Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ... Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Chapter 8 Conclusions 8.1 Introduction The main purpose of this thesis is to gain understanding in the way the interaction between technological and institutional changes may offset processes towards systems change, and the way these processes may be directed towards sustainability. The preceding chapters evaluated change processes within the electricity system in the past thirty years and explored potential transition paths. This chapter presents the main conclusions. After discussing several relevant theoretical perspectives in chapter two a conceptual framework was developed in chapter three that centres around the idea that the sociotechnical system for electricity provision and use, and its institutional arrangements (modes of production, coordination, and provision), is embedded in four broader institutional arrangements that coordinate: – the way knowledge is generated, directed, distributed and used; – the way the system is regulated and legitimated in a political sense; – the way the system serves its function in the economic system; and, – the way the system provides a societal function and maintains its legitimacy. Chapter four showed that initial practices in the emerging electricity system at the end of the nineteenth century were rather divergent in terms of technological and organisational forms. A particular practice based on Edison’s central station model gained dominance as a network of actors was successful in propagating their interpretation of the electricity system and structuring the configurations of broader institutional arrangements that were emerging according to this interpretation, with the acceptance of the central station model and the principle of natural monopoly as central elements. In theoretical terms this process was characterised as institutionalisation, with gaining and maintaining legitimacy as a principal mechanism in the process. It was asserted that dominant practices organised in sociotechnical systems 209
210 Chapter 8 gain stability as a certain ‘institutional logics’, defined as a set of socially constructed assumptions, values, and beliefs, becomes prevalent. In the early electricity system the central station model and its ‘growth dynamics’ provided momentum internally and legitimacy externally. Growing electricity consumption became equated to progress, the grid became taken for granted in order to realise availability (initially), reliability (later on) and allocative efficiency (currently), and production became equated to ever larger power stations. This set-up of the system was the starting point for the analysis of a range of alternative practices and paths that were developed in the past decades. 8.2 Evaluation of alternative paths in the electricity system In chapter four the emergence – over the past decades – of a set of alternative practices was evaluated. This was done against the backdrop of the existing sociotechnical system for electricity and its established modes of production, coordination, and provision. A first aspect under evaluation was the extent to what the emerging practice diverged from these established modes. Table 8.1 provides an overview and illustrates how the two paths that diverged least from the existing institutional arrangements were most successful as they did not require alteration of the existing design of the system and its underlying principles (see 4.2: 75). Nevertheless, factors explaining their success significantly differ, as hybridisation of gas and steam turbines was driven by international developments in and experiences with gas turbines, while the shift from coal to gas was driven by the formation of a national institutional framework for natural gas exploitation and application. In fact, the discovery of the huge gas fields in the North of the Netherlands and the institutional framework for its exploitation changed the whole setting of the Dutch economic system and society, triggering not only a changeover to natural gas for power production, heating systems, and cooking, but also a shift towards energy-intensive sectors such as chemicals and horticulture. The case also illustrates a more fundamental aspect of electricity supply in the Netherlands: government impact on the nature of resource use in the electricity sector has been consistently high since the institutional framework for gas emerged. National gas policy directly influenced the power sector’s resources shift to gas, from gas to oil and back to coal after the oil crises, and again to gas as part of the industrial policy for cogeneration. The shift to gas facilitated the introduction of the gas turbine, which was first installed in industries and later in the electricity sector. Hybridisation of gas
- Page 169 and 170: 158 Chapter 5 add, not a sufficient
- Page 171 and 172: 160 Chapter 5
- Page 173 and 174: 162 Chapter 6 signify a process of
- Page 175 and 176: 164 Chapter 6 a liberalised market.
- Page 177 and 178: 166 Chapter 6 were allowed to produ
- Page 179 and 180: 168 Chapter 6 in the municipality o
- Page 181 and 182: 170 Chapter 6 became in turn one of
- Page 183 and 184: 172 Chapter 6 Table 6.1 Milestones
- Page 185 and 186: 174 Chapter 6 6.4 Liberalisation of
- Page 187 and 188: 176 Chapter 6 After the opening of
- Page 189 and 190: 178 Chapter 6 Renewable Energy Cert
- Page 191 and 192: 180 Chapter 6 2001b). The company w
- Page 193 and 194: 182 Chapter 6 infancy, energy compa
- Page 195 and 196: 184 Chapter 6 What is striking that
- Page 197 and 198: 186 Chapter 6
- Page 199 and 200: 188 Chapter 7 meaning, infrastructu
- Page 201 and 202: 190 Chapter 7 Figure 7.2 Social gro
- Page 203 and 204: 192 Chapter 7 Figure 7.3 A dynamic
- Page 205 and 206: 194 Chapter 7 7.3 Strengths and wea
- Page 207 and 208: 196 Chapter 7 Table 7.3 shows that
- Page 209 and 210: 198 Chapter 7 The process of libera
- Page 211 and 212: 200 Chapter 7 towards resource inde
