A solution and solid state study of niobium complexes University of ...
A solution and solid state study of niobium complexes University of ... A solution and solid state study of niobium complexes University of ...
Chapter 3 the diffraction pattern of the crystal. The dhkl values can be obtained when the Bragg equation is applied to the diffraction data. 11 3.5.2 Structure factor The structure factor, F(hkl), of any diffracted X-ray (hkl) is the quantity that expresses both the amplitude and the phase of that reflection. The intensity of a diffracted beam is directly related to the amplitude of the structure factor, but the phase must normally be calculated by indirect means. In structure determination, phases are estimated and an initial description of the positions and anisotropic displacements of the scattering atoms is deduced. From this initial model, structure factors are calculated and compared with those experimentally observed. Iterative refinement procedures attempt to minimize the difference between calculation and experiment, until a satisfactory fit has been obtained. The total scattering of all atoms in the unit cell is given as: 12 Fhkl = ∑ exp[i2π(hxj + kyj + lzj) (3.7) where fj = scattering factor of each of the N atoms. This relation may be recast in terms of its amplitude, |F(hkl)|, and its phase angle, φ(hkl) or in terms of its real, A, and imaginary, B components in the following expressions: 13 Fhkl = |Fhkl | exp [i2π φ(hkl)] (3.8) Fhkl = A + iB (3.9) The set of structure factors for all the reflections (hkl) are the primary quantities necessary for the derivation of the three dimensional distribution of electron density. When considering electron density the structure factor can be written as: Fhkl = (x,y,z) exp [i2π(hxn + kyn + lzn)]dV (3.10) 11 R. J. D. Tilley, Crystals and Crystal Structures, Wiley and Sons, New York, 114, 2006. 12 M. F. C. Ladd, R. A. Palmer, Structure Determination by X-ray Crystallography, Plenum Press, New York, 36, 1977. 13 Y. Waseda, E. Matsubara, K. Shinoda, X-ray Diffraction Crystallography, Springer, Heidelberg, 109, 2011. 49
3.5.3 ‘Phase problem’ Chapter 3 In order to form an image from the combined diffracted X-ray beams, 3 factors need to be known; the direction, amplitude and phase of each beam. By identifying the Miller indices of the crystal plane that gives rise to each diffracted beam, the direction of the beam can be specified. The amplitude of the beam can readily be deduced from the measured intensity. There is no practical way to determine the relative phase angles for the diffracted beams and consequently it has to be calculated in an indirect manner. 14 3.5.3.1 Direct method The direct method 15 resolves the approximate reflection phases from measured X-ray intensities via mathematical formulae. The direct method proves most useful for structures consisting only of light atoms. The Patterson function is used with compounds that contain heavier atoms. 3.5.3.2 Patterson method The Patterson function, P(u, v, w), is an auto-correlation function of the density. 16 When referring to the Patterson cell, the coordinates are u, v and w with dimensions identical to the real cell. A plot of the Patterson function delivers a map with peaks that correspond to interatomic vectors. The peak heights are proportional to the product of the two atoms between which the vector is found. From this map the position of the atoms relative to one another and the centre of the unit cell can be obtained. The Patterson peaks are a proportional indication of the size of the atoms involved. P(u,v,w) = V -1 2 ∑F exp[-i2π(hu + kv + lw)] (3.11) 14 nd J. Als-Nielsen, D. McMorrow, Elements of Modern X-ray Physics, 2 Ed, Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, 295, 2011. 15 J. Lima-de-Faria, M. J. Buerger, Historical Atlas of Crystallography, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 93, 1990. 16 nd J. Drenth, Principles of Protein X-ray Crystallography, 2 Ed, Springer, New York, 130, 1999. 50
- Page 9 and 10: Abstract 93 Nb NMR was successfully
- Page 11 and 12: Opsomming 93 Nb KMR is met sukses g
- Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1 metals. 3 Due to Wollasto
- Page 15 and 16: Synopsis... 2. Literature Review of
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 2 Niobium resembles tantalu
- Page 19 and 20: 2.1.2 Uses Chapter 2 Niobium has a
- Page 21 and 22: 2.2 Separation of Nb and Ta 2.2.1 M
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 2 Buachuang et al. 16 repor
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2 Niobium oxide surfaces ex
- Page 27 and 28: 2.4.6 Water absorption Chapter 2 Th
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2 been reported in literatu
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2 containing niobium as the
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2 conclusions, with regard
- Page 35 and 36: Chapter 2 Figure 2.5: Structure of
- Page 37 and 38: 2.6.3.3 [NbCl3O(ttbd) - ] Chapter 2
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 2 (a) (b) Figure 2.10: Stru
- Page 41 and 42: 2.7 Alkoxides Chapter 2 Specific kn
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 2 Reactions of dialkylamid
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 2 other NbCl5-x(OMe)x produ
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 2 In 1991 Lee et al. 83 pub
- Page 49 and 50: EtO EtO EtO EtO Cl Nb Cl Cl Nb Cl R
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 2 The hemicarbonate formed
- Page 53 and 54: Synopsis... 3. Synthesis and Charac
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 3 with γ = magnetogyric ra
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 3 electromagnetic spectrum
- Page 59: 3.5.1 Bragg’s law Chapter 3 Bragg
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 3 A = ∑ ε cl (3.14) In
- Page 65 and 66: Chapter 3 t1/2 = 54 = . 3.7 Sy
- Page 67 and 68: 3.7.2.4 Synthesis of [NbCl4(acac)]:
- Page 69 and 70: 4. Crystallographic Synopsis... Cha
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 4 packages 2 respectively.
