31.07.2013 Views

1 - American Memory

1 - American Memory

1 - American Memory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

242<br />

nfTBODTTCnON<br />

In the early spring of 1962, a survey completed at tbe reqnest of former GkiTer-<br />

nor Quinn indicated that the people of Hawaii might face severe food shortages<br />

because of the maritime strike in progress. Survey results indicated that a two<br />

days' supply of rice and a seven days' supply of evaporated milk were in stock<br />

in retailers' and wholesalers' facilities and on strike-bound ships in Honolulu<br />

Harbor. Other food items were in somewhat better supply but nevertheless the<br />

situation appeared grave. (See Appendix III for a complete list of the items<br />

inventoried and their status.) The Governor was considering chartering shiiM<br />

to carry critical supplies (in fact the above-mentioned survey included questions<br />

which would enable the Governor's office to allocate the available space to normal<br />

shippers).<br />

It was in this environment that the Budget Session of the First Legislatnre of<br />

the State of Hawaii passed House Resolution No. 100, which requested an investi-<br />

gation into the cost and feasibility of either a state or privately-operated ware-<br />

housing system on state lands on Sand Island. (See Appendix I for H.R. No.<br />

100.)<br />

A basic assumption underlies this resolution: That Hawaii is continually and<br />

almost completely dependent upon a so-called "floating warehouse" system (and<br />

therefore any interruption of shipping or unloading results in a disruption of<br />

trade and commerce within the state and a resultant shortage of critical sup-<br />

plies). The "floating warehouse" concept is taken to mean that Hawaiian bu^-<br />

nessmen maintain little or no extra inventories—relying instead on a continual<br />

replenishment of supplies from the mainland.<br />

This study will consider this basic assumption, as its validity has obvioua<br />

implications. If, in fact, local wholesalers and retailers are using Matson ships<br />

as a floating warehouse, then some way may have to be found for increasing<br />

stocks or assuring more dependable deliveries.<br />

The major thrust of this study will be concerned with the possibility of a stock-<br />

piling solution, if such Is necessary. In other words, extensive discussion of other<br />

possible solutions, e.g. labor legislation or government intervention, will not be<br />

undertaken.<br />

Even before evaluating the "floating warehouse" assumption, we will Investi-<br />

gate the impact of maritime strikes on the State of Hawaii. Superficial question-<br />

ing by the author indicated that no one was really hungry during the 1962 strike.<br />

Thus it seems important to determine if there really Is a problem or whether<br />

public sentiment was unduly ak-oused about the graveness of the situation.<br />

FINAL EVALUATION OP THE FB^ASrBILITT OF A STOCKPILING FBOORAM<br />

(AN INTEGRATING SDMMABY AND CONCLUSION)<br />

The basic thrust of this study has been to investigate the feasibility of the<br />

State of Hawaii encouraging or subsidizing tbe building of stockpiles as a<br />

hedge against the impact of maritime strikes.<br />

Consumers Interested in Stockpiling<br />

The supporters of Rouse Resolution No. 100 correctly read the "pulse" of<br />

voters with respect to their interest in assuring adequate food supplies during<br />

strikes. Seventy-two per cent of those interviewed in the consumer survey con-<br />

ducted as part of this study thought that it was a good idea for the state to<br />

stockpile foods to make sure there would be adequate food supply during any<br />

strike.<br />

Consumers Not Interested If Stockpiling Too Costly<br />

When the Impact of higher inventory costs on prices was mentioned, however,<br />

interest dropped noticeably. In response to the question—"Would you still be<br />

interested If it caused a regular .5 per cent increase in your prices?"—only 40<br />

per cent were still interested and only 14 per cent were still interested If It<br />

caused a regular 10 per cent increase In their prices. In other words, Hawaiian<br />

housewives have a tolerance level—they feel prevention of shortages due to<br />

strikes can become too expensive. It seems probable that consumer support for<br />

a stockpiling program would dissipate if they knew the present and potential<br />

costs of carrying extra Inventories and their impact on consumer prices.<br />

Inventories Already Large Where Feasible<br />

House Resolution No. 100 contemplated building stockpiles on the assumption<br />

that Hawaiian businesses were using Matson ships as "floating warehouses" and<br />

therefore not carrying their own stocks. But as we have seen, a "floating ware-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!