31.07.2013 Views

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 8<br />

Conclusions<br />

8.1 Introduction<br />

The main purpose of this <strong>the</strong>sis is <strong>to</strong> gain underst<strong>and</strong>ing in <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong><br />

interaction between technological <strong>and</strong> <strong>institutional</strong> <strong>change</strong>s may offset<br />

processes <strong>to</strong>wards systems <strong>change</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong>se processes may be<br />

directed <strong>to</strong>wards sustainability. The preceding chapters evaluated <strong>change</strong><br />

processes within <strong>the</strong> electricity system in <strong>the</strong> past thirty years <strong>and</strong> explored<br />

potential <strong>transition</strong> paths. This chapter presents <strong>the</strong> main conclusions.<br />

After discussing several relevant <strong>the</strong>oretical perspectives in chapter two a<br />

conceptual framework was developed in chapter three that centres around<br />

<strong>the</strong> idea that <strong>the</strong> sociotechnical system for electricity provision <strong>and</strong> use, <strong>and</strong><br />

its <strong>institutional</strong> arrangements (modes of production, coordination, <strong>and</strong><br />

provision), is embedded in four broader <strong>institutional</strong> arrangements that<br />

coordinate:<br />

– <strong>the</strong> way knowledge is generated, directed, distributed <strong>and</strong> used;<br />

– <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> system is regulated <strong>and</strong> legitimated in a political sense;<br />

– <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> system serves its function in <strong>the</strong> economic system; <strong>and</strong>,<br />

– <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> system provides a societal function <strong>and</strong> maintains its<br />

legitimacy.<br />

Chapter four showed that initial practices in <strong>the</strong> emerging electricity system<br />

at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century were ra<strong>the</strong>r divergent in terms of<br />

technological <strong>and</strong> organisational forms. A particular practice based on<br />

Edison’s central station model gained dominance as a network of ac<strong>to</strong>rs was<br />

successful in propagating <strong>the</strong>ir interpretation of <strong>the</strong> electricity system <strong>and</strong><br />

structuring <strong>the</strong> configurations of broader <strong>institutional</strong> arrangements that were<br />

emerging according <strong>to</strong> this interpretation, with <strong>the</strong> acceptance of <strong>the</strong> central<br />

station model <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> principle of natural monopoly as central elements. In<br />

<strong>the</strong>oretical terms this process was characterised as <strong>institutional</strong>isation, with<br />

gaining <strong>and</strong> maintaining legitimacy as a principal mechanism in <strong>the</strong> process.<br />

It was asserted that dominant practices organised in sociotechnical systems<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!