31.07.2013 Views

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 Chapter 2<br />

ways things were done in <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong>y are often associated with systems<br />

<strong>change</strong>. In <strong>the</strong> innovation typology by Abernathy <strong>and</strong> Clark (1985: 5) <strong>the</strong><br />

most radical innovations are those that make existing technologies obsolete<br />

<strong>and</strong> disrupt existing market linkages, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y labelled <strong>the</strong>se architectural<br />

innovations, see <strong>the</strong> inner typology in <strong>the</strong> quadrants in Figure 2.1. This is<br />

contrasted with regular or incremental innovations that build upon existing<br />

competencies <strong>and</strong> linkages. If <strong>the</strong> nature of innovations is connected with <strong>the</strong><br />

nature of systems <strong>change</strong>, a typology such as in <strong>the</strong> outer part of <strong>the</strong><br />

quadrants in Figure 2.1 can be drawn. Although useful, this two-dimensional<br />

typology is <strong>to</strong>o limited <strong>and</strong> does not take in<strong>to</strong> account o<strong>the</strong>r relevant types of<br />

<strong>change</strong>s involved in systems <strong>change</strong>, such as in networks, institutions <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> system is embedded in society.<br />

Figure 2.1 Typology of innovation <strong>and</strong> systems <strong>change</strong> (adapted from<br />

Abernathy <strong>and</strong> Clark, 1985: 8)<br />

Builds upon existing<br />

competences / extends<br />

existing technologies<br />

System transformation<br />

New markets<br />

Regular innovation<br />

Builds upon existing market linkages<br />

/ exp<strong>and</strong>s existing cus<strong>to</strong>mer markets<br />

Disrupts existing market linkages<br />

/ creates new cus<strong>to</strong>mer markets<br />

Revolutionary innovation<br />

Niche creation Architectural innovation<br />

System innovation<br />

New sociotechnical systems<br />

Disrupts existing competences<br />

/ makes existing technologies<br />

obsolete<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> model in Figure 2.1 <strong>the</strong> development <strong>and</strong> diffusion of radical<br />

innovations fundamentally <strong>change</strong>s or replaces existing systems. To induce<br />

radical innovations <strong>the</strong> previous dominance of <strong>the</strong>ories based on a linear<br />

model of innovation led <strong>to</strong> a strong focus on science-driven <strong>and</strong> supply-push<br />

policies, as discoveries in basic science would precede inventions in applied<br />

science, <strong>and</strong> end with innovation <strong>and</strong> its diffusion (Freeman, 1996: 27). This<br />

dominance was also explained by <strong>the</strong> fact that at that time science had<br />

played an important role in <strong>the</strong> development of nuclear power while various<br />

innovations <strong>to</strong>ok place that were expected <strong>to</strong> lead <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of nuclear power

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!