Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Theoretical perspectives 45<br />
firm’s core capabilities 8 (Leonard-Bar<strong>to</strong>n, 1992) <strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong> established<br />
designs of technologies <strong>and</strong> products (Tushman <strong>and</strong> Anderson, 1986). The<br />
results are patterns of incremental innovation that introduce relatively minor<br />
<strong>change</strong>s <strong>to</strong> existing products, exploit <strong>the</strong> potential of <strong>the</strong> established design,<br />
<strong>and</strong> often reinforce <strong>the</strong> dominance of established firms (Henderson <strong>and</strong><br />
Clark, 1990: 9). Based on Abernathy <strong>and</strong> Clark (1985: 5), Table 2.3 provides<br />
<strong>the</strong> type of innovation patterns that typically grow out of <strong>the</strong> existing system<br />
<strong>and</strong> its structures.<br />
Table 2.3 <strong>Innovation</strong> patterns growing out of <strong>the</strong> existing system<br />
<strong>Innovation</strong> aspect<br />
<strong>Innovation</strong> patterns<br />
1) Technology/Production<br />
design/embodiment of technology improves/perfects established design<br />
production system/organisation streng<strong>the</strong>ns existing structure<br />
skills (labor, managerial, technical) extends viability of existing skills<br />
material/supplier relations reinforces application of current materials,<br />
suppliers<br />
capital equipment extends existing capital<br />
knowledge <strong>and</strong> experience base builds on reinforced application of existing<br />
knowledge<br />
2) Market/Cus<strong>to</strong>mer<br />
relationship with cus<strong>to</strong>mer base streng<strong>the</strong>ns ties with established cus<strong>to</strong>mers<br />
cus<strong>to</strong>mer applications improves service in established application<br />
channels of distribution <strong>and</strong> service builds on <strong>and</strong> enhances <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of<br />
established distribution network/service<br />
organisation<br />
cus<strong>to</strong>mer knowledge uses <strong>and</strong> extends cus<strong>to</strong>mer knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />
experience in established product<br />
modes of cus<strong>to</strong>mer communication reinforces existing modes/methods of<br />
communication<br />
At <strong>the</strong> level of networks, firms are embedded in networks that co-evolve<br />
with <strong>the</strong> nesting of <strong>the</strong>ir products <strong>and</strong> technologies in product chains <strong>and</strong><br />
technological systems. With regard <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir innovative activities, <strong>the</strong><br />
8 Leonard-Bar<strong>to</strong>n (1992: 113) defines a core capability as <strong>the</strong> knowledge set that<br />
distinguishes <strong>and</strong> provides a competitive advantage. This knowledge set has four<br />
dimensions: skills <strong>and</strong> knowledge base, technical systems, managerial systems, <strong>and</strong> values<br />
<strong>and</strong> norms. “All four dimensions … reflect accumulated behaviours <strong>and</strong> beliefs based on<br />
early corporate successes” (p. 114).