- Page 213 and 214: 202 Chapter 7 improvement of cable
- Page 215 and 216: 204 Chapter 7 project. The high ene
- Page 217 and 218: 206 Chapter 7 of the promising nich
- Page 219: 208 Chapter 7
- Page 223 and 224: 212 Chapter 8 with the application
- Page 225 and 226: 214 Chapter 8 Table 8.2 Institution
- Page 227 and 228: 216 Chapter 8 growth rates of insta
- Page 229 and 230: 218 Chapter 8 This involved changes
- Page 231 and 232: 220 Chapter 8 contributes to a bett
- Page 233 and 234: 222 Chapter 8 decisions and rates o
- Page 235 and 236: 224 Chapter 8 The applicability of
- Page 237 and 238: 226 Chapter 8 8.5 Lessons for trans
- Page 239 and 240: 228 Chapter 8 ideas. Moreover, the
- Page 241 and 242: 230 Chapter 8 and decentral cogener
- Page 243 and 244: 232 Chapter 8
- Page 245 and 246: 234 References Arentsen, M.J., and
- Page 247 and 248: 236 References Bressers, H.Th.A. an
- Page 249 and 250: 238 References De Jong, J.J., E. We
- Page 251 and 252: 240 References EPRI (1999) Electric
- Page 253 and 254: 242 References Geels, F.W. (2002b)
- Page 255 and 256: 244 References Henderson, R.M. and
- Page 257 and 258: 246 References Islas, J. (1999) The
- Page 259 and 260: 248 References Dependence and Creat
- Page 261 and 262: 250 References Nelson, R.R. (1995a)
- Page 263 and 264: 252 References Quarles van Ufford,
- Page 265 and 266: 254 References Schmidheiny S. (1992
- Page 267 and 268: 256 References SNM (2000) Frisse Wi
- Page 269 and 270: 258 References Van de Ven, A.H. and
210 Chapter 8<br />
gain stability as a certain ‘<strong>institutional</strong> logics’, defined as a set of socially<br />
constructed assumptions, values, <strong>and</strong> beliefs, becomes prevalent. In <strong>the</strong> early<br />
electricity system <strong>the</strong> central station model <strong>and</strong> its ‘growth dynamics’<br />
provided momentum internally <strong>and</strong> legitimacy externally. Growing<br />
electricity consumption became equated <strong>to</strong> progress, <strong>the</strong> grid became taken<br />
for granted in order <strong>to</strong> realise availability (initially), reliability (later on) <strong>and</strong><br />
allocative efficiency (currently), <strong>and</strong> production became equated <strong>to</strong> ever<br />
larger power stations. This set-up of <strong>the</strong> system was <strong>the</strong> starting point for <strong>the</strong><br />
analysis of a range of alternative practices <strong>and</strong> paths that were developed in<br />
<strong>the</strong> past decades.<br />
8.2 Evaluation of alternative paths in <strong>the</strong> electricity<br />
system<br />
In chapter four <strong>the</strong> emergence – over <strong>the</strong> past decades – of a set of<br />
alternative practices was evaluated. This was done against <strong>the</strong> backdrop of<br />
<strong>the</strong> existing sociotechnical system for electricity <strong>and</strong> its established modes of<br />
production, coordination, <strong>and</strong> provision. A first aspect under evaluation was<br />
<strong>the</strong> extent <strong>to</strong> what <strong>the</strong> emerging practice diverged from <strong>the</strong>se established<br />
modes. Table 8.1 provides an overview <strong>and</strong> illustrates how <strong>the</strong> two paths that<br />
diverged least from <strong>the</strong> existing <strong>institutional</strong> arrangements were most<br />
successful as <strong>the</strong>y did not require alteration of <strong>the</strong> existing design of <strong>the</strong><br />
system <strong>and</strong> its underlying principles (see 4.2: 75). Never<strong>the</strong>less, fac<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
explaining <strong>the</strong>ir success significantly differ, as hybridisation of gas <strong>and</strong><br />
steam turbines was driven by international developments in <strong>and</strong> experiences<br />
with gas turbines, while <strong>the</strong> shift from coal <strong>to</strong> gas was driven by <strong>the</strong><br />
formation of a national <strong>institutional</strong> framework for natural gas exploitation<br />
<strong>and</strong> application. In fact, <strong>the</strong> discovery of <strong>the</strong> huge gas fields in <strong>the</strong> North of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>institutional</strong> framework for its exploitation <strong>change</strong>d<br />
<strong>the</strong> whole setting of <strong>the</strong> Dutch economic system <strong>and</strong> society, triggering not<br />
only a <strong>change</strong>over <strong>to</strong> natural gas for power production, heating systems, <strong>and</strong><br />
cooking, but also a shift <strong>to</strong>wards energy-intensive sec<strong>to</strong>rs such as chemicals<br />
<strong>and</strong> horticulture. The case also illustrates a more fundamental aspect of<br />
electricity supply in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s: government impact on <strong>the</strong> nature of<br />
resource use in <strong>the</strong> electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r has been consistently high since <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>institutional</strong> framework for gas emerged. National gas policy directly<br />
influenced <strong>the</strong> power sec<strong>to</strong>r’s resources shift <strong>to</strong> gas, from gas <strong>to</strong> oil <strong>and</strong> back<br />
<strong>to</strong> coal after <strong>the</strong> oil crises, <strong>and</strong> again <strong>to</strong> gas as part of <strong>the</strong> industrial policy for<br />
cogeneration.<br />
The shift <strong>to</strong> gas facilitated <strong>the</strong> introduction of <strong>the</strong> gas turbine, which was first<br />
installed in industries <strong>and</strong> later in <strong>the</strong> electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r. Hybridisation of gas