31.07.2013 Views

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Exploring <strong>transition</strong>s through sociotechnical scenarios 207<br />

The primary aim of this chapter is <strong>to</strong> show <strong>the</strong> promise of sociotechnical<br />

scenarios as a reflexive <strong>to</strong>ol for <strong>transition</strong> policy. Sociotechnical scenarios<br />

can help design more robust <strong>transition</strong> oriented policies, in <strong>the</strong> sense that<br />

<strong>the</strong>se policies can contribute <strong>to</strong> multiple <strong>transition</strong> paths <strong>and</strong> do not facilitate<br />

one path while blocking o<strong>the</strong>rs. The approach can also help select promising<br />

niches that can form <strong>the</strong> seeds for a <strong>transition</strong> <strong>and</strong> thus are good options for<br />

experimentation in <strong>the</strong> near term. In particular <strong>the</strong> STSc <strong>to</strong>ol is well-suited <strong>to</strong><br />

explore how combinations of niches may open up different pathways.<br />

Transition policy should not just look at individual technologies, but also at<br />

processes of hybridisation <strong>and</strong> linkages between technologies <strong>and</strong> specific<br />

user preferences.<br />

The STSc <strong>to</strong>ol is not an au<strong>to</strong>ma<strong>to</strong>n that provides a detailed prescription of<br />

instruments. We characterize STSc as a ‘<strong>to</strong>ol’ ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a ‘method’. The<br />

use of a <strong>to</strong>ol requires skills on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> user, while a method refers <strong>to</strong> a<br />

sequence of steps that au<strong>to</strong>matically lead <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> end result. STSc is a <strong>to</strong>ol,<br />

because it requires at least two kinds of skills: empirical knowledge of <strong>the</strong><br />

relevant domain <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical sensitivity regarding <strong>the</strong> co-evolution of<br />

technology <strong>and</strong> society. Maybe this hampers <strong>the</strong> transfer of <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>ol <strong>to</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs. But mindful use of <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>ol may also lead <strong>to</strong> more interesting<br />

outcomes.<br />

As a weakness, <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>ol in its present shape is that it is not well suited <strong>to</strong><br />

compute <strong>the</strong> effects of (combinations of) policy instruments. For instance, it<br />

does not render suggestions for <strong>the</strong> exact level of eco-tax, adoption subsidies<br />

etc. O<strong>the</strong>r methods may be better suited for that (e.g. computer models). This<br />

means that sociotechnical scenarios do not replace o<strong>the</strong>r methods, but<br />

provide an additional <strong>to</strong>ol <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> arsenal of future exploration.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!