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 4 4.3 Crystal Structure of
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 4 longer bonds (C1-C2, C2-C
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 4 Figure 4.5: Packing of [N
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 4 Figure 4.7: Molecular str
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 4 Table 4.5: Selected bond
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 4 Figure 4.11: Molecular st
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 4 Figure 4.12: The phacac p
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 4 Table 4.9: Hydrogen bonds
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 4 According to our knowledg
- Page 91 and 92: 5.2 Experimental procedures 5.2.1 K
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 5 corresponds to one specie
- Page 95 and 96: 5.3 Results and Discussion 5.3.1 Pr
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 5 Figure 5.5: Typical UV/Vi
- Page 99 and 100: 5.3.3 Derivation of the rate law Ch
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 5 The Stopped-flow data (fa
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 5 Figure 5.9: Eyring plot,
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 5 However, more information
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 6 second reaction entailed
- Page 109 and 110: Appendix A Table 1.3: Bond angles (
Chapter 3<br />
the diffraction pattern <strong>of</strong> the crystal. The dhkl values can be obtained when the Bragg<br />
equation is applied to the diffraction data. 11<br />
3.5.2 Structure factor<br />
The structure factor, F(hkl), <strong>of</strong> any diffracted X-ray (hkl) is the quantity that expresses<br />
both the amplitude <strong>and</strong> the phase <strong>of</strong> that reflection. The intensity <strong>of</strong> a diffracted beam<br />
is directly related to the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the structure factor, but the phase must<br />
normally be calculated by indirect means. In structure determination, phases are<br />
estimated <strong>and</strong> an initial description <strong>of</strong> the positions <strong>and</strong> anisotropic displacements <strong>of</strong><br />
the scattering atoms is deduced. From this initial model, structure factors are<br />
calculated <strong>and</strong> compared with those experimentally observed. Iterative refinement<br />
procedures attempt to minimize the difference between calculation <strong>and</strong> experiment,<br />
until a satisfactory fit has been obtained. The total scattering <strong>of</strong> all atoms in the unit<br />
cell is given as: 12<br />
<br />
Fhkl = ∑ exp[i2π(hxj + kyj + lzj) (3.7)<br />
where fj = scattering factor <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the N atoms. This relation may be recast in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> its amplitude, |F(hkl)|, <strong>and</strong> its phase angle, φ(hkl) or in terms <strong>of</strong> its real, A,<br />
<strong>and</strong> imaginary, B components in the following expressions: 13<br />
Fhkl = |Fhkl | exp [i2π φ(hkl)] (3.8)<br />
Fhkl = A + iB (3.9)<br />
The set <strong>of</strong> structure factors for all the reflections (hkl) are the primary quantities<br />
necessary for the derivation <strong>of</strong> the three dimensional distribution <strong>of</strong> electron density.<br />
When considering electron density the structure factor can be written as:<br />
Fhkl = (x,y,z) exp [i2π(hxn + kyn + lzn)]dV (3.10)<br />
11<br />
R. J. D. Tilley, Crystals <strong>and</strong> Crystal Structures, Wiley <strong>and</strong> Sons, New York, 114, 2006.<br />
12<br />
M. F. C. Ladd, R. A. Palmer, Structure Determination by X-ray Crystallography, Plenum Press, New York, 36,<br />
1977.<br />
13<br />
Y. Waseda, E. Matsubara, K. Shinoda, X-ray Diffraction Crystallography, Springer, Heidelberg, 109, 2011.<br />
49