Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ... Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Theoretical perspectives 45 firm’s core capabilities 8 (Leonard-Barton, 1992) and from the established designs of technologies and products (Tushman and Anderson, 1986). The results are patterns of incremental innovation that introduce relatively minor changes to existing products, exploit the potential of the established design, and often reinforce the dominance of established firms (Henderson and Clark, 1990: 9). Based on Abernathy and Clark (1985: 5), Table 2.3 provides the type of innovation patterns that typically grow out of the existing system and its structures. Table 2.3 Innovation patterns growing out of the existing system Innovation aspect Innovation patterns 1) Technology/Production design/embodiment of technology improves/perfects established design production system/organisation strengthens existing structure skills (labor, managerial, technical) extends viability of existing skills material/supplier relations reinforces application of current materials, suppliers capital equipment extends existing capital knowledge and experience base builds on reinforced application of existing knowledge 2) Market/Customer relationship with customer base strengthens ties with established customers customer applications improves service in established application channels of distribution and service builds on and enhances the effectiveness of established distribution network/service organisation customer knowledge uses and extends customer knowledge and experience in established product modes of customer communication reinforces existing modes/methods of communication At the level of networks, firms are embedded in networks that co-evolve with the nesting of their products and technologies in product chains and technological systems. With regard to their innovative activities, the 8 Leonard-Barton (1992: 113) defines a core capability as the knowledge set that distinguishes and provides a competitive advantage. This knowledge set has four dimensions: skills and knowledge base, technical systems, managerial systems, and values and norms. “All four dimensions … reflect accumulated behaviours and beliefs based on early corporate successes” (p. 114).
46 Chapter 2 composition of the network and the direction of their activities will reflect the existing knowledge base and the established technology design and will foster consensus about the problems that need to be tackled and the way they should be solved. In the words of Bijker and Law (1992:10): “technologies are stabilized because the network of social relations in which they are involved – together with the various strategies that drive and give shape to the network – reach some kind of accommodation”. In the normal pattern of incremental innovation, network learning involves searching for knowledge close to previous learning activities and is mostly internal to the network, defined as local learning by Kash and Rycroft (2000: 823). “With each incremental advance, local learning tends to become more focused and more dependent upon what has done before…Time pressures reinforce the path dependence of local learning…Often these time pressures lead to local learning that reject large quantities of knowledge. In our case studies success in incremental innovation was directly related to the capacity to only use the knowledge needed to solve the immediate problem” (Rycroft and Kash, 2002: 26-27). In their analysis of six cases of complex technologies 9 Kash and Rycroft (2000, 2002) find that while patterns of incremental innovations take place in stable network along an established design, innovations of a more radical kind (either transitional other transformational in their terminology) require major modification or renewal of networks. At the sector level, increasing adoption of particular technologies or products feeds processes of standardisation to facilitate compatibility between various components (technological interrelatedness), and to facilitate the large group of users accustomed to the product (network externalities). Co-evolution of industrial organisation and established design reflects the way linkages between production, distribution, use and infrastructure are organised along the dominant design of the technological system (e.g. large central electricity producers focussing on supply factors in the era of monopolistic organisation with captive consumers and very limited customer communication and marketing). The formation of standards based on what is state of the art ‘within’ the sector can generate ‘capture’ of regulatory system and lead to barriers to innovation. At the level of society, technologies/products become embedded in every day life in the sense that routines of other actors become aligned to that of the established design. Thus, when people buy a house it is routinely expected that electricity wires and sockets run through the house and are appropriately connected to the grid. The question how electricity generation is taken care for and the possible choice for alternatives (such as generation 9 I.e. turbine blades, cardio-imaging technology, audio compact discs, radiation therapy technology, micro-floppy disks, and microprocessors.
- Page 6 and 7: Contents Preface v Chapter 1 Transi
- Page 8: Contents iii 6.4 Liberalisation of
- Page 11 and 12: vi Chapter This dissertation was fa
- Page 13 and 14: 2 Chapter 1 systems of production a
- Page 15 and 16: 4 Chapter 1 1995: 25). A basic tene
- Page 17 and 18: 6 Chapter 1 and be a member of natu
- Page 19 and 20: 8 Chapter 1 specific momentum for p
- Page 21 and 22: 10 Chapter 1 Chapter eight summaris
- Page 23 and 24: 12 Chapter 2 derive some general pr
- Page 25 and 26: 14 Chapter 2 emerges because of cha
- Page 27 and 28: 16 Chapter 2 ways things were done
- Page 29 and 30: 18 Chapter 2 multinational producer
- Page 31 and 32: 20 Chapter 2 increasing scale and r
- Page 33 and 34: 22 Chapter 2 of alternative views o
- Page 35 and 36: 24 Chapter 2 exchange of knowledge
- Page 37 and 38: 26 Chapter 2 multidirectional flux
- Page 39 and 40: 28 Chapter 2 systems are located at
- Page 41 and 42: 30 Chapter 2 - Misadaptation betwee
- Page 43 and 44: 32 Chapter 2 of these concepts and
- Page 45 and 46: 34 Chapter 2 New institutionalism i
- Page 47 and 48: 36 Chapter 2 production and consump
