Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ... Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Conclusions 215 The distributors initially lacked experience with small-scale physical planning and local politics, but wind capacity steadily increased as distributors gained experience and developed more appropriate (local) networks, and through the cumulative effects of subsidies, green funds and standard remuneration tariffs for wind power. The emergence of green electricity was a next milestone for the development of wind energy as domestic wind and biomass were the prime sources until liberalisation enabled large-scale imports. Acceleration of wind capacity in the past half decade was led by actors outside the electricity system as liberalisation reduced entry problems, for example through the development of beneficial rules for connection to and use of the grid. Before liberalisation took place distributors had been able to shape the conditions under which local producers could enter the grid, often resulting in relatively high barriers for those producers. Especially small private investors, independent power producers and cooperatives were able to expand their installed capacity after the liberalisation of the green electricity market in 2001. As provinces and municipalities committed more to renewable energy, capacity of wind on land grew significantly in recent years. But the largest promise is off-shore wind energy with a range of plans for wind farms of the Dutch coast, some expected to be constructed and connected to the grid by the end of 2006. High expectations regarding off-shore wind farms are shared internationally by networks involving the oil sector, off-shore sector, energy research institutes, electricity sector, power equipment producers, finance sector, governments and NGOs. International experience is growing, with off-shore wind farms in operation in Denmark and Sweden, and capacity on the North Sea expected to grow from around 600 MW in 2005 to several thousands megawatts in the coming two to three years. The Dutch government set a target for 6000 MW off-shore wind farms in 2020 and recently formulated a planning scheme for the North Sea which pointed out potentially suitable locations for off-shore wind farms. At the end of 2004 procedures for obtaining permits were formalised, leading to 78 concept initiatives by six consortia for 48 locations with a potential of 21000 MW. This large amount led the Minister of Economic Affairs in May 2005 to stop applications for the feed-in premium scheme for off-shore wind farms and biomass as it threatened to blow up the budget. Apparently, ceilings for maximum budget were not previously announced and it was not foreseen that attractive feed in premiums in combination with rising expectations of and preparations for off-shore wind farms could trigger such a potential rise in investments. What this last example indicates is the way policy measures can reinforce ongoing dynamics. Similarly, policy measures can also dampen dynamics as in the case for solar energy, where changes in policies slowed down the
216 Chapter 8 growth rates of installed PV capacity dramatically. The main motivation of the Minister of Economic Affairs is that PV is not feasible, can not contribute significantly in the short term, and has no industrial priority, arguments which significantly diverged from the position of the Ministry in 1997, when strong potential of PV was emphasised. Other countries have developed rather different cycles of expectations, approaches, and policies, such as the policy of Japan, where the aim is to produce 50% of annual investments in power through PV by 2030, where capacity topped 1000 MW in 2004 with 270 MW installed in that year, and where a range of companies, mainly from the semi-conductor and electronics sector, have become top producers of PV. The main point is to point out that expectations, approaches, and policies have a tendency to co-evolve with industrial and institutional changes. Liberalisation has introduced a short-term market orientation in the electricity sector which tends to lock-out PV. It also threatens other patterns of co-evolution for PV. New sets of linkages between the building sector, project developers and the energy sectors were created in the development and implementation of PV, leading also to the build up of alternative frames of references regarding functionalities. Also private panel owners, housing associations, and municipalities played key roles in emerging networks. Proto-institutions as pilots of promising institutional arrangements were developed and tested, with different ownership patterns for PV-panels (house-owners or energy companies) combined with different patterns of yield appropriation and control (Van Mierlo, 2002). Alternative frames of references were formed where PV is an integral part of houses, rooftops, and through its positive environmental profile, aesthetical image, and contributes to the long-term value of the house, i.e. an example of a potential transition path is unfolding. Power yields and installation costs are part of this picture but do not necessarily dominate the decision to utilise PV 1 . Yet, the decision to terminate PV subsidies and short-term promotion of PV is based on the traditional rationality of viewing and calculating PV as a means of electricity generation which is much more expensive than other forms, including competing renewable options 2 . Support for emerging institutional arrangements and cultivation of alternative frames of references will however be crucial to realise the promise of photovoltaic solar energy. 1 This emphasises the point that viewing and writing off PV as part of a 30 year investment in a house and its mortgage, gives different adoption decisions outcomes than seeing it as a short-term alternative to traditional power generation. 2 The main policy promoting PV is based on the contribution of PV to energy performance of houses, and the recent sharpened standard for new houses.
