REPORT OF AN INDEPENDENT INQUIRY ... - Hundred Families
REPORT OF AN INDEPENDENT INQUIRY ... - Hundred Families
REPORT OF AN INDEPENDENT INQUIRY ... - Hundred Families
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
36<br />
Chapter 5 – Relevant Events in 2001<br />
1. By 2001, Chandran was living in a housing association flat on his own. Sulekha Jaykumar lived<br />
in a different flat with Narayanan Sukumaran, her daughter and her husband when he came to<br />
England from India. She was largely responsible for caring for her father who was, by then,<br />
elderly and physically frail but Chandran appears to have visited their flat regularly.<br />
2. On 28th February 2001, Chandran went to work at W.H. Smith at Blackfriars Railway Station at<br />
about 5pm. Narayanan Sukumaran had been in hospital and Chandran wanted to have some time<br />
off to look after his father. He says his request was refused and he was angry and frustrated at<br />
having to go to work. Whilst at work, Chandran attacked a work colleague kicking him in the<br />
face with sufficient force that the colleague had to have root canal treatment to two of his teeth.<br />
Chandran claims that he felt under considerable stress because of his father’s condition and that<br />
he was provoked by his colleague at work and the attack then ensued.<br />
3. An independent witness to the attack described Chandran and his colleague arguing whilst he<br />
was in the shop. Whilst this witness was paying for his purchase, he saw Chandran hit his<br />
colleague around the head several times. There was then a short period of time when Chandran<br />
walked away and carried on serving the witness who said that he then saw Chandran kick his<br />
colleague in the face whilst the latter was bending over to get something out of a lower cupboard.<br />
Chandran lost his job as a result of this incident.<br />
4. In the view of the Inquiry Panel, the nature of the attack, namely hitting somebody around the<br />
head several times and then kicking him in the head with sufficient force that the victim needed<br />
to undergo root canal treatment, was serious.<br />
5. On 20th March 2001, Chandran pleaded guilty at Horseferry Road Magistrates’ Court to an<br />
offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm. The Court wished to have a pre-sentence<br />
report and psychiatric report before sentencing him and the case was therefore adjourned for<br />
those reports to be prepared.<br />
6. On 10th April 2001, a Probation Officer, Gill Lewis, wrote to Dr Röhricht telling him that<br />
Chandran had pleaded guilty to the offence of common assault, that this had involved his kicking<br />
a fellow employee in the head who had had to have root canal treatment to two teeth, that he had<br />
previous mental health problems and had been an inpatient at Goodmayes Hospital but was<br />
unable to remember the dates of the admission. She added that she had met Chandran and was<br />
“of the opinion that he does not present as a danger to you or any of your staff”.<br />
7. There is a manuscript note on the letter to Dr Röhricht which reads:<br />
“Frank. This patient was last seen by Dr Feldman in June 1992. He DNA’d (did not attend)<br />
in 7/97, 9/97 and was discharged in 4/98 for poor attendance.”<br />
As we have explained, we believe Chandran was seen in July 1997 in the outpatients clinic and<br />
as well by the CMHT in August 1997.