30.07.2013 Views

WAVES AND VIBRATIONS IN INHOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURES ...

WAVES AND VIBRATIONS IN INHOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURES ...

WAVES AND VIBRATIONS IN INHOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURES ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4 Maximizing wave dissipation 23<br />

a) b) c)<br />

Figure 3.5 Optimized designs for the case of multi-directional wave input with a design<br />

domain length of twice the wavelength of a shear wave. The design domain height equals<br />

the length. Designs obtained for a) Pressure wave, b) Shear wave, c) Both pressure and<br />

shear wave. From paper [5].<br />

can excite high vibration levels.<br />

Fig. 3.6 shows two examples of optimized distribution of two materials in a 1D<br />

elastic bar and the corresponding vibration response. The response is recorded<br />

in one end of the bar when the structure is subjected to a periodic load in the<br />

other end 3 . The structures are obtained by formulating the optimization problem<br />

so that the separation of two adjacent eigenfrequencies is maximized. The resulting<br />

structures are clearly periodic-like bandgap structures with alternating sections of<br />

the two materials corresponding to the design variables taking the values 0 and 1.<br />

It is also evident that there exists a direct relation between the modes that are<br />

separated and the number of material sections in the optimized structure.<br />

Additionally, it turns out that there is a direct connection between a single<br />

material contrast parameter and the maximum eigenfrequency separation that can<br />

be obtained. Here, the separation is quantified as the ratio between two adjacent<br />

eigenfrequencies. Fig. 3.7 shows the eigenfrequency separation for the optimized<br />

structures versus the mode numbers that are separated. Depending only on the<br />

contrast parameter β = ρ2E2/(ρ1E1), an asymptotic limit is found for how much<br />

the eigenfrequencies can be separated. Here, E and ρ denote Young’s modulus and<br />

mass density, respectively.<br />

Itcanalsobeshownthatthefractionoccupiedbyeachofthetwomaterialsinthe<br />

optimized structure relates directly to the contrast parameter α = ρ1E2/(ρ2E1). For<br />

instance, it is observed that if α = 1 then the two materials are equally represented<br />

in the optimized design.<br />

3.4 Maximizing wave dissipation<br />

All results presented so far have focused on the ability of bandgap (or periodic-like)<br />

structures to quench vibrations or to reflect waves. However, another interesting<br />

3 The 1D problem is supplemented by a similar problem in 2D in paper [7]. This is the contribution<br />

of the co-author Niels L. Pedersen.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!