Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ... Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...
Stability and transformation in the electricity system 117 The main point is to point out that expectations, approaches, and policies have a tendency to co-evolve with industrial and institutional changes. Liberalisation has introduced a short-term market orientation both in the electricity sector and in government circles which tends to lock-out PV. However, PV development was rather strongly connected to diverse networks where private panel owners, housing associations, building project developers, and municipalities played central roles next to energy providers. PV is therefore also taken up increasingly in the realm of building, whereas its policy support is dominantly related to energy development. This is an example of the way broader institutionalisation impacts the choices and strategies regarding technologies such as PV that will provide different functions than traditional energy technologies. 4.12 Biomass 43 emerges as the dominant sustainable variety Biomass can be applied in various ways as a source for electricity generation. Four dominant principles exist in the route from biomass to electricity, Figure 4.5 gives an overview. Combustion is the principle dominantly used because it applies the same technologies as in conventional electricity generation. For three other routes, gasification, pyrolysis and fermentation/digestion, biomass is first converted to gas or oil before it is fitted into electricity production with steam turbines and/or gas turbines. These routes are generally considered to have larger potential in the long term because they can provide more efficient and cleaner electricity, but also because bio-fuel is a potential fuel source for the transport sector. 43 Here we use the term biomass to indicate renewable sources based on organic material (short-term carbon-neutral cycle). In this section we also characterise waste as biomass. The non-fossil part of waste is considered as renewable biomass, and the fossil part, such as plastics, is considered non-renewable. Although EU policy initially suggested that waste incineration did not fall under biomass, after intensive lobbying of especially the Dutch, it has accepted the organic fraction of waste as renewable energy.
118 Chapter 4 Figure 4.5 Conversion of biomass into electricity (Faaij, 1997) Biomass Gasification (co-)combustion Steam turbine Electricity Pyrolysis Fermentation Gas turbine/ engine/ fuel cell Until the middle of the eighties the use of biomass for electricity generation was limited. In the late 1980s, the use of biomass as a source for electricity production increased when the first national environmental policy plan introduced a new sequence of waste treatment options, preferring waste incineration to disposal. Waste disposal became increasingly questioned because of lack of space and soil pollution in the Netherlands. Also the use of waste incineration for heat and/or electricity production was formulated as a policy objective (VROM, 1989: 223). Consequently, waste incineration expanded and increasingly electricity generation was added as an additional activity. Next to incineration also the use of landfill gas for electricity generation increased. From 1995 on, electricity production by waste incineration significantly increased (see also Table 4.7), due to increasing restrictions on waste disposal and the introduction of regulatory measures for incineration plants that forced existing installations to reduce emissions and increase efficiency, thus also increasing electricity production. Waste incineration was until the end of the nineties the main renewable source for electricity generation but remained at a stable level while other biomass options were expanding, particularly co-combustion of biomass in coal-fired power plants. In 2003 around a quarter of Dutch renewable energy is based upon waste incineration (CBS, 2004: 25).
- Page 77 and 78: 66 Chapter 3 Table 3.1 Typology of
- Page 79 and 80: 68 Chapter 3 185). Institutional lo
- Page 81 and 82: 70 Chapter 3 invested (Hughes, 1983
- Page 83 and 84: 72 Chapter 3 analysts of, the elect
- Page 85 and 86: 74 Chapter 4 energy saving and effi
- Page 87 and 88: 76 Chapter 4 In their analysis of t
- Page 89 and 90: 78 Chapter 4 Hughes’ basic model
- Page 91 and 92: 80 Chapter 4 improving the system a
- Page 93 and 94: 82 Chapter 4 Figure 4.3 Technology
- Page 95 and 96: 84 Chapter 4 by pollution, problems
- Page 97 and 98: 86 Chapter 4 4.5 The development of
- Page 99 and 100: 88 Chapter 4 energy sources. Safegu
- Page 101 and 102: 90 Chapter 4 - Application of nucle
- Page 103 and 104: 92 Chapter 4 - The government and t
- Page 105 and 106: 94 Chapter 4 military-industrial co
- Page 107 and 108: 96 Chapter 4 hardware” (Hirsh, 19
- Page 109 and 110: 98 Chapter 4 In conclusion, the int
- Page 111 and 112: 100 Chapter 4 government 25 . Never
