View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
they were fit for their old work or they required a change to lighter duty, and to find the reason that preventedother amputees from resmning work. FIGURE 5.7 WORK ASSESSMENTTO DETERMINE WHEIHER AMPUTEESCOULD RnURNTO [HEIRWORK IJ Respondents whowere not assessed for work EIRespondents whowere assessed for work 52% Figure 5.7 indicates that (13) 52% respondents were not assessed for work compared to (12) 48% respondents who were assessed. Work assessment and placement in suitable employment either in the open labour market or a sheltered.workshop to add to the disability grant is important Gilles (1999:248) supports this statement by saying that correct placement ofthe persons with disabilities is ofparamount importance ensuring that he is effective in his job and remains with the company. Gilles (1999:252) further adds that a physical impairment need not affect one's life style, and with the right aids and facilities, someone with an impairment may function just as productive in the community as someone who is able bodied. 5.5.11 ITEMn RETRAINING Inclusion of this item was to ascertain whether amputees that were assessed for work, were trained to go back to their previous work, as they had not been working for a long time and are now using a prosthesis. This makes the situation before amputation different from the situation after amputation, even if amputees return to their old work. Powel (1989:56) suppmts thisstatement that there is a great need for investigating occupational 60
- Page 28 and 29: 2.2.5 ACCESS TO HOME AND COMMUNITY
- Page 30 and 31: 2.3 PSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION Ku
- Page 33 and 34: Itis the duty ofthe social worker a
- Page 35 and 36: 2.5.3 STAFF A(((rUDES An examinatio
- Page 37 and 38: the only solution in the study that
- Page 39 and 40: small and large groups. and social
- Page 41 and 42: esponsibilities in positions they o
- Page 43 and 44: what muses do with and for individu
- Page 45 and 46: 3.4.8 TIME Time refers to the seque
- Page 47 and 48: 3.5.3 MODIFIED CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
- Page 49 and 50: image. In this way psychological ad
- Page 51 and 52: 4.1 INTRODUcrrON In this chapter th
- Page 53 and 54: as it is a useful self-report instr
- Page 55: 4.6 VALIDITY Al'o'DRELIABILITY The
- Page 59 and 60: caused by accidents. As far as reha
- Page 61: more ofthese respondents were from
- Page 64 and 65: The members ofthe rehabilitation te
- Page 66 and 67: ehabilitation team, to meet other b
- Page 68 and 69: Pffi'SICAL CARE This item was inclu
- Page 70 and 71: used correctly. Hodkinson, Smith an
- Page 72 and 73: time to be visited by old coping am
- Page 74 and 75: TABLE 5.14 F1NA.l\(CIAL msroav Fina
- Page 76 and 77: 5.5.8 ITEM' 19 RESPONDENTS WHO MANA
- Page 80 and 81: FIGURE S.9 CATEGORIESOF BEHABILIrAl
- Page 83 and 84: FIGDRE5.11 INVOLVEMENTOFAMPUTEESIN
- Page 85 and 86: 5.6.4 ITEM 29 MEMBERS OF THE TEAM I
- Page 88 and 89: 5.7.3 ITEM 32 MEMBERS OF THE REHABI
- Page 90: 5.7.5 ITEM 34 PROGRESS MONITORING T
- Page 93 and 94: eported that the door was too small
- Page 96 and 97: 5.9.4 ITEM40 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
- Page 98 and 99: station. These were amputees with l
- Page 100 and 101: S.Il.2 ITEM 44 PROVISION OF REHABIL
- Page 102 and 103: 5.12 SECTION K: PROBLEMS El'iCOlJNT
- Page 104: 6.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 6 SUMMARY,
- Page 107 and 108: 6. 6. It re th si In 6. T w amputee
- Page 109 and 110: • Fifty-one (51) of the amputees
- Page 111 and 112: • In spite of the support by fami
- Page 113 and 114: • Seventeen (17) 68% amputees wer
- Page 115 and 116: • Three (3) 12% amputees traveled
- Page 117 and 118: SHELTERED EMPLOYMENT After work ass
- Page 119 and 120: DEPRESSION Depression was another p
- Page 121 and 122: 6.5.4 OBJECTIVE 4 To make recommend
- Page 123 and 124: Home trial leave should be granted
- Page 125 and 126: BmLIOGRAPHY 1. Brink, H. 1996. Fund
- Page 127 and 128: 28. Vlok, ME. 1995. Manual Of Commu
they were fit for their old work or they required a change to lighter duty, and to find the<br />
reason that preventedother amputees from resmning work.<br />
FIGURE 5.7 WORK ASSESSMENTTO DETERMINE WHEIHER AMPUTEESCOULD<br />
RnURNTO [HEIRWORK<br />
IJ Respondents<br />
whowere not<br />
assessed for<br />
work<br />
EIRespondents<br />
whowere<br />
assessed for<br />
work<br />
52%<br />
Figure 5.7 indicates that (13) 52% respondents were not assessed for work compared to<br />
(12) 48% respondents who were assessed. Work assessment and placement in suitable<br />
employment either in the open labour market or a sheltered.workshop to add to the<br />
disability grant is important Gilles (1999:248) supports this statement by saying that<br />
correct placement <strong>of</strong>the persons with disabilities is <strong>of</strong>paramount importance ensuring<br />
that he is effective in his job and remains with the company. Gilles (1999:252) further<br />
adds that a physical impairment need not affect one's life style, and with the right aids<br />
and facilities, someone with an impairment may function just as productive in the<br />
community as someone who is able bodied.<br />
5.5.11 ITEMn RETRAINING<br />
Inclusion <strong>of</strong> this item was to ascertain whether amputees that were assessed for work,<br />
were trained to go back to their previous work, as they had not been working for a long<br />
time and are now using a prosthesis. This makes the situation before amputation different<br />
from the situation after amputation, even if amputees return to their old work. Powel<br />
(1989:56) suppmts thisstatement that there is a great need for investigating occupational<br />
60
Change language