31.07.2013 Views

physicochemical and functional properties of crawfish chitosan as ...

physicochemical and functional properties of crawfish chitosan as ...

physicochemical and functional properties of crawfish chitosan as ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

degradation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>chitosan</strong> structure occurs. The DD process is a very harsh treatment with<br />

concentrated sodium hydroxide (40-50%) usually at 100 o C or higher for 30 min.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, comparing DMPCA <strong>and</strong> DPMCA, the DMPCA showed viscosity <strong>of</strong><br />

131.8 cP where<strong>as</strong> 403.3 cP for DPMCA. One is almost tempted to believe that reversing<br />

demineralization (DM) <strong>and</strong> deproteinization (DP) process during the <strong>chitosan</strong> production seems<br />

to have no effect on the characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>crawfish</strong> <strong>chitosan</strong>, but the results (Table 5) otherwise<br />

showed significant differences between the two samples (DMPCA vs. DPMCA).<br />

There are some factors affecting viscosity during the production <strong>of</strong> <strong>chitosan</strong> such <strong>as</strong> the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> deacetylation, molecular weight, concentration, ionic strength, pH, <strong>and</strong> temperature,<br />

etc. Moorjani et al. (1975) reported that <strong>chitosan</strong> viscosity decre<strong>as</strong>ed with incre<strong>as</strong>ed time <strong>of</strong><br />

demineralization. The viscosity <strong>of</strong> <strong>chitosan</strong> in acetic acid tends to incre<strong>as</strong>e with decre<strong>as</strong>ing pH<br />

but decre<strong>as</strong>e with decre<strong>as</strong>ing pH in HCl. Intrinsic viscosity <strong>of</strong> <strong>chitosan</strong> is a function <strong>of</strong> the degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> ionization <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> ion strength (Bough et al., 1978). Deproteinization with 3% NaOH, <strong>and</strong><br />

elimination <strong>of</strong> the demineralization step in chitin preparation, decre<strong>as</strong>ed the viscosities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

final <strong>chitosan</strong> samples (Bough et al., 1978). Moorjani et al. (1975) stated that it is not desirable to<br />

bleach the material at any stage since bleaching considerably reduces the viscosity <strong>of</strong> the final<br />

<strong>chitosan</strong> product.<br />

4.8 Solubility<br />

All five <strong>crawfish</strong> <strong>chitosan</strong> samples <strong>and</strong> the commercial <strong>chitosan</strong>, Vanson75, demonstrated<br />

an excellent solubility ranging from 93.3 to 94.3% with no significant difference (Table 5), while<br />

the commercial <strong>chitosan</strong>, Sigma91, showed slightly lower solubility (87.8%). Brine <strong>and</strong> Austin<br />

(1981) noted that lower solubility values suggest incomplete removal <strong>of</strong> protein. Since the<br />

chemical b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong> this method is b<strong>as</strong>ed on the reaction with the amino group, the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!