- Page 175 and 176: 164 Chapter 6 a liberalised market.
- Page 177 and 178: 166 Chapter 6 were allowed to produ
- Page 179 and 180: 168 Chapter 6 in the municipality o
- Page 181 and 182: 170 Chapter 6 became in turn one of
- Page 183 and 184: 172 Chapter 6 Table 6.1 Milestones
- Page 185 and 186: 174 Chapter 6 6.4 Liberalisation of
- Page 187 and 188: 176 Chapter 6 After the opening of
- Page 189 and 190: 178 Chapter 6 Renewable Energy Cert
- Page 191 and 192: 180 Chapter 6 2001b). The company w
- Page 193 and 194: 182 Chapter 6 infancy, energy compa
- Page 195 and 196: 184 Chapter 6 What is striking that
- Page 197 and 198: 186 Chapter 6
- Page 199 and 200: 188 Chapter 7 meaning, infrastructu
- Page 201 and 202: 190 Chapter 7 Figure 7.2 Social gro
- Page 203 and 204: 192 Chapter 7 Figure 7.3 A dynamic
- Page 205 and 206: 194 Chapter 7 7.3 Strengths and wea
- Page 207 and 208: 196 Chapter 7 Table 7.3 shows that
- Page 209 and 210: 198 Chapter 7 The process of libera
- Page 211 and 212: 200 Chapter 7 towards resource inde
- Page 213 and 214: 202 Chapter 7 improvement of cable
- Page 215 and 216: 204 Chapter 7 project. The high ene
- Page 217 and 218: 206 Chapter 7 of the promising nich
- Page 219 and 220: 208 Chapter 7
- Page 221 and 222: 210 Chapter 8 gain stability as a c
- Page 223 and 224: 212 Chapter 8 with the application
- Page 225: 214 Chapter 8 Table 8.2 Institution
- Page 229 and 230: 218 Chapter 8 This involved changes
- Page 231 and 232: 220 Chapter 8 contributes to a bett
- Page 233 and 234: 222 Chapter 8 decisions and rates o
- Page 235 and 236: 224 Chapter 8 The applicability of
- Page 237 and 238: 226 Chapter 8 8.5 Lessons for trans
- Page 239 and 240: 228 Chapter 8 ideas. Moreover, the
- Page 241 and 242: 230 Chapter 8 and decentral cogener
- Page 243 and 244: 232 Chapter 8
- Page 245 and 246: 234 References Arentsen, M.J., and
- Page 247 and 248: 236 References Bressers, H.Th.A. an
- Page 249 and 250: 238 References De Jong, J.J., E. We
- Page 251 and 252: 240 References EPRI (1999) Electric
- Page 253 and 254: 242 References Geels, F.W. (2002b)
- Page 255 and 256: 244 References Henderson, R.M. and
- Page 257 and 258: 246 References Islas, J. (1999) The
- Page 259 and 260: 248 References Dependence and Creat
- Page 261 and 262: 250 References Nelson, R.R. (1995a)
- Page 263 and 264: 252 References Quarles van Ufford,
- Page 265 and 266: 254 References Schmidheiny S. (1992
- Page 267 and 268: 256 References SNM (2000) Frisse Wi
- Page 269 and 270: 258 References Van de Ven, A.H. and
- Page 271 and 272: 260 References VROM (1993) National
- Page 273 and 274: 262 References
- Page 275 and 276: 264 Samenvatting analytisch kader d
Conclusions 215<br />
The distribu<strong>to</strong>rs initially lacked experience with small-scale physical<br />
planning <strong>and</strong> local politics, but wind capacity steadily increased as<br />
distribu<strong>to</strong>rs gained experience <strong>and</strong> developed more appropriate (local)<br />
networks, <strong>and</strong> through <strong>the</strong> cumulative effects of subsidies, green funds <strong>and</strong><br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard remuneration tariffs for wind power. The emergence of green<br />
electricity was a next miles<strong>to</strong>ne for <strong>the</strong> development of wind energy as<br />
domestic wind <strong>and</strong> biomass were <strong>the</strong> prime sources until liberalisation<br />
enabled large-scale imports. Acceleration of wind capacity in <strong>the</strong> past half<br />
decade was led by ac<strong>to</strong>rs outside <strong>the</strong> electricity system as liberalisation<br />
