31.07.2013 Views

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

188 Chapter 7<br />

meaning, infrastructure, maintenance networks, <strong>and</strong> supply networks.<br />

Sociotechnical systems are stable, because <strong>the</strong> elements are aligned <strong>and</strong><br />

woven <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r. Yet, <strong>to</strong> solve structural problems in society, we need<br />

<strong>transition</strong>s in sociotechnical systems. Such system innovations not only<br />

involve technological <strong>change</strong>s, but also <strong>change</strong>s in user practices, policy <strong>and</strong><br />

regulation, infrastructure, social networks, <strong>and</strong> culture.<br />

Policy makers, NGOs, large firms <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs show substantial interest in<br />

system innovations. The S<strong>to</strong>ckholm Environment Institute, for instance,<br />

published a book on <strong>the</strong> Great Transition (Raskin et al. 2002). The American<br />

National Research Council (1999) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dutch Research Council NWO<br />

have made <strong>transition</strong>s part of <strong>the</strong>ir research portfolio. And <strong>the</strong> Dutch<br />

government gave <strong>transition</strong>s a central place in <strong>the</strong>ir fourth National<br />

Environmental Policy Plan (VROM, 2001). They think that system<br />

innovations promise large improvements in environmental efficiency as<br />

shown in Figure 7.1.<br />

Figure 7.1 System optimisation versus system innovation (Weterings et al.,<br />

1997)<br />

Improvement in<br />

environmental efficiency<br />

Fac<strong>to</strong>r 10<br />

Fac<strong>to</strong>r 5<br />

Fac<strong>to</strong>r 2<br />

5 10 20<br />

Function innovation<br />

= new system<br />

Partial system redesign<br />

System optimimisation<br />

Time horizon (years)<br />

But <strong>transition</strong>s are complex, uncertain <strong>and</strong> involve multiple social groups.<br />

Hence, decision makers struggle with <strong>the</strong> question on how <strong>to</strong> know <strong>and</strong><br />

influence possible directions of such <strong>transition</strong>s. Scenarios or forecasting<br />

exercises are often used <strong>to</strong> guide such strategic decision-making. The central<br />

argument developed in section 7.3 is that existing scenario methods are not<br />

entirely suited <strong>to</strong> explore system innovation. They are often based on <strong>to</strong>o<br />

simple assumptions about <strong>the</strong> dynamics of technological <strong>change</strong>, <strong>and</strong> ignore

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!