FILM FILM - University of Macau Library

FILM FILM - University of Macau Library FILM FILM - University of Macau Library

library.umac.mo
from library.umac.mo More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

From Scientist to Clown – He Who Gets Slapped 45 the circus but her father wants to marry her off to Baron Regnard. As the latter is recognized by “He”, it all comes to a dramatic ending. “He” prepares the lion’s cage, Consuelo’s father stabs him, and in the upcoming chaos, the count and Baron Regnard try to escape, but are caught by the lion. “He” stumbles out into the arena with a bloody piece of cloth, a heart, in his hand, and dies. This is followed by a new bareback act, which is applauded by the audience. The film was shot during one month, starting 17 June and, according to the production reports, was finished no less than six weeks later. 6 It premiered on 9 November 1924 at the Capitol in New York. According to Sjöström in his “unwritten memoirs” published in the Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter, the whole working process was a positive experience: as if I had made a film during the good old times. Like at home in Sweden, in other words. I was allowed to make my script without interference, and the shooting was made quickly and without a hitch. In a month, the whole film was finished. 7 He Who Gets Slapped was hailed by both critics and audience, and new box office takings were recorded at the Capitol, which celebrated its fifth anniversary: it made “a one-day world’s record business with $15,000, a one-week’s record business with $71,900, and a two-week’s record with $121,574. The same success was reported throughout the country.” 8 In Sweden, however, an influential critic like the writer Sven Stolpe discovered an American influence in the film, and thus expressed a certain ambivalence: He Who Gets Slapped is a strong dramatic piece, rich with intensely captivating scenes. Some might be considered as too “American” –in any case, they would have been unthinkable in Sjöström’s Swedish films. We think of such a horrible scene as the one where the lion dashes into the small room and before the eyes of the dying clown tears his two enemies to pieces! Still, the boundary between the sensational and the tasteless is never crossed. 9 Voices in the American press were unanimously positive, the Photoplay critic comparing it to Name the Man, which he considered a failure, but stating that “this adaption of Leonid Andreyev’s ‘He Who Gets Slapped’ is a superb thing – and it lifts Seastrom to the very front rank of directors, and Mordaunt Hall in The New York Times commenting that “Mr Seastrom has directed this dramatic story with all the genius of a Chaplin or a Lubitsch, and he has accomplished more than they have in their respective works”. 10 The comparison with Lubitsch, another European, is particularly interesting as he, like Sjöström, had come from Europe – but was discussed as an American director. The tendency is similar in the treatment of Sjöström’s later works in the United States; apparently, the imported directors became naturalized rather quickly. Still, in Seastrom’s case, critics seemed to be sensitive about his past with its low-key effects,

46 Transition and Transformation as a comment from Exceptional Photoplays reveals: “The picture is full of typical Seastrom effects. He is the master of light and shade and knows how to get the most out of his groupings without using huge mobs.” 11 In retrospect, it is striking that both Name the Man and He Who Gets Slapped were featured in Motion Picture Magazine in January 1924 and January 1925 respectively (the last issue of the magazine that was devoted to film stories appeared in September 1925). 12 The aim of these film stories issues in the monthly magazine was to further exploit the films produced by retelling their plots in new versions, as short stories, along with publicity photos and ‘behind the scenes’ profiles of popular movie personalities. As the concept had become quite established, the fact that Sjöström’s first two films in Hollywood were actually included also testifies to the importance ascribed to them. The magazine was independent in relation to the production companies, but in reality, it also helped to attract new audiences to the films chosen. Photoplay editions, which had been used systematically since the 1910s, were another way of recycling film material for commercial purposes. They were cheap reprints of original novels, released to coincide with the premiere of a motion picture, with film stills both on the cover and illustrating the text. One of the largest publishing houses in this context was New York-based Grosset & Dunlap. In the case of He Who Gets Slapped, however, the photoplay edition is particularly interesting. Here, a tie-in was produced; a novelization of Andreyev’s play and the Sjöström film, by