- Page 113 and 114: 102 Chapter 4 - Both economic incen
- Page 115 and 116: 104 Chapter 4 organisation of the e
- Page 117 and 118: 106 Chapter 4 industry could delive
- Page 119 and 120: 108 Chapter 4 More robust plans for
- Page 121 and 122: 110 Chapter 4 Table 4.4 Evolution o
- Page 123 and 124: 112 Chapter 4 4.11 The development
- Page 125 and 126: 114 Chapter 4 Table 4.6 Evolution o
- Page 127: 116 Chapter 4 Parties involved are
- Page 131 and 132: 120 Chapter 4 combustion of biomass
- Page 133 and 134: 122 Chapter 4 The focus on biomass
- Page 135 and 136: 124 Chapter 4 Let us consider other
- Page 137 and 138: 126 Chapter 4 varying processes of
- Page 139 and 140: 128 Chapter 5 technological and ins
- Page 141 and 142: 130 Chapter 5 Figure 5.3: Share of
- Page 143 and 144: 132 Chapter 5 and search routines i
- Page 145 and 146: 134 Chapter 5 solutions is main con
- Page 147 and 148: 136 Chapter 5 and was triggered by
- Page 149 and 150: 138 Chapter 5 signalling significan
- Page 151 and 152: 140 Chapter 5 Table 5.2 Main change
- Page 153 and 154: 142 Chapter 5 1982; Blok, 1991; Bui
- Page 155 and 156: 144 Chapter 5 10-12). The third iss
- Page 157 and 158: 146 Chapter 5 replaced the focus on
- Page 159 and 160: 148 Chapter 5 from 220 MWe in 1990
- Page 161 and 162: 150 Chapter 5 and supply. Only afte
- Page 163 and 164: 152 Chapter 5 provides an overview
- Page 165 and 166: 154 Chapter 5 Prospects for cogener
- Page 167 and 168: 156 Chapter 5 the existing system a
- Page 169 and 170: 158 Chapter 5 add, not a sufficient
- Page 171 and 172: 160 Chapter 5
- Page 173 and 174: 162 Chapter 6 signify a process of
- Page 175 and 176: 164 Chapter 6 a liberalised market.
- Page 177 and 178: 166 Chapter 6 were allowed to produ
Stability <strong>and</strong> transformation in <strong>the</strong> electricity system 117<br />
The main point is <strong>to</strong> point out that expectations, approaches, <strong>and</strong> policies<br />
have a tendency <strong>to</strong> co-evolve with industrial <strong>and</strong> <strong>institutional</strong> <strong>change</strong>s.<br />
Liberalisation has introduced a short-term market orientation both in <strong>the</strong><br />
electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>and</strong> in government circles which tends <strong>to</strong> lock-out PV.<br />
However, PV development was ra<strong>the</strong>r strongly connected <strong>to</strong> diverse<br />
networks where private panel owners, housing associations, building project<br />
developers, <strong>and</strong> municipalities played central roles next <strong>to</strong> energy providers.<br />
PV is <strong>the</strong>refore also taken up increasingly in <strong>the</strong> realm of building, whereas<br />
its policy support is dominantly related <strong>to</strong> energy development. This is an<br />
example of <strong>the</strong> way broader <strong>institutional</strong>isation impacts <strong>the</strong> choices <strong>and</strong><br />
strategies regarding technologies such as PV that will provide different<br />
functions than traditional energy technologies.<br />
4.12 Biomass 43 emerges as <strong>the</strong> dominant <strong>sustainable</strong><br />
variety<br />
Biomass can be applied in various ways as a source for electricity<br />
generation. Four dominant principles exist in <strong>the</strong> route from biomass <strong>to</strong><br />
electricity, Figure 4.5 gives an overview.<br />
Combustion is <strong>the</strong> principle dominantly used because it applies <strong>the</strong> same<br />
technologies as in conventional electricity generation. For three o<strong>the</strong>r routes,<br />
gasification, pyrolysis <strong>and</strong> fermentation/digestion, biomass is first converted<br />
<strong>to</strong> gas or oil before it is fitted in<strong>to</strong> electricity production with steam turbines<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or gas turbines. These routes are generally considered <strong>to</strong> have larger<br />
potential in <strong>the</strong> long term because <strong>the</strong>y can provide more efficient <strong>and</strong><br />
cleaner electricity, but also because bio-fuel is a potential fuel source for <strong>the</strong><br />
transport sec<strong>to</strong>r.<br />
43 Here we use <strong>the</strong> term biomass <strong>to</strong> indicate renewable sources based on organic material<br />
(short-term carbon-neutral cycle). In this section we also characterise waste as biomass.<br />
The non-fossil part of waste is considered as renewable biomass, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fossil part, such<br />
as plastics, is considered non-renewable. Although EU policy initially suggested that waste<br />
incineration did not fall under biomass, after intensive lobbying of especially <strong>the</strong> Dutch, it<br />
has accepted <strong>the</strong> organic fraction of waste as renewable energy.