Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16 Chapter 2<br />
ways things were done in <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong>y are often associated with systems<br />
<strong>change</strong>. In <strong>the</strong> innovation typology by Abernathy <strong>and</strong> Clark (1985: 5) <strong>the</strong><br />
most radical innovations are those that make existing technologies obsolete<br />
<strong>and</strong> disrupt existing market linkages, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y labelled <strong>the</strong>se architectural<br />
innovations, see <strong>the</strong> inner typology in <strong>the</strong> quadrants in Figure 2.1. This is<br />
contrasted with regular or incremental innovations that build upon existing<br />
competencies <strong>and</strong> linkages. If <strong>the</strong> nature of innovations is connected with <strong>the</strong><br />
nature of systems <strong>change</strong>, a typology such as in <strong>the</strong> outer part of <strong>the</strong><br />
quadrants in Figure 2.1 can be drawn. Although useful, this two-dimensional<br />
typology is <strong>to</strong>o limited <strong>and</strong> does not take in<strong>to</strong> account o<strong>the</strong>r relevant types of<br />
<strong>change</strong>s involved in systems <strong>change</strong>, such as in networks, institutions <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> system is embedded in society.<br />
Figure 2.1 Typology of innovation <strong>and</strong> systems <strong>change</strong> (adapted from<br />
Abernathy <strong>and</strong> Clark, 1985: 8)<br />
Builds upon existing<br />
competences / extends<br />
existing technologies<br />
System transformation<br />
New markets<br />
Regular innovation<br />
Builds upon existing market linkages<br />
/ exp<strong>and</strong>s existing cus<strong>to</strong>mer markets<br />
Disrupts existing market linkages<br />
/ creates new cus<strong>to</strong>mer markets<br />
Revolutionary innovation<br />
Niche creation Architectural innovation<br />
System innovation<br />
New sociotechnical systems<br />
Disrupts existing competences<br />
/ makes existing technologies<br />
obsolete<br />
Based on <strong>the</strong> model in Figure 2.1 <strong>the</strong> development <strong>and</strong> diffusion of radical<br />
innovations fundamentally <strong>change</strong>s or replaces existing systems. To induce<br />
radical innovations <strong>the</strong> previous dominance of <strong>the</strong>ories based on a linear<br />
model of innovation led <strong>to</strong> a strong focus on science-driven <strong>and</strong> supply-push<br />
policies, as discoveries in basic science would precede inventions in applied<br />
science, <strong>and</strong> end with innovation <strong>and</strong> its diffusion (Freeman, 1996: 27). This<br />
dominance was also explained by <strong>the</strong> fact that at that time science had<br />
played an important role in <strong>the</strong> development of nuclear power while various<br />
innovations <strong>to</strong>ok place that were expected <strong>to</strong> lead <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of nuclear power