Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
74 Chapter 4<br />
energy saving <strong>and</strong> efficiency considerations but required fundamental<br />
<strong>change</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> configuration of <strong>the</strong> electricity system <strong>and</strong> its underlying<br />
principles. In this perspective <strong>the</strong> electricity system is conceptualised as a<br />
sociotechnical system consisting of a cluster of elements, including<br />
technology, regulation, user practices <strong>and</strong> markets, cultural meaning,<br />
infrastructure, maintenance networks, <strong>and</strong> supply networks. Figure 4.1 gives<br />
different interconnected elements for <strong>the</strong> system of electricity provision <strong>and</strong><br />
use. The elements in a sociotechnical system have become aligned, finetuned<br />
<strong>and</strong> woven <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r through processes of <strong>institutional</strong>isation.<br />
Institutionalisation refers <strong>to</strong> increasing coordination of activities through<br />
institutions of a regulative, normative <strong>and</strong> cognitive nature (Zucker, 1988;<br />
Holm, 1995; Scott, 2001).<br />
Figure 4.1 Sociotechnical system for electricity provision <strong>and</strong> use<br />
Regulations <strong>and</strong> policies<br />
(e.g. safety rules, emission<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards, energy taxes, resource<br />
policies)<br />
Fuel infrastructure<br />
(coal, oil, gas & biomass<br />
companies, pipelines)<br />
Cultural <strong>and</strong> symbolic<br />
meaning (e.g. electricity as<br />
basic need, electrification of<br />
society)<br />
Transmission infrastructure<br />
(high-low voltage networks,<br />
grid opera<strong>to</strong>rs, maintenance)<br />
Sociotechnicalsystem for<br />
electricity provision <strong>and</strong> use<br />
Artifacts (power<br />
plants, transformers,<br />
turbines)<br />
Industry structure<br />
(e.g. power producers,<br />
distribu<strong>to</strong>rs)<br />
Markets <strong>and</strong> user<br />
practices (user profiles<br />
<strong>and</strong> preferences)<br />
Knowledge infrastructure<br />
(engineering education,<br />
R&D institutes)<br />
Our analysis of <strong>change</strong>s within <strong>the</strong> electricity system in <strong>the</strong> past thirty years<br />
focuses on identifying a number of alternative routes taken, identifying <strong>the</strong><br />
nature of <strong>change</strong> in practices <strong>the</strong>se represent, identifying <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>to</strong> which<br />
<strong>the</strong>y represent <strong>change</strong>s in institutions, <strong>and</strong> aims <strong>to</strong> gain underst<strong>and</strong>ing in <strong>the</strong><br />
nature of <strong>the</strong>ir interaction with patterns of <strong>institutional</strong> <strong>change</strong>.<br />
The organisation of this chapter is as follows. First we focus on <strong>the</strong> origins<br />
of <strong>the</strong> electricity system in order <strong>to</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> system came in<strong>to</strong><br />
being <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>institutional</strong>isation through which <strong>the</strong> system became<br />
embedded in society. Secondly, we describe how different patterns of<br />
<strong>change</strong> emerged both from within <strong>and</strong> outside <strong>the</strong> regime. In a final section<br />
we draw overall conclusion based upon <strong>the</strong> analytical concepts presented in<br />
chapter three.