30.07.2013 Views

WAVES AND VIBRATIONS IN INHOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURES ...

WAVES AND VIBRATIONS IN INHOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURES ...

WAVES AND VIBRATIONS IN INHOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURES ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Inverse design of phononic crystals by tobology optimization 901<br />

f [kHz]<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

8cm 5.7cm<br />

Γ<br />

X<br />

Fig. 6. Top: 5 by 4 unit cells of a simple slab-like crystal consisting<br />

of 71% Aluminum inclusions (black) in a PMMA material. Bottom:<br />

Dispersion diagram for in-plane polarized waves in a PMMA/Aluminum<br />

grating with Aluminum slab to cell width ratio of 0.71. The first<br />

25 modes for propagation in the horizontal direction are shown and<br />

bold lines indicate longitudinal modes. The grey areas indicate band<br />

gaps.<br />

Numerical examples<br />

First we consider in-plane polarized elastic waves in a 2D<br />

elastic crystal with a square base cell size measuring 8 cm<br />

by 8 cm. To compare the results with the beam case, we<br />

initially perform an analysis of waves propagating along<br />

the x-axis through a grated plate consisting of alternating<br />

PMMA and Aluminum slabs with the slab to cell width<br />

ratios of 0.29 and and 0.71, respectively, as given by the<br />

result from Fig. 1. The resulting dispersion diagram for<br />

the first 25 eigenvalues for horizontally propagating waves<br />

(i.e. wave vectors along the line G X in Fig. 5) is shown<br />

in Fig. 6. The thick lines indicate the longitudinal modes<br />

and the thin lines indicate in-plane elastic shear waves.<br />

The thick lines for longitudinal waves do not fully match<br />

the full lines for the beam longitudinal waves in Fig. 1<br />

because of slightly different base cell sizes, and the Poisson’s<br />

ratio effect. As opposed to the beam case, however,<br />

the dispersion diagram is “polluted” with in-plane elastic<br />

shear waves (thin lines) and there are only four narrow<br />

band gaps as indicated by the grey boxes. It is not obvious<br />

between which bands the gap will be largest for<br />

waves propagating along the x-axis. In order to optimize<br />

the structure, we first perform a simple parameter study<br />

where we vary the relative width of the Aluminum slabs<br />

and find the maximum band gap for the grated structure.<br />

The result of this study is that the largest gap is found<br />

between the 3rd and the 4th band for an Aluminum slab<br />

to cell width ratio of 0.42. The dispersion diagram for this<br />

structure is shown in Fig. 7 and the size of the relative<br />

band gap is 0.452. The dispersion diagram in Fig. 7 can<br />

be compared with the transmission diagram for the optimized<br />

finite periodic structure in Fig. 13.<br />

f [kHz]<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

35<br />

25<br />

15<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3<br />

Γ<br />

8cm 3.4cm<br />

Fig. 7. Top: 5 by 4 unit cells of a simple optimized slab-like crystal<br />

consisting of 42% Aluminum inclusions (black) in a PMMA material.<br />

Bottom: Dispersion diagram for in-plane polarized waves propagating<br />

in the x-direction. The bold lines indicate longitudinal modes. The<br />

grey areas indicate band gaps and the relative size of the first band<br />

gap is 0.45.<br />

Now one may ask the question whether it is possible to<br />

obtain a larger band gap for waves propagating in the<br />

x-direction if one allows the topology of the grating to<br />

vary? Indeed, this is possible. The result of a topology<br />

optimization process where no symmetry was imposed on<br />

the square base cell and the gap between the 3rd and the<br />

4th bands was optimized is seen in Fig. 8. The optimization<br />

problem corresponded to Eq. (11), except that the design<br />

variables for this case were the 3364 nodal density<br />

variables in the FE mesh used to discretize the base cell.<br />

The obtained relative band gap size is 0.525, i.e. approximately<br />

15% better than the simple grating from Fig. 7.<br />

The topology in Fig. 8 is an interesting variation of the<br />

simple grating that apparently raises the shear mode bands<br />

that define the upper edge of the gap.<br />

If we want to create a band gap for all wave directions<br />

simultaneously, we have to optimize the band gap for all<br />

wave-vectors on the edges of the triangular areas indicated<br />

in Fig. 5. The results of this study for the square base cell<br />

is a square Aluminum inclusion with slightly rounded corners<br />

which has a relative band gap of 0.428. For the rhombic<br />

base cell the optimized topology is shown in Fig. 9.<br />

The bases cells were both discretized by 6728 triangular<br />

first order elements. The optimized relative band gap size<br />

is 0.505 for the rhombic base cell. Both values are, as<br />

expected, lower than for the directionally optimized topology<br />

in Fig. 7. It is seen that the topology with the largest<br />

complete band gap is a hexagonal array of PMMA matrix<br />

material with circular inclusions of Aluminum (Fig. 9). As<br />

discussed in Ref. [11], the optimal topology depends on<br />

the material properties and must therefore always be optimized<br />

for the particular materials considered.<br />

Now we repeat the same study for bending waves.<br />

X

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!