Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 Chapter 1<br />
1995: 25). A basic tenet of ecological modernisation is “that <strong>the</strong> capitalist<br />
political economy needs conscious reconfiguring <strong>and</strong> far-sighted action so<br />
that economic development <strong>and</strong> environmental protection can proceed h<strong>and</strong>in-h<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> reinforce one ano<strong>the</strong>r” (Dryzek, 1997: 143). Ecological<br />
modernisation <strong>the</strong>ory advances <strong>the</strong> idea that collaboration of key ac<strong>to</strong>rs such<br />
as government, industry, reform-oriented environmentalists, <strong>and</strong> science, can<br />
generate win-win outcomes of economic development <strong>and</strong> environmental<br />
improvement 6 . These paradigms suggest that sustainability is possible via<br />
more sensible <strong>and</strong> innovative uses of resources through a process of<br />
continuous, incremental improvement.<br />
O<strong>the</strong>rs point out that higher efficiency will not be enough. It may slow down<br />
<strong>the</strong> rates of contamination <strong>and</strong> depletion, but does not s<strong>to</strong>p <strong>the</strong>se processes<br />
(McDonough <strong>and</strong> Braungart, 1998). Moreover, eco-efficiency does not pay<br />
attention <strong>to</strong> social dimensions of sustainability (for instance inter- <strong>and</strong> intragenerational<br />
equity). This leads <strong>to</strong> a plea for more structural <strong>change</strong>s. The<br />
second perspective <strong>the</strong>refore can be called ‘systems <strong>change</strong>’. Several<br />
approaches can be identified with different accents on how this <strong>change</strong><br />
process may come about <strong>and</strong> who will be <strong>the</strong> main ac<strong>to</strong>rs driving <strong>the</strong><br />
process.<br />
The engineering approach <strong>to</strong> systems <strong>change</strong> stresses fundamental <strong>change</strong>s<br />
in design parameters, principles <strong>and</strong> requirements that are necessary.<br />
McDonough <strong>and</strong> Braungart (1998, 2002) argue for a ‘next industrial<br />
revolution’, a completely different way of designing industrial production 7 .<br />
Instead of becoming more efficient <strong>the</strong>y argue for new design principles that<br />
eliminate dangerous emissions al<strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> adopt concepts such as ‘waste<br />
equals food’ <strong>and</strong> ‘cradle-<strong>to</strong>-cradle’. An example is <strong>the</strong> elimination of 7,962<br />
chemicals used in <strong>the</strong> textile industry for carpet production on a <strong>to</strong>tal of<br />
8,000. The fabric was <strong>to</strong> decompose naturally <strong>and</strong> effluents of <strong>the</strong><br />
manufacturing process were as clean as <strong>the</strong> influents 8 (McDonough <strong>and</strong><br />
Braungart, 1998). Parts of products composed of materials that do not<br />
biodegrade should be kept at a minimum <strong>and</strong> be designed as technical<br />
nutrients that circulate within closed-loop industrial cycles (‘cradle-<strong>to</strong>cradle’).<br />
Related ideas are those of biomimicry (Benyus, 1997), natural<br />
6 Note however that scholars such as Spaargaren (2000) <strong>and</strong> Huber (2000) reject reducing<br />
ecological modernisation <strong>to</strong> a simple efficiency approach, <strong>and</strong> explore how more structural<br />
<strong>change</strong>s may come about.<br />
7 The next industrial revolution will in <strong>the</strong>ir perspective built on three basic concerns:<br />
equity, economy <strong>and</strong> ecology which <strong>the</strong>y have developed in<strong>to</strong> a design <strong>to</strong>ol called <strong>the</strong><br />
Triple Top Line (McDonough <strong>and</strong> Braungart, 2002).<br />
8 The carpet was not sold as a product but provided cus<strong>to</strong>mers with <strong>the</strong> service of <strong>the</strong> carpet<br />
while still owning <strong>the</strong> material (Presentation at GIN Conference, Chapel Hill, USA, 1999,<br />
<strong>and</strong> McDonough <strong>and</strong> Braungart, 1998).