31.07.2013 Views

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

Innovation and institutional change: the transition to a sustainable ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90 Chapter 4<br />

– Application of nuclear energy reduces our dependency <strong>and</strong> improves<br />

stability of prices.<br />

Apart from exp<strong>and</strong>ing nuclear energy <strong>the</strong> general view expressed by <strong>the</strong><br />

electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r is that also coal-fired power plants should be exp<strong>and</strong>ed. A<br />

minority in <strong>the</strong> BMD discussion (11-18%) holds this view. The dominant<br />

views are that coal use should for <strong>the</strong> moment be very moderately exp<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

(36-44%) or that coal should be used as little as possible (39-51%).<br />

There was widespread agreement that research on possible application of<br />

renewable energy sources should be intensified 16 . The dominant opinion was<br />

that research <strong>and</strong> application should be started as quickly as possible (56-<br />

75%). Ano<strong>the</strong>r view was that renewable energy sources should be research<br />

<strong>and</strong> applied for in so far as possible (26-38%). Institutions from <strong>the</strong><br />

electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r clearly held this view <strong>and</strong> argue that renewable energy<br />

sources are both technically <strong>and</strong> economically only potential alternatives in<br />

<strong>the</strong> very long term 17 .<br />

In <strong>the</strong> BMD-process several sessions <strong>to</strong>ok place in which followers debated<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir different viewpoints <strong>and</strong> tried <strong>to</strong> convince <strong>the</strong> opposition <strong>to</strong> <strong>change</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir opinion. Observations of <strong>the</strong> steering group regarding <strong>the</strong>se controversy<br />

sessions were: 18<br />

– It was confirmed that societal beliefs, mental worlds ‘behind’ energy<br />

opinions play an important role, which hampers testing of energy<br />

opinions;<br />

– Government, <strong>the</strong> electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> technical experts sometimes have<br />

great difficulty <strong>to</strong> emphatise with views, opinions, prejudices en societal<br />

beliefs that are put forward by society. They (<strong>the</strong> experts) are not always<br />

able <strong>to</strong> recognise that also <strong>the</strong>ir own st<strong>and</strong>points are motivated by<br />

emotions based on norms <strong>and</strong> values.<br />

Summarising <strong>the</strong> national energy debate clearly illustrates <strong>the</strong> belief of <strong>the</strong><br />

electricity sec<strong>to</strong>r that large-scale application of both nuclear energy <strong>and</strong> coal<br />

is a logical <strong>and</strong> desired route for future energy supply. It also illustrates <strong>the</strong><br />

limited capacity of <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>to</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> especially of technical experts, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

majority of engineers, <strong>to</strong> disengage itself from <strong>the</strong> past achievements of <strong>the</strong><br />

electricity system, its artefacts <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> technologies that built <strong>the</strong> system.<br />

Despite societal resistance, but in line with <strong>the</strong> resource diversification<br />

orientation in national energy policies, <strong>the</strong> Dutch government approved<br />

16<br />

Stuurgroep Maatschappelijke Discussie Energiebeleid, Eindrapport BMD, pp. 165-175,<br />

1983.<br />

17<br />

Ibid. <strong>and</strong> appendix A1.<br />

18<br />

Stuurgroep Maatschappelijke Discussie Energiebeleid, Eindrapport BMD, pp. 38-39,<br />

1983.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!