Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Evolution of decentral cogeneration in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s 135<br />
where <strong>to</strong> construct new <strong>and</strong> larger power plants based on relatively cheap<br />
gas 8 with higher efficiency that enabled stable electricity prices, energy<br />
companies were forced <strong>to</strong> think about improving efficiency <strong>and</strong> energy<br />
saving under volatile price conditions <strong>and</strong> slowing dem<strong>and</strong>. Securing energy<br />
supply through resource diversification <strong>and</strong> reducing energy consumption<br />
through energy saving were <strong>the</strong> pillars under <strong>the</strong> <strong>change</strong>d energy policy in<br />
<strong>the</strong> first energy paper, which in fact was <strong>the</strong> first government attempt <strong>to</strong><br />
develop a more comprehensive energy policy (TK, 1974). Initially, decentral<br />
cogeneration was not on <strong>the</strong> agendas of electricity companies <strong>and</strong><br />
government but <strong>the</strong> focus was foremost on central cogeneration with district<br />
heating 9 . This <strong>change</strong>d when <strong>the</strong> energy council, founded in response <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
first energy crisis, pointed out <strong>the</strong> potential of industrial cogeneration for<br />
energy saving <strong>and</strong> proposed a range of measures <strong>to</strong> realise this potential 10<br />
(AER, 1978). The council had heterogeneous membership with<br />
representatives from industry, civil society, science <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r<br />
<strong>and</strong> was less biased <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing configuration dominated by monopolistic<br />
behaviour of electricity companies. A specific committee on industrial<br />
cogeneration was formed by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Economic Affairs <strong>to</strong> assess<br />
impediments for industrial cogeneration more in detail <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> develop<br />
recommendations <strong>to</strong> overcome <strong>the</strong>se obstacles (EZ, 1980).<br />
Mobilisation of ac<strong>to</strong>rs for alternative routes<br />
The second oil crisis accelerated policy <strong>change</strong> in favour of decentral<br />
cogeneration due <strong>to</strong> skyrocketing energy prices. Energy saving was central<br />
<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> second white paper on energy policy <strong>and</strong> significant contributions<br />
were planned by central cogeneration through district heating, <strong>and</strong> by<br />
decentral industrial cogeneration (TK, 1979). Policy <strong>change</strong> both involved<br />
8 After discovery of <strong>the</strong> large Slochteren gas field in 1959 in <strong>the</strong> North of <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s<br />
gas was offered at relatively advantageous prices. This policy <strong>change</strong>d <strong>to</strong> a prudent use of<br />
gas after <strong>the</strong> oil crisis. In <strong>the</strong> first energy paper of 1974 also a link of <strong>the</strong> gas price <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
oil price was announced, <strong>and</strong> no new gas contracts for electricity generation were settled,<br />
except for highly efficient plants, such as combined cycles of gas <strong>and</strong> steam turbines<br />
(CCGT) (TK, 1974; Bläsing, 1992; Vlijm, 2002). For example, in 1976 <strong>the</strong> Donge CCGT<br />
power plant was brought in<strong>to</strong> use with an efficiency of 44% (Bläsing, 1992: 331). Steam<br />
turbines reached efficiencies of 35 <strong>to</strong> 40% (VDEN, 1980; SEP, 1994; Hofman <strong>and</strong><br />
Marquart, 2001).<br />
9 A committee was set-up in 1975 <strong>to</strong> investigate <strong>the</strong> potential of district heating. Although<br />
<strong>the</strong> SEP was initially sceptical regarding <strong>the</strong> economics of district heating, in light of<br />
energy saving targets, government pressure, <strong>and</strong> growing insights regarding <strong>the</strong> potential,<br />
from 1977 on 16 large scale district heating projects were initiated. The focus on larger<br />
scale was expected <strong>to</strong> improve <strong>the</strong> cost picture.<br />
10 Relevant <strong>to</strong> note is that two decades earlier <strong>the</strong> high efficiency of decentral cogeneration<br />
relative <strong>to</strong> central generation was already reported but largely ignored by <strong>the</strong> electricity<br />
sec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>and</strong> government (Buiter <strong>and</strong> Hesselmans, 1999; Verbong et al., 2001).