31.07.2013 Views

It must be understood by all those who read these charters that this ...

It must be understood by all those who read these charters that this ...

It must be understood by all those who read these charters that this ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SAXON LAND CHARTERS OF WILTSHIRE. I ~J\<br />

Hides. 50 hides. 1<br />

Name : in body of charter, Ceoseldene.<br />

Ident. K. Chiselden, Wilts. ; B. Chiseldon, Wilts.<br />

The survey of the charter is given in three forms,<br />

Saxon, Middle English, and Latin. That the Saxon copy<br />

goes back to an original of AS. times is practic<strong>all</strong>y certain.<br />

Of the extant copy it is not possible to speak so positively;<br />

but, if not made in AS. times, it <strong>must</strong> have <strong>be</strong>en made at<br />

some date very near to 1066. The ME. and Lat. copies<br />

are of the same date with one another, and may, judging<br />

from the forms of the words in them, have <strong>be</strong>en made a<br />

century or two after the Conquest. They are probably<br />

translations of the AS. copy made <strong>by</strong> one <strong>who</strong> had a good<br />

working knowledge of AS, though not a perfect knowledge<br />

of <strong>that</strong> language. He was at any rate in most instances able<br />

to identify the words of his own day which corresponded<br />

with the words used in the AS. survey.<br />

<strong>It</strong> will <strong>be</strong> well to take the landmarks of the surveys<br />

together, only giving the translation of the ME. and Lat.<br />

forms in cases where they either deviate from, or elucidate<br />

the AS. survey.<br />

Surveys.<br />

i. Aerest of Eorthe<strong>by</strong>rg to Sym.br oce innan Blaec Pytte :<br />

' First from the Earthen Camp to . . . Brook on the near<br />

side of the Black Pit.' 2<br />

Fyrst <strong>be</strong>gyn at Orbrygg<strong>be</strong>, so forth to Swymbroke<br />

wythinne the Blake Pytte :<br />

Imprimis ineipe in termino latine voeitato Pons Ίerrestris,<br />

angliee Orthebrygge 3 reete procedendo quousque pervenias ad<br />

1 <strong>It</strong> would <strong>be</strong> a very gratuitous assumption<br />

to assume <strong>that</strong> <strong>this</strong> num<strong>be</strong>r was miswritten<br />

in the text. But it is, on the other<br />

hand, quite impossible to suppose <strong>that</strong> the<br />

lands included in the survey amounted to<br />

anything remotely resembling 50 hides.<br />

The probability is <strong>that</strong> the grant referred<br />

to a group of land-units, massed together,<br />

perhaps for purposes of administration,<br />

under the name Ceoseldene, and <strong>that</strong> there<br />

were origin<strong>all</strong>y attached to the grant<br />

surveys of the other land-units included in<br />

it. The Blewbury charter in Berkshire<br />

records a grant stated to amount to 100<br />

hides (K.1151). Under Bradfield in Berks.<br />

(B.74) are grouped Streatley and Bessils-<br />

leigh, 4.5 hides altogether. There are<br />

similar groupings in certain Meon and<br />

Micheldever <strong>charters</strong> of Hants.<br />

2 Sym is probably a pre-Saxon name of the<br />

brook. I suspect <strong>that</strong> it is the same name<br />

which appears in the Hants place-name<br />

Somborne, and the Wilts, name Sambourn.<br />

<strong>It</strong> may even <strong>be</strong> the same as the river-name<br />

Sem, which gives its name to Semley in<br />

SW. Wilts, 4 m. NE. of Shaftesbury. A<br />

mere name which conveyed no meaning to<br />

the AS. settlers would tend to take slightly<br />

valiant forms in various districts.<br />

3 The adaptor of the AS. form has mistranslated<br />

the <strong>by</strong>rg of the survey, and has<br />

supposed it to mean ' bridge.'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!