Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 8<br />
Conclusions<br />
8.1 Introduction<br />
The main purpose of this <strong>the</strong>sis is <strong>to</strong> gain underst<strong>and</strong>ing in <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong><br />
interaction between technological <strong>and</strong> <strong>institutional</strong> <strong>change</strong>s may offset<br />
processes <strong>to</strong>wards systems <strong>change</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong>se processes may be<br />
directed <strong>to</strong>wards sustainability. The preceding chapters evaluated <strong>change</strong><br />
processes within <strong>the</strong> electricity system in <strong>the</strong> past thirty years <strong>and</strong> explored<br />
potential <strong>transition</strong> paths. This chapter presents <strong>the</strong> main conclusions.<br />
After discussing several relevant <strong>the</strong>oretical perspectives in chapter two a<br />
conceptual framework was developed in chapter three that centres around<br />
<strong>the</strong> idea that <strong>the</strong> sociotechnical system for electricity provision <strong>and</strong> use, <strong>and</strong><br />
its <strong>institutional</strong> arrangements (modes of production, coordination, <strong>and</strong><br />
provision), is embedded in four broader <strong>institutional</strong> arrangements that<br />
coordinate:<br />
– <strong>the</strong> way knowledge is generated, directed, distributed <strong>and</strong> used;<br />
– <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> system is regulated <strong>and</strong> legitimated in a political sense;<br />
– <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> system serves its function in <strong>the</strong> economic system; <strong>and</strong>,<br />
– <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> system provides a societal function <strong>and</strong> maintains its<br />
legitimacy.<br />
Chapter four showed that initial practices in <strong>the</strong> emerging electricity system<br />
at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century were ra<strong>the</strong>r divergent in terms of<br />
technological <strong>and</strong> organisational forms. A particular practice based on<br />
Edison’s central station model gained dominance as a network of ac<strong>to</strong>rs was<br />
successful in propagating <strong>the</strong>ir interpretation of <strong>the</strong> electricity system <strong>and</strong><br />
structuring <strong>the</strong> configurations of broader <strong>institutional</strong> arrangements that were<br />
emerging according <strong>to</strong> this interpretation, with <strong>the</strong> acceptance of <strong>the</strong> central<br />
station model <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> principle of natural monopoly as central elements. In<br />
<strong>the</strong>oretical terms this process was characterised as <strong>institutional</strong>isation, with<br />
gaining <strong>and</strong> maintaining legitimacy as a principal mechanism in <strong>the</strong> process.<br />
It was asserted that dominant practices organised in sociotechnical systems<br />
209