physicochemical and functional properties of crawfish chitosan as ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX 22. Sigma 91 % or g/dL ηinh ηred 0.007813 7.076382 7.275656 0.015625 6.742087 7.110016 0.0234 6.85152 7.431325 0.03125 7.059056 7.898208 0.0468 6.763595 7.956538 0.0625 6.823169 8.508912 0.125 6.357467 9.70992 0.1875 6.105286 11.42202 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 92 y = 23.374x + 6.9536 R 2 = 0.9891 y = -4.9668x + 7.0327 R 2 = 0.8671 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 (6.9536 + 7.0327) / 2 = η = 6.99315 6.99315 = 1.81 X 10 -3 M 0.93 M = 7,194.21 g/mol = 7,194 Daltons
APPENDIX C. DATA OF DEGREE OF DEACETYLATION DD = 100 – [(A1655 / A3450) X 100 / 1.33]…………. (by Domszy and Roberts (1985) APPENDIX 23. DCMPA A1655 = 0.525, A3450 = 1.477, and DD = 73.3% APPENDIX 24. DMCPA A1655 = 0.679, A3450 = 1.709, and DD = 70.1% 93
Page 1 and 2:
PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND FUNCTIONAL PROP
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Page 5 and 6:
LIST OF TABLES 1. Applications of C
Page 7 and 8:
ABSTRACT Chitosan is made from chit
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Chitosan is
Page 11 and 12:
Crawfish shell as well as crustacea
Page 13 and 14:
5. Investigate the effect of deacet
Page 15 and 16:
With regards to their chemical stru
Page 17 and 18:
acetic acid. The second advantage i
Page 19 and 20:
lower viscosity chitosan obtained f
Page 21 and 22:
not deacetylated sufficiently to be
Page 23 and 24:
2.2.8 Emulsification Even though ch
Page 25 and 26:
2.2.10 Formation of Film Chitosan h
Page 27 and 28:
Fortunately, the sequence of demine
Page 29 and 30:
of the demineralization process. El
Page 31 and 32:
2.4 Factors Affecting Production of
Page 33 and 34:
(0.841-0.177 mm) had no effect on t
Page 35 and 36:
methods are those of Hackman (1954)
Page 37 and 38:
degree of deacetylation, and molecu
Page 39 and 40:
2.6.3 In Medical In the study condu
Page 41 and 42:
2) DM (Demineralization) Depending
Page 43 and 44:
analyze. The encapsulated sample wa
Page 45 and 46:
and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 1
Page 47 and 48:
with 0.03% Oil-Red-O biological sta
Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Re
Page 51 and 52: The shell was almost impossible to
Page 53 and 54: ut the values were slightly higher
Page 55 and 56: %DD values. Thus, accurate determin
Page 57 and 58: degradation of the chitosan structu
Page 59 and 60: treatment for deproteinization. In
Page 61 and 62: chitosan samples, we arbitrarily de
Page 63 and 64: Amongst the five types of oil used,
Page 65 and 66: - 0.5% chitosan solution only. Even
Page 67 and 68: showed 271 ml/g. All modified chito
Page 69 and 70: At 0.1% concentration of chitosan,
Page 71 and 72: CHAPTER 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS T
Page 73 and 74: REFERENCES Alimuniar and Zainuddin.
Page 75 and 76: pigment concentration in oil extrac
Page 77 and 78: Jeon, Y.J., Shahidi, F., and Kim, S
Page 79 and 80: Utilization of Louisiana Crawfish P
Page 81 and 82: Ogawa, S., Decker, E., McClememts D
Page 83 and 84: Smith, J.P. Simpson, B.K. and Morri
Page 85 and 86: APPENDIX A. DATA OF PHYSICOCHEMICAL
Page 87 and 88: APPENDIX 5. Degree of Deacetylation
Page 89 and 90: Bulk density (g/ml) APPENDIX 9. Bul
Page 91 and 92: WBC (%) 1200.0 1000.0 800.0 600.0 4
Page 93 and 94: APPENDIX 13. Emulsion Capacity Meas
Page 95 and 96: APPENDIX 15. Emulsion Viscosity Mea
Page 97 and 98: APPENDIX 18. DMPCA y = 33.471x + 9.
Page 99: APPENDIX 21. Vanson 75 y = 21.926x
Page 103 and 104: APPENDIX 27. DPMCA(control) A1655 =
Page 105 and 106: APPENDIX D. DATA OF AMOUNTS OF OIL
Page 107: VITA The author was born in Taegu,
show all

physicochemical and functional properties of crawfish chitosan as ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?