WAVES AND VIBRATIONS IN INHOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURES ...
WAVES AND VIBRATIONS IN INHOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURES ...
WAVES AND VIBRATIONS IN INHOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURES ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Inverse design of phononic crystals by tobology optimization 901<br />
f [kHz]<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
8cm 5.7cm<br />
Γ<br />
X<br />
Fig. 6. Top: 5 by 4 unit cells of a simple slab-like crystal consisting<br />
of 71% Aluminum inclusions (black) in a PMMA material. Bottom:<br />
Dispersion diagram for in-plane polarized waves in a PMMA/Aluminum<br />
grating with Aluminum slab to cell width ratio of 0.71. The first<br />
25 modes for propagation in the horizontal direction are shown and<br />
bold lines indicate longitudinal modes. The grey areas indicate band<br />
gaps.<br />
Numerical examples<br />
First we consider in-plane polarized elastic waves in a 2D<br />
elastic crystal with a square base cell size measuring 8 cm<br />
by 8 cm. To compare the results with the beam case, we<br />
initially perform an analysis of waves propagating along<br />
the x-axis through a grated plate consisting of alternating<br />
PMMA and Aluminum slabs with the slab to cell width<br />
ratios of 0.29 and and 0.71, respectively, as given by the<br />
result from Fig. 1. The resulting dispersion diagram for<br />
the first 25 eigenvalues for horizontally propagating waves<br />
(i.e. wave vectors along the line G X in Fig. 5) is shown<br />
in Fig. 6. The thick lines indicate the longitudinal modes<br />
and the thin lines indicate in-plane elastic shear waves.<br />
The thick lines for longitudinal waves do not fully match<br />
the full lines for the beam longitudinal waves in Fig. 1<br />
because of slightly different base cell sizes, and the Poisson’s<br />
ratio effect. As opposed to the beam case, however,<br />
the dispersion diagram is “polluted” with in-plane elastic<br />
shear waves (thin lines) and there are only four narrow<br />
band gaps as indicated by the grey boxes. It is not obvious<br />
between which bands the gap will be largest for<br />
waves propagating along the x-axis. In order to optimize<br />
the structure, we first perform a simple parameter study<br />
where we vary the relative width of the Aluminum slabs<br />
and find the maximum band gap for the grated structure.<br />
The result of this study is that the largest gap is found<br />
between the 3rd and the 4th band for an Aluminum slab<br />
to cell width ratio of 0.42. The dispersion diagram for this<br />
structure is shown in Fig. 7 and the size of the relative<br />
band gap is 0.452. The dispersion diagram in Fig. 7 can<br />
be compared with the transmission diagram for the optimized<br />
finite periodic structure in Fig. 13.<br />
f [kHz]<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
35<br />
25<br />
15<br />
5<br />
0<br />
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3<br />
Γ<br />
8cm 3.4cm<br />
Fig. 7. Top: 5 by 4 unit cells of a simple optimized slab-like crystal<br />
consisting of 42% Aluminum inclusions (black) in a PMMA material.<br />
Bottom: Dispersion diagram for in-plane polarized waves propagating<br />
in the x-direction. The bold lines indicate longitudinal modes. The<br />
grey areas indicate band gaps and the relative size of the first band<br />
gap is 0.45.<br />
Now one may ask the question whether it is possible to<br />
obtain a larger band gap for waves propagating in the<br />
x-direction if one allows the topology of the grating to<br />
vary? Indeed, this is possible. The result of a topology<br />
optimization process where no symmetry was imposed on<br />
the square base cell and the gap between the 3rd and the<br />
4th bands was optimized is seen in Fig. 8. The optimization<br />
problem corresponded to Eq. (11), except that the design<br />
variables for this case were the 3364 nodal density<br />
variables in the FE mesh used to discretize the base cell.<br />
The obtained relative band gap size is 0.525, i.e. approximately<br />
15% better than the simple grating from Fig. 7.<br />
The topology in Fig. 8 is an interesting variation of the<br />
simple grating that apparently raises the shear mode bands<br />
that define the upper edge of the gap.<br />
If we want to create a band gap for all wave directions<br />
simultaneously, we have to optimize the band gap for all<br />
wave-vectors on the edges of the triangular areas indicated<br />
in Fig. 5. The results of this study for the square base cell<br />
is a square Aluminum inclusion with slightly rounded corners<br />
which has a relative band gap of 0.428. For the rhombic<br />
base cell the optimized topology is shown in Fig. 9.<br />
The bases cells were both discretized by 6728 triangular<br />
first order elements. The optimized relative band gap size<br />
is 0.505 for the rhombic base cell. Both values are, as<br />
expected, lower than for the directionally optimized topology<br />
in Fig. 7. It is seen that the topology with the largest<br />
complete band gap is a hexagonal array of PMMA matrix<br />
material with circular inclusions of Aluminum (Fig. 9). As<br />
discussed in Ref. [11], the optimal topology depends on<br />
the material properties and must therefore always be optimized<br />
for the particular materials considered.<br />
Now we repeat the same study for bending waves.<br />
X