to cope well with theirdisabilities at home. 5.6.2 ITEM27 OTHERPEOPLE THATWERE Th'VOLVED IN DISCHARGEPLANl\'lNG TABLE5.15 OTHER.PEOPLETHATWEREINVOLVEDINIDSCHARGEPLANNING Otherpeopleinvolved in discharge planning Frequency Percentage Spouse 3 12 Family 18 72 No oneinvolved 4 16 Total 25 100 Table 5.15 indicates that family members were mostly involved in discharge planning, (18) 720/", follewedbythe spouse (3) 13%, and(4) 16%where no onewasinvolved. This is a signthat amputees werewell supportedby family members, except those whohadno family members to support them; these patients reported that family members were too far awayto support them. InvolVement offamiIy members in planning for discharge is an important rehabilitative strategy to ensure continuity ofcare at home in order to prevent complications. Ndlovu(1998:20) states thatwith the supportfrom amputees' families and 65
- Page 33 and 34: Itis the duty ofthe social worker a
- Page 35 and 36: 2.5.3 STAFF A(((rUDES An examinatio
- Page 37 and 38: the only solution in the study that
- Page 39 and 40: small and large groups. and social
- Page 41 and 42: esponsibilities in positions they o
- Page 43 and 44: what muses do with and for individu
- Page 45 and 46: 3.4.8 TIME Time refers to the seque
- Page 47 and 48: 3.5.3 MODIFIED CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
- Page 49 and 50: image. In this way psychological ad
- Page 51 and 52: 4.1 INTRODUcrrON In this chapter th
- Page 53 and 54: as it is a useful self-report instr
- Page 55: 4.6 VALIDITY Al'o'DRELIABILITY The
- Page 59 and 60: caused by accidents. As far as reha
- Page 61: more ofthese respondents were from
- Page 64 and 65: The members ofthe rehabilitation te
- Page 66 and 67: ehabilitation team, to meet other b
- Page 68 and 69: Pffi'SICAL CARE This item was inclu
- Page 70 and 71: used correctly. Hodkinson, Smith an
- Page 72 and 73: time to be visited by old coping am
- Page 74 and 75: TABLE 5.14 F1NA.l\(CIAL msroav Fina
- Page 76 and 77: 5.5.8 ITEM' 19 RESPONDENTS WHO MANA
- Page 78: they were fit for their old work or
- Page 81: not be effectivelyproductive atwork
- Page 85 and 86: 5.6.4 ITEM 29 MEMBERS OF THE TEAM I
- Page 88 and 89: 5.7.3 ITEM 32 MEMBERS OF THE REHABI
- Page 90: 5.7.5 ITEM 34 PROGRESS MONITORING T
- Page 93 and 94: eported that the door was too small
- Page 96 and 97: 5.9.4 ITEM40 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
- Page 98 and 99: station. These were amputees with l
- Page 100 and 101: S.Il.2 ITEM 44 PROVISION OF REHABIL
- Page 102 and 103: 5.12 SECTION K: PROBLEMS El'iCOlJNT
- Page 104: 6.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 6 SUMMARY,
- Page 107 and 108: 6. 6. It re th si In 6. T w amputee
- Page 109 and 110: • Fifty-one (51) of the amputees
- Page 111 and 112: • In spite of the support by fami
- Page 113 and 114: • Seventeen (17) 68% amputees wer
- Page 115 and 116: • Three (3) 12% amputees traveled
- Page 117 and 118: SHELTERED EMPLOYMENT After work ass
- Page 119 and 120: DEPRESSION Depression was another p
- Page 121 and 122: 6.5.4 OBJECTIVE 4 To make recommend
- Page 123 and 124: Home trial leave should be granted
- Page 125 and 126: BmLIOGRAPHY 1. Brink, H. 1996. Fund
- Page 127 and 128: 28. Vlok, ME. 1995. Manual Of Commu
- Page 129 and 130: 15. Mbeki, ToM 1997. White Paper On
- Page 131 and 132: MrTromp Secretary: Department ofHea
FIGDRE5.11 INVOLVEMENTOFAMPUTEESIN lHEIRDISCHARGEPLANNING<br />
IDYesI<br />
liNG<br />
Figure 5.11 shows that most amputees were involved in their discharge planning (21)<br />
840/", and only (4) 16% were not involved. The results indicate thatthe majority <strong>of</strong>the<br />
amputees had enough pn:plllation for discharge, which may enable them to cope well<br />
with theirdisabilities at home.<br />
5.6.2 ITEM27 OTHERPEOPLE THATWERE Th'VOLVED IN<br />
DISCHARGEPLANl\'lNG<br />
TABLE5.15 OTHER.PEOPLETHATWEREINVOLVEDINIDSCHARGEPLANNING<br />
Otherpeopleinvolved in discharge planning Frequency Percentage<br />
Spouse 3 12<br />
Family 18 72<br />
No oneinvolved 4 16<br />
Total 25 100<br />
Table 5.15 indicates that family members were mostly involved in discharge planning,<br />
(18) 720/", follewedbythe spouse (3) 13%, and(4) 16%where no onewasinvolved. This<br />
is a signthat amputees werewell supportedby family members, except those whohadno<br />
family members to support them; these patients reported that family members were too<br />
far awayto support them. InvolVement <strong>of</strong>famiIy members in planning for discharge is an<br />
important rehabilitative strategy to ensure continuity <strong>of</strong>care at home in order to prevent<br />
complications. Ndlovu(1998:20) states thatwith the supportfrom amputees' families and<br />
65