Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
188 Chapter 7<br />
meaning, infrastructure, maintenance networks, <strong>and</strong> supply networks.<br />
Sociotechnical systems are stable, because <strong>the</strong> elements are aligned <strong>and</strong><br />
woven <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r. Yet, <strong>to</strong> solve structural problems in society, we need<br />
<strong>transition</strong>s in sociotechnical systems. Such system innovations not only<br />
involve technological <strong>change</strong>s, but also <strong>change</strong>s in user practices, policy <strong>and</strong><br />
regulation, infrastructure, social networks, <strong>and</strong> culture.<br />
Policy makers, NGOs, large firms <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs show substantial interest in<br />
system innovations. The S<strong>to</strong>ckholm Environment Institute, for instance,<br />
published a book on <strong>the</strong> Great Transition (Raskin et al. 2002). The American<br />
National Research Council (1999) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dutch Research Council NWO<br />
have made <strong>transition</strong>s part of <strong>the</strong>ir research portfolio. And <strong>the</strong> Dutch<br />
government gave <strong>transition</strong>s a central place in <strong>the</strong>ir fourth National<br />
Environmental Policy Plan (VROM, 2001). They think that system<br />
innovations promise large improvements in environmental efficiency as<br />
shown in Figure 7.1.<br />
Figure 7.1 System optimisation versus system innovation (Weterings et al.,<br />
1997)<br />
Improvement in<br />
environmental efficiency<br />
Fac<strong>to</strong>r 10<br />
Fac<strong>to</strong>r 5<br />
Fac<strong>to</strong>r 2<br />
5 10 20<br />
Function innovation<br />
= new system<br />
Partial system redesign<br />
System optimimisation<br />
Time horizon (years)<br />
But <strong>transition</strong>s are complex, uncertain <strong>and</strong> involve multiple social groups.<br />
Hence, decision makers struggle with <strong>the</strong> question on how <strong>to</strong> know <strong>and</strong><br />
influence possible directions of such <strong>transition</strong>s. Scenarios or forecasting<br />
exercises are often used <strong>to</strong> guide such strategic decision-making. The central<br />
argument developed in section 7.3 is that existing scenario methods are not<br />
entirely suited <strong>to</strong> explore system innovation. They are often based on <strong>to</strong>o<br />
simple assumptions about <strong>the</strong> dynamics of technological <strong>change</strong>, <strong>and</strong> ignore