31.07.2013 Views

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

130 Chapter 5<br />

Figure 5.3: Share of decentral cogeneration in domestic electricity<br />

production (EnergieNed)<br />

(%)<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003<br />

The increasing diversity of types of technologies used can be explained by a<br />

similar increasing diversity in <strong>the</strong> application of cogeneration in different<br />

sec<strong>to</strong>rs, such as horticulture, health care organisations, service organisations,<br />

wastewater treatment plants, swimming pools, hotels, <strong>and</strong> so forth. Changes<br />

in <strong>the</strong> nature of investments can also be observed. His<strong>to</strong>rically investments<br />

in decentral cogeneration <strong>to</strong>ok place in various industries 2 as a means <strong>to</strong><br />

produce electricity <strong>and</strong> heat for own use. From <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> eighties on a<br />

new ac<strong>to</strong>r becomes a major inves<strong>to</strong>r in decentral cogeneration: <strong>the</strong> energy<br />

distribution sec<strong>to</strong>r. The amount of cogeneration capacity under control of<br />

energy distribu<strong>to</strong>rs increased from 70 MW in 1990 <strong>to</strong> 950 MW in 1996<br />

(Elzenga et al., 2001). Moreover, energy distribu<strong>to</strong>rs started <strong>to</strong> invest in<br />

cogeneration through joint ventures with industry. Joint-ventures <strong>to</strong>ok a<br />

share of 28% in decentral (co)generation in 1995, <strong>and</strong> this share exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>to</strong><br />

48% in 2000 <strong>and</strong> 47% in 2003 3 . A fur<strong>the</strong>r pattern of <strong>change</strong> is a development<br />

<strong>to</strong>wards cogeneration installations producing a larger share of electricity for<br />

<strong>the</strong> grid relative <strong>to</strong> own use. Early installations, before 1985, were more<br />

dimensioned based on own electricity dem<strong>and</strong> because of relatively low<br />

remuneration tariffs (Battjes <strong>and</strong> Rijkers, 2000). As <strong>the</strong> climate for<br />

cogeneration improved, for example through subsidies <strong>and</strong> higher<br />

2 Mainly process industries with a continuous dem<strong>and</strong> for steam such as <strong>the</strong> chemical<br />

industry, paper industry, food industry <strong>and</strong> petrochemical industry (SEP, 1979; Blok,<br />

1993).<br />

3 Source: Central Bureau of Statistics, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s, Decentrale elektriciteitsproductie<br />

naar sec<strong>to</strong>r, in: CBS, Energie <strong>and</strong> Water.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!