31.07.2013 Views

1 - American Memory

1 - American Memory

1 - American Memory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2BS<br />

bers work under Intolerable conditions for 8 months without the right to strike<br />

When S. 1566, the Senate version of H.B. 7189, was debated on the floor of the<br />

Senate, Sen. John Tunney stated "In the <strong>American</strong> labor movement the right to<br />

strike is sacred, and justifiably so. Without it <strong>American</strong> workers would not enjoy<br />

the good wages and working conditions that prevail today. S. 1566, if passed<br />

would seriously jeopardize that right to strike." '<br />

I have requested that the adverse report of the Committee on Labor and Public<br />

Welfare, United States Senate, on S. 1566, Senate Report #93-941, be included<br />

as a part of this hearing record. It establishes that in 1971-72 when we struck<br />

against our employers, at no time was the health, safety or welfare of the state<br />

of Hawaii in jeopardy, and in that report we refer you to Page 92 (Excerpts from<br />

hearings before the Merchant Marine Subcommittee, 92nd Congress, 2nd Session,<br />

Jan. 18, 19, 20, 1972 on S. 2836, entitled "Hawaiian Public Interest Protection<br />

Act 1971") statement of Dr. Sherrel Mark, Director, Department of Planning<br />

and Economic Development, State of Hawaii. He said, "Considering these factors,<br />

we see that the Hawaiian economy was able to endure the adverse impact of the<br />

strike. Most businesses were able to make the necessary adjustments, carry on<br />

operations : For example, use air cargo, find new sources of supply or distribution,<br />

shorten the work week, or have employees take their vacations sooner.<br />

"Now, maritime shipping strikes can severely disrupt the economy and inflict<br />

hardships on particular sectors of the economy. When of long duration, they can<br />

even lead to a complete showdown of the economy, resulting in intolerable rates<br />

of unemployment and serious losses in revenues, incomes, and proflts. Obviously,<br />

everything that can be done to prevent strikes should be tried. Yet, despite their<br />

adverse impact, it is important that the principle of collective bargaining be left<br />

intact. The operation of a private enterprise economy requires that decisions be<br />

made in the marketplace and/or at the bargaining table, and that no side, neither<br />

labor nor management, be forced to accept terms that are unfavorable or have<br />

a settiement imposed because the power or possibility of a strike is diluted<br />

through immediate, direct Federal intervention."<br />

The above-mentioned Senate Labor Committee report states: "In short, the<br />

Senate Labor Committee is not pursuaded that 'any dispute' In the West Coast<br />

maritime or longshore industries 'automatically imperils the health and well<br />

being of the people of Hawaii and the United States Pacific Islands," as stated in<br />

S. 1566. Accordingly, it cannot support legislation of this type."<br />

The proponents of this Bill are asking for exceptional privileges. They are<br />

requesting that the state of Hawaii be guaranteed by Federal law that they<br />

will never be afTected by strike action of any kind where commerce to or from<br />

the Islands is concerned, certainly for 8 months. This, of course, enhances the<br />

position of the two steamship companies, Matson Navigation Company and The<br />

United States Lines, which are engaged in commerce to and from the state of<br />

Hawaii. This type of regional injuncttve powers under Federal control has al-<br />

ways been opposed by the entire labor movement. S. 1566 was opposed by the<br />

National AFT/-CIO. the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the United<br />

Automobile Workers, the AFL-CTO M'>ritime Committee and the AFL-CIO Mari-<br />

time Trades Department, in addition to our opposition.<br />

We urge. Chairman Dingell, that this Committee reject this legislation In<br />

the interest of free collective bargaining.<br />

MATSON NAVIOATION CO.,<br />

Washington, D.C., September 27, i974.<br />

Hon. JOHN JASMAN.<br />

Chairman, Bouse Subcommittee on Transportation and Aeronautics,<br />

Washington, B.C.<br />

DEAK MR. CHAIRMAN : I submit the following statement on behalf of Matson<br />

Navigation Company in support of H.R. 7189 and request that the statement be<br />

made a part of the hearing record.<br />

Matson is a common carrier of property by water and has operated as such<br />

in the U.S. Pacific Coast-Hawaii trade for 92 years: In April of this year Matson<br />

extended its common carrier container operations to Include the U.S. Pacific<br />

Coast-Guam trade. In both instances it operates a dedicated service in the sense<br />

that its ves.sels and operation's are concerned soley with providing the ocean<br />

transportation n»eds of Hawaii nnd Guam without involvement in other trades.<br />

Its total operation Involves a full range of container services for general com-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!