reduced entry problems, for example through <strong>the</strong> development of beneficial<br />
rules for connection <strong>to</strong> <strong>and</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> grid. Before liberalisation <strong>to</strong>ok place<br />
distribu<strong>to</strong>rs had been able <strong>to</strong> shape <strong>the</strong> conditions under which local<br />
producers could enter <strong>the</strong> grid, often resulting in relatively high barriers for<br />
those producers. Especially small private inves<strong>to</strong>rs, independent power<br />
producers <strong>and</strong> cooperatives were able <strong>to</strong> exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir installed capacity after<br />
<strong>the</strong> liberalisation of <strong>the</strong> green electricity market in 2001. As provinces <strong>and</strong><br />
municipalities committed more <strong>to</strong> renewable energy, capacity of wind on<br />
l<strong>and</strong> grew significantly in recent years. But <strong>the</strong> largest promise is off-shore<br />
wind energy with a range of plans for wind farms of <strong>the</strong> Dutch coast, some<br />
expected <strong>to</strong> be constructed <strong>and</strong> connected <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> grid by <strong>the</strong> end of 2006.<br />
High expectations regarding off-shore wind farms are shared internationally<br />
by networks involving <strong>the</strong> oil sec<strong>to</strong>r, off-shore sec<strong>to</strong>r, energy research<br />
institutes, electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r, power equipment producers, finance sec<strong>to</strong>r,<br />
governments <strong>and</strong> NGOs. International experience is growing, with off-shore<br />
wind farms in operation in Denmark <strong>and</strong> Sweden, <strong>and</strong> capacity on <strong>the</strong> North<br />
Sea expected <strong>to</strong> grow from around 600 MW in 2005 <strong>to</strong> several thous<strong>and</strong>s<br />
megawatts in <strong>the</strong> coming two <strong>to</strong> three years. The Dutch government set a<br />
target for 6000 MW off-shore wind farms in 2020 <strong>and</strong> recently formulated a<br />
planning scheme for <strong>the</strong> North Sea which pointed out potentially suitable<br />
locations for off-shore wind farms. At <strong>the</strong> end of 2004 procedures for<br />
obtaining permits were formalised, leading <strong>to</strong> 78 concept initiatives by six<br />
consortia for 48 locations with a potential of 21000 MW. This large amount<br />
led <strong>the</strong> Minister of Economic Affairs in May 2005 <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p applications for<br />
<strong>the</strong> feed-in premium scheme for off-shore wind farms <strong>and</strong> biomass as it<br />
threatened <strong>to</strong> blow up <strong>the</strong> budget. Apparently, ceilings for maximum budget<br />
were not previously announced <strong>and</strong> it was not foreseen that attractive feed in<br />
premiums in combination with rising expectations of <strong>and</strong> preparations for<br />
off-shore wind farms could trigger such a potential rise in investments.<br />
What this last example indicates is <strong>the</strong> way policy measures can reinforce<br />
ongoing dynamics. Similarly, policy measures can also dampen dynamics as<br />
in <strong>the</strong> case for solar energy, where <strong>change</strong>s in policies slowed down <strong>the</strong>