31.07.2013 Views

1 - American Memory

1 - American Memory

1 - American Memory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28<br />

ment fails to act to provide relief, then there is something wrong<br />

with the system of government under which we all live.<br />

We are not asking for favoritism. We ask only that the Congress of<br />

the United States recognize our unique situation and grant Hawaii<br />

the same protection to its surface transportation that other United<br />

States cities and States enjoy. We are not second-class citizens and we<br />

will not stand still while we are denied equal rights and protection<br />

under the law.<br />

Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, I deeply believe that<br />

the case for Federal legislation to protect Hawaii from shipping stop-<br />

pages is a conclusive one. And in that light, I am compelled to call to<br />

your attention what I believe to be a serious deficiency in the bill as<br />

presently written.<br />

In defining the term "interrupt normal shipping," the only refer-<br />

ence is to stoppages occurring at west coast ports. There is no men-<br />

tion of stoppages occurring from the closing of Hawaii docks and we<br />

must therefore assume that dock tieups in Hawaii would not be cov-<br />

ered by the provisions of this bill.<br />

I thmk I am speaking for all the people of Hawaii when I say that<br />

it seems to make little sense to protect us from a bullet in the head<br />

while, at the same time, we are left as vulnerable as ever to a bullet in<br />

the heart.<br />

Surely, if the intent of this measure is to protect our people from an<br />

interruption of normal shipping, Hawaii ports should be specifically<br />

included in the bill.<br />

I can see no reason why a fair and equitable solution cannot be<br />

found to this problem. The shipping unions in Hawaii are responsible<br />

organizations headed by reasonable men—men who realize that ship-<br />

ping stoppages hurt their members and the families of their members<br />

just as much as the rest of the population.<br />

I know that I speak for the people of the city and country of Hono-<br />

lulu and the State of Hawaii when I urge all of you to give favorable<br />

consideration to House bill 7189 at the earliest possible time. I say the<br />

earliest possible time because Hawaii has picked itself off the canvas<br />

twice in the past 2 years, and the present agreement between the<br />

ILWU and the PMA expires on June 30. Should another strike take<br />

place, our economy simply cannot hold up as well. It would take us<br />

years to recover from the next serious shipping stoppage.<br />

I say to all of you, please don't let this happen to Hawaii again.<br />

Pass House bill 7189 and protect our lifeline.<br />

I would like to add, I think the gentlemen of Congress and the<br />

Senate have got to be more pragmatic. As Congressman Kuykendall<br />

mentioned, you can argue the legalities of any bill but the f a«t remains,<br />

gentlemen, you have a sovereign State of the United States completely<br />

isolated every time you have a strike, something that would not be<br />

tolerated within any mainland State in the United States. To me this<br />

is rank discrimination and we are long overdue for congressional action<br />

to overcome the situation. Thank you very much.<br />

Mr. JARMAN. Mr. Mayor, as t understand. H.R. 7189, it effects a<br />

strike or a lockout in a longshore or maritime industry in the State of<br />

Washington, Oregon, and California, and this legislative proposal<br />

would have no effect on a strike actually called in Hawaii; would it?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!