31.07.2013 Views

physicochemical and functional properties of crawfish chitosan as ...

physicochemical and functional properties of crawfish chitosan as ...

physicochemical and functional properties of crawfish chitosan as ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 5<br />

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

Throughout the literature on <strong>chitosan</strong>, the main emph<strong>as</strong>is is on its quality <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>physicochemical</strong> <strong>properties</strong> which vary widely with crustacean species <strong>and</strong> preparation methods.<br />

Upon this emph<strong>as</strong>is, this research study w<strong>as</strong> attempted to prove or dispute these views by<br />

conducting similar studies <strong>and</strong> monitoring the modification <strong>of</strong> processing protocols <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>chitosan</strong> production using <strong>crawfish</strong> shell w<strong>as</strong>te, <strong>and</strong> to determine whether such modifications had<br />

any effect on the various <strong>physicochemical</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>functional</strong> <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>chitosan</strong>s. From our<br />

results, we found that specific <strong>physicochemical</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>functional</strong> <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>chitosan</strong> have<br />

affected by process protocol alteration/modification.<br />

Change/modification <strong>of</strong> decoloration (DC) step among four steps for the production <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>crawfish</strong> <strong>chitosan</strong> affected the physiochemical <strong>and</strong> <strong>functional</strong> <strong>properties</strong>. DCMPA <strong>and</strong> DMCPA<br />

resulted in an incre<strong>as</strong>e in molecular weight <strong>and</strong> <strong>as</strong>h, respectively. In contr<strong>as</strong>t, DMPCA yielded<br />

<strong>chitosan</strong> with low-viscosity. The most notable change observed with DMPAC w<strong>as</strong> a light brown<br />

degraded colored <strong>chitosan</strong> that exhibited <strong>properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> a weak polyelectrolyte. When the process<br />

<strong>of</strong> deacetylation changed its order from the st<strong>and</strong>ard method, significant degradation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>chitosan</strong> structure occurred, because the process w<strong>as</strong> a very harsh treatment with concentrated<br />

sodium hydroxide (40-50%) usually at 100 o C or higher for 30 min. Similarly, when <strong>chitosan</strong><br />

process started with Deacetylation (DA), the sudden formation <strong>of</strong> gel, an unknown white<br />

polymer with very poor yield w<strong>as</strong> obtained <strong>and</strong> the process considered unsuccessful. Thus, it is<br />

suggested not to conduct this process step for <strong>chitosan</strong> production.<br />

In a similar manner, when demineralization (DM) <strong>and</strong> deproteinization (DP) were<br />

reversed during production, the results did not show much difference except for the low<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!