- Page 49 and 50: 38 Chapter 2 Figure 2.3 Model of an
- Page 51 and 52: 40 Chapter 2 traditional forms of d
- Page 53 and 54: 42 Chapter 2 2.4 Integrating insigh
- Page 55: 44 Chapter 2 2.4.1 Innovation as a
- Page 59 and 60: 48 Chapter 2 its diffusion, to crea
- Page 61 and 62: 50 Chapter 2 materials, and the pro
- Page 63 and 64: 52 Chapter 2 - specificity: as an e
- Page 65 and 66: 54 Chapter 2 often represents the p
- Page 67 and 68: 56 Chapter 2 that the introduction
- Page 69 and 70: 58 Chapter 2 2.5 Concluding remark
- Page 71 and 72: 60 Chapter 3 society. A further sec
- Page 73 and 74: 62 Chapter 3 perceptions and soluti
- Page 75 and 76: 64 Chapter 3 Linkages involve conne
- Page 77 and 78: 66 Chapter 3 Table 3.1 Typology of
- Page 79 and 80: 68 Chapter 3 185). Institutional lo
- Page 81 and 82: 70 Chapter 3 invested (Hughes, 1983
- Page 83 and 84: 72 Chapter 3 analysts of, the elect
- Page 85 and 86: 74 Chapter 4 energy saving and effi
- Page 87 and 88: 76 Chapter 4 In their analysis of t
- Page 89 and 90: 78 Chapter 4 Hughes’ basic model
- Page 91 and 92: 80 Chapter 4 improving the system a
- Page 93 and 94: 82 Chapter 4 Figure 4.3 Technology
- Page 95 and 96: 84 Chapter 4 by pollution, problems
- Page 97 and 98: 86 Chapter 4 4.5 The development of
- Page 99 and 100: 88 Chapter 4 energy sources. Safegu
- Page 101 and 102: 90 Chapter 4 - Application of nucle
- Page 103 and 104: 92 Chapter 4 - The government and t
- Page 105 and 106: 94 Chapter 4 military-industrial co
46 Chapter 2<br />
composition of <strong>the</strong> network <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong>ir activities will reflect<br />
<strong>the</strong> existing knowledge base <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> established technology design <strong>and</strong> will<br />
foster consensus about <strong>the</strong> problems that need <strong>to</strong> be tackled <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong>y<br />
should be solved. In <strong>the</strong> words of Bijker <strong>and</strong> Law (1992:10): “technologies<br />
are stabilized because <strong>the</strong> network of social relations in which <strong>the</strong>y are<br />
involved – <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> various strategies that drive <strong>and</strong> give shape <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> network – reach some kind of accommodation”. In <strong>the</strong> normal pattern of<br />
incremental innovation, network learning involves searching for knowledge<br />
close <strong>to</strong> previous learning activities <strong>and</strong> is mostly internal <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> network,<br />
defined as local learning by Kash <strong>and</strong> Rycroft (2000: 823). “With each<br />
incremental advance, local learning tends <strong>to</strong> become more focused <strong>and</strong> more<br />
dependent upon what has done before…Time pressures reinforce <strong>the</strong> path<br />
dependence of local learning…Often <strong>the</strong>se time pressures lead <strong>to</strong> local<br />
learning that reject large quantities of knowledge. In our case studies<br />
success in incremental innovation was directly related <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>to</strong> only<br />
use <strong>the</strong> knowledge needed <strong>to</strong> solve <strong>the</strong> immediate problem” (Rycroft <strong>and</strong><br />
Kash, 2002: 26-27). In <strong>the</strong>ir analysis of six cases of complex technologies 9<br />
Kash <strong>and</strong> Rycroft (2000, 2002) find that while patterns of incremental<br />
innovations take place in stable network along an established design,<br />
innovations of a more radical kind (ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>transition</strong>al o<strong>the</strong>r transformational<br />
in <strong>the</strong>ir terminology) require major modification or renewal of networks.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>to</strong>r level, increasing adoption of particular technologies or products<br />
feeds processes of st<strong>and</strong>ardisation <strong>to</strong> facilitate compatibility between various<br />
components (technological interrelatedness), <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> facilitate <strong>the</strong> large group<br />
of users accus<strong>to</strong>med <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> product (network externalities). Co-evolution of<br />
industrial organisation <strong>and</strong> established design reflects <strong>the</strong> way linkages<br />
between production, distribution, use <strong>and</strong> infrastructure are organised along<br />
<strong>the</strong> dominant design of <strong>the</strong> technological system (e.g. large central electricity<br />
producers focussing on supply fac<strong>to</strong>rs in <strong>the</strong> era of monopolistic organisation<br />
with captive consumers <strong>and</strong> very limited cus<strong>to</strong>mer communication <strong>and</strong><br />
marketing). The formation of st<strong>and</strong>ards based on what is state of <strong>the</strong> art<br />
‘within’ <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>to</strong>r can generate ‘capture’ of regula<strong>to</strong>ry system <strong>and</strong> lead <strong>to</strong><br />
barriers <strong>to</strong> innovation.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> level of society, technologies/products become embedded in every<br />
day life in <strong>the</strong> sense that routines of o<strong>the</strong>r ac<strong>to</strong>rs become aligned <strong>to</strong> that of<br />
<strong>the</strong> established design. Thus, when people buy a house it is routinely<br />
expected that electricity wires <strong>and</strong> sockets run through <strong>the</strong> house <strong>and</strong> are<br />
appropriately connected <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> grid. The question how electricity generation<br />
is taken care for <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> possible choice for alternatives (such as generation<br />
9 I.e. turbine blades, cardio-imaging technology, audio compact discs, radiation <strong>the</strong>rapy<br />
technology, micro-floppy disks, <strong>and</strong> microprocessors.