Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 5<br />
Evolution of decentral cogeneration in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s<br />
5.1 Introduction<br />
This chapter focuses on <strong>the</strong> development of decentral combined heat <strong>and</strong><br />
power production, in short: decentral cogeneration, in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s. The<br />
development of Dutch cogeneration is remarkable because of <strong>the</strong> high<br />
penetration within <strong>the</strong> Dutch electricity system, <strong>and</strong> because of <strong>the</strong> rapid<br />
uptake of decentral cogeneration from <strong>the</strong> mid eighties <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong><br />
nineties. From a comparative perspective it is salient because <strong>the</strong> share of<br />
decentral cogeneration of around 40% is high relative <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU average of<br />
around 10%. In countries such as Germany, <strong>the</strong> UK, Belgium <strong>and</strong> France <strong>the</strong><br />
share of cogeneration is lower than 10%, while cogeneration in Denmark<br />
<strong>and</strong> Finl<strong>and</strong> has a share in electricity generation comparable <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s. The main relevance of decentral cogeneration for this <strong>the</strong>sis lies<br />
in its character: it represents a fundamentally different way of electricity<br />
generation, both in <strong>the</strong> way it is perceived <strong>to</strong> fulfil <strong>the</strong> function of energy<br />
provision as in <strong>the</strong> way this function is organised. Decentral cogeneration<br />
implies a different ac<strong>to</strong>r constellation with different roles for ac<strong>to</strong>rs as<br />
compared <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> central station electricity system 1 , such as for example <strong>the</strong><br />
stronger user orientation due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> importance of heat dem<strong>and</strong> within <strong>the</strong><br />
cogeneration package. It dem<strong>and</strong>s different types of knowledge because <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>to</strong>pology of <strong>the</strong> network <strong>change</strong>s as electricity flows become more<br />
heterogeneous <strong>and</strong> as heat dem<strong>and</strong> determines <strong>the</strong> location of power plants.<br />
Different planning procedures <strong>and</strong> regulations are required as more entry<br />
points <strong>and</strong> units for electricity generation emerge within <strong>the</strong> system <strong>and</strong> its<br />
network infrastructure, with more heterogeneity in supply profiles. Decentral<br />
cogeneration is mainly dimensioned along local dem<strong>and</strong> for heat, which<br />
implies that its optimal scale is dependent upon, <strong>and</strong> varies according <strong>to</strong>, <strong>the</strong><br />
heat dem<strong>and</strong> profile of <strong>the</strong> user(s). In short, it requires a different<br />
1<br />
The central station electricity system involves generation of electricity in a power plant<br />
<strong>and</strong> transport <strong>and</strong> distribution through a power network <strong>to</strong> a variety of users.<br />
127