31.07.2013 Views

It must be understood by all those who read these charters that this ...

It must be understood by all those who read these charters that this ...

It must be understood by all those who read these charters that this ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE SAXON LAND CHARTERS OF WILTSHIRE. I ~J\<br />

then S. of the Clif. <strong>It</strong> may, of course, have <strong>be</strong>en a barrow<br />

which has vanished ; or it may have <strong>be</strong>en <strong>that</strong> hill where<br />

(OMi) the quarries are marked about 5 fur. SSE. of<br />

Portash in Chilmark. Going further S. along <strong>this</strong> W. <strong>by</strong>.<br />

my impression is <strong>that</strong> the old <strong>by</strong>. did not follow the brook,<br />

as the present <strong>by</strong>. does, but rather the line of fence which<br />

runs down par<strong>all</strong>el with the brook, at an average distance of<br />

perhaps 100 yds. from it on the E. side. The strip of land<br />

<strong>be</strong>tween <strong>this</strong> line and the brook may have <strong>be</strong>en part of the<br />

mead of Teffont Evias. The Ford of 2 I should <strong>be</strong> inclined<br />

to place where the road from Teffont Evias crosses <strong>this</strong> brook<br />

at a point ^ m. due W. of Lower Chicksgrove (OMi) in<br />

Tisbury ; and the road itself I guess to <strong>be</strong> the red way of<br />

1 and 12 of the survey.<br />

Turning now to points 7-11, the old dyke of 8 is almost<br />

certainly <strong>that</strong> dyke which (OMi) runs along the ridge on<br />

the N. <strong>by</strong>. of Teffont Magna, a dyke also mentioned in the<br />

Wylye charter B.757. If Leon Beorh is rightly placed in the<br />

survey, then it <strong>must</strong> have <strong>be</strong>en somewhere on the W. <strong>by</strong>.<br />

<strong>be</strong>tween the Stortan Cumb and the dyke. I am inclined<br />

to suspect <strong>that</strong> the landmark has got displaced in the extant<br />

copy of the survey, and <strong>that</strong> it should have come after the<br />

dyke. In <strong>that</strong> case it would <strong>be</strong> the tumulus (OMi) near<br />

the NE. corner of the parish. The furrow of 9 presents<br />

great difficulty. <strong>It</strong> is not impossible, but it is improbable,<br />

<strong>that</strong> a furrow might <strong>be</strong> carried for a very long distance<br />

where no natural landmarks existed ; but the distance from<br />

the NE. corner of the parish to the Nadder is over 3 m.<br />

My impression is <strong>that</strong> several landmarks have f<strong>all</strong>en out<br />

from <strong>this</strong> copy of the charter <strong>be</strong>tween 8 and 9, and <strong>that</strong> the<br />

furrow was towards the S. end of the E. <strong>by</strong>. The furrow<br />

ran down to the river, but the <strong>by</strong>. did not. The Funtnes<br />

Ford <strong>must</strong> have <strong>be</strong>en over the Fefunt stream. I suspect <strong>that</strong><br />

it was where the road crosses <strong>that</strong> stream at the head of<br />

the lake in Teffont Park. Points 11 and 12 are probably<br />

re<strong>all</strong>y one landmark, where Herepath merely defines the<br />

nature of the red way, the road going to Ley Farm (OMi)<br />

to the Ford of 2.<br />

Charter of lands including the <strong>who</strong>le of Buttermere,<br />

5 m. S. of Hungerford, and parts, at any rate, of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!