31.07.2013 Views

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evolution of decentral cogeneration in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s 135<br />

where <strong>to</strong> construct new <strong>and</strong> larger power plants based on relatively cheap<br />

gas 8 with higher efficiency that enabled stable electricity prices, energy<br />

companies were forced <strong>to</strong> think about improving efficiency <strong>and</strong> energy<br />

saving under volatile price conditions <strong>and</strong> slowing dem<strong>and</strong>. Securing energy<br />

supply through resource diversification <strong>and</strong> reducing energy consumption<br />

through energy saving were <strong>the</strong> pillars under <strong>the</strong> <strong>change</strong>d energy policy in<br />

<strong>the</strong> first energy paper, which in fact was <strong>the</strong> first government attempt <strong>to</strong><br />

develop a more comprehensive energy policy (TK, 1974). Initially, decentral<br />

cogeneration was not on <strong>the</strong> agendas of electricity companies <strong>and</strong><br />

government but <strong>the</strong> focus was foremost on central cogeneration with district<br />

heating 9 . This <strong>change</strong>d when <strong>the</strong> energy council, founded in response <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

first energy crisis, pointed out <strong>the</strong> potential of industrial cogeneration for<br />

energy saving <strong>and</strong> proposed a range of measures <strong>to</strong> realise this potential 10<br />

(AER, 1978). The council had heterogeneous membership with<br />

representatives from industry, civil society, science <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

<strong>and</strong> was less biased <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing configuration dominated by monopolistic<br />

behaviour of electricity companies. A specific committee on industrial<br />

cogeneration was formed by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Economic Affairs <strong>to</strong> assess<br />

impediments for industrial cogeneration more in detail <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> develop<br />

recommendations <strong>to</strong> overcome <strong>the</strong>se obstacles (EZ, 1980).<br />

Mobilisation of ac<strong>to</strong>rs for alternative routes<br />

The second oil crisis accelerated policy <strong>change</strong> in favour of decentral<br />

cogeneration due <strong>to</strong> skyrocketing energy prices. Energy saving was central<br />

<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> second white paper on energy policy <strong>and</strong> significant contributions<br />

were planned by central cogeneration through district heating, <strong>and</strong> by<br />

decentral industrial cogeneration (TK, 1979). Policy <strong>change</strong> both involved<br />

8 After discovery of <strong>the</strong> large Slochteren gas field in 1959 in <strong>the</strong> North of <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

gas was offered at relatively advantageous prices. This policy <strong>change</strong>d <strong>to</strong> a prudent use of<br />

gas after <strong>the</strong> oil crisis. In <strong>the</strong> first energy paper of 1974 also a link of <strong>the</strong> gas price <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

oil price was announced, <strong>and</strong> no new gas contracts for electricity generation were settled,<br />

except for highly efficient plants, such as combined cycles of gas <strong>and</strong> steam turbines<br />

(CCGT) (TK, 1974; Bläsing, 1992; Vlijm, 2002). For example, in 1976 <strong>the</strong> Donge CCGT<br />

power plant was brought in<strong>to</strong> use with an efficiency of 44% (Bläsing, 1992: 331). Steam<br />

turbines reached efficiencies of 35 <strong>to</strong> 40% (VDEN, 1980; SEP, 1994; Hofman <strong>and</strong><br />

Marquart, 2001).<br />

9 A committee was set-up in 1975 <strong>to</strong> investigate <strong>the</strong> potential of district heating. Although<br />

<strong>the</strong> SEP was initially sceptical regarding <strong>the</strong> economics of district heating, in light of<br />

energy saving targets, government pressure, <strong>and</strong> growing insights regarding <strong>the</strong> potential,<br />

from 1977 on 16 large scale district heating projects were initiated. The focus on larger<br />

scale was expected <strong>to</strong> improve <strong>the</strong> cost picture.<br />

10 Relevant <strong>to</strong> note is that two decades earlier <strong>the</strong> high efficiency of decentral cogeneration<br />

relative <strong>to</strong> central generation was already reported but largely ignored by <strong>the</strong> electricity<br />

sec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>and</strong> government (Buiter <strong>and</strong> Hesselmans, 1999; Verbong et al., 2001).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!