Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ... Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

doc.utwente.nl
from doc.utwente.nl More from this publisher
31.07.2013 Views

Chapter 8 Conclusions 8.1 Introduction The main purpose of this thesis is to gain understanding in the way the interaction between technological and institutional changes may offset processes towards systems change, and the way these processes may be directed towards sustainability. The preceding chapters evaluated change processes within the electricity system in the past thirty years and explored potential transition paths. This chapter presents the main conclusions. After discussing several relevant theoretical perspectives in chapter two a conceptual framework was developed in chapter three that centres around the idea that the sociotechnical system for electricity provision and use, and its institutional arrangements (modes of production, coordination, and provision), is embedded in four broader institutional arrangements that coordinate: – the way knowledge is generated, directed, distributed and used; – the way the system is regulated and legitimated in a political sense; – the way the system serves its function in the economic system; and, – the way the system provides a societal function and maintains its legitimacy. Chapter four showed that initial practices in the emerging electricity system at the end of the nineteenth century were rather divergent in terms of technological and organisational forms. A particular practice based on Edison’s central station model gained dominance as a network of actors was successful in propagating their interpretation of the electricity system and structuring the configurations of broader institutional arrangements that were emerging according to this interpretation, with the acceptance of the central station model and the principle of natural monopoly as central elements. In theoretical terms this process was characterised as institutionalisation, with gaining and maintaining legitimacy as a principal mechanism in the process. It was asserted that dominant practices organised in sociotechnical systems 209

210 Chapter 8 gain stability as a certain ‘institutional logics’, defined as a set of socially constructed assumptions, values, and beliefs, becomes prevalent. In the early electricity system the central station model and its ‘growth dynamics’ provided momentum internally and legitimacy externally. Growing electricity consumption became equated to progress, the grid became taken for granted in order to realise availability (initially), reliability (later on) and allocative efficiency (currently), and production became equated to ever larger power stations. This set-up of the system was the starting point for the analysis of a range of alternative practices and paths that were developed in the past decades. 8.2 Evaluation of alternative paths in the electricity system In chapter four the emergence – over the past decades – of a set of alternative practices was evaluated. This was done against the backdrop of the existing sociotechnical system for electricity and its established modes of production, coordination, and provision. A first aspect under evaluation was the extent to what the emerging practice diverged from these established modes. Table 8.1 provides an overview and illustrates how the two paths that diverged least from the existing institutional arrangements were most successful as they did not require alteration of the existing design of the system and its underlying principles (see 4.2: 75). Nevertheless, factors explaining their success significantly differ, as hybridisation of gas and steam turbines was driven by international developments in and experiences with gas turbines, while the shift from coal to gas was driven by the formation of a national institutional framework for natural gas exploitation and application. In fact, the discovery of the huge gas fields in the North of the Netherlands and the institutional framework for its exploitation changed the whole setting of the Dutch economic system and society, triggering not only a changeover to natural gas for power production, heating systems, and cooking, but also a shift towards energy-intensive sectors such as chemicals and horticulture. The case also illustrates a more fundamental aspect of electricity supply in the Netherlands: government impact on the nature of resource use in the electricity sector has been consistently high since the institutional framework for gas emerged. National gas policy directly influenced the power sector’s resources shift to gas, from gas to oil and back to coal after the oil crises, and again to gas as part of the industrial policy for cogeneration. The shift to gas facilitated the introduction of the gas turbine, which was first installed in industries and later in the electricity sector. Hybridisation of gas

210 Chapter 8<br />

gain stability as a certain ‘<strong>institutional</strong> logics’, defined as a set of socially<br />

constructed assumptions, values, <strong>and</strong> beliefs, becomes prevalent. In <strong>the</strong> early<br />

electricity system <strong>the</strong> central station model <strong>and</strong> its ‘growth dynamics’<br />

provided momentum internally <strong>and</strong> legitimacy externally. Growing<br />

electricity consumption became equated <strong>to</strong> progress, <strong>the</strong> grid became taken<br />

for granted in order <strong>to</strong> realise availability (initially), reliability (later on) <strong>and</strong><br />

allocative efficiency (currently), <strong>and</strong> production became equated <strong>to</strong> ever<br />

larger power stations. This set-up of <strong>the</strong> system was <strong>the</strong> starting point for <strong>the</strong><br />

analysis of a range of alternative practices <strong>and</strong> paths that were developed in<br />

<strong>the</strong> past decades.<br />

8.2 Evaluation of alternative paths in <strong>the</strong> electricity<br />

system<br />

In chapter four <strong>the</strong> emergence – over <strong>the</strong> past decades – of a set of<br />

alternative practices was evaluated. This was done against <strong>the</strong> backdrop of<br />

<strong>the</strong> existing sociotechnical system for electricity <strong>and</strong> its established modes of<br />

production, coordination, <strong>and</strong> provision. A first aspect under evaluation was<br />

<strong>the</strong> extent <strong>to</strong> what <strong>the</strong> emerging practice diverged from <strong>the</strong>se established<br />

modes. Table 8.1 provides an overview <strong>and</strong> illustrates how <strong>the</strong> two paths that<br />

diverged least from <strong>the</strong> existing <strong>institutional</strong> arrangements were most<br />

successful as <strong>the</strong>y did not require alteration of <strong>the</strong> existing design of <strong>the</strong><br />

system <strong>and</strong> its underlying principles (see 4.2: 75). Never<strong>the</strong>less, fac<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

explaining <strong>the</strong>ir success significantly differ, as hybridisation of gas <strong>and</strong><br />

steam turbines was driven by international developments in <strong>and</strong> experiences<br />

with gas turbines, while <strong>the</strong> shift from coal <strong>to</strong> gas was driven by <strong>the</strong><br />

formation of a national <strong>institutional</strong> framework for natural gas exploitation<br />

<strong>and</strong> application. In fact, <strong>the</strong> discovery of <strong>the</strong> huge gas fields in <strong>the</strong> North of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>institutional</strong> framework for its exploitation <strong>change</strong>d<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole setting of <strong>the</strong> Dutch economic system <strong>and</strong> society, triggering not<br />

only a <strong>change</strong>over <strong>to</strong> natural gas for power production, heating systems, <strong>and</strong><br />

cooking, but also a shift <strong>to</strong>wards energy-intensive sec<strong>to</strong>rs such as chemicals<br />

<strong>and</strong> horticulture. The case also illustrates a more fundamental aspect of<br />

electricity supply in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s: government impact on <strong>the</strong> nature of<br />

resource use in <strong>the</strong> electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r has been consistently high since <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>institutional</strong> framework for gas emerged. National gas policy directly<br />

influenced <strong>the</strong> power sec<strong>to</strong>r’s resources shift <strong>to</strong> gas, from gas <strong>to</strong> oil <strong>and</strong> back<br />

<strong>to</strong> coal after <strong>the</strong> oil crises, <strong>and</strong> again <strong>to</strong> gas as part of <strong>the</strong> industrial policy for<br />

cogeneration.<br />

The shift <strong>to</strong> gas facilitated <strong>the</strong> introduction of <strong>the</strong> gas turbine, which was first<br />

installed in industries <strong>and</strong> later in <strong>the</strong> electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r. Hybridisation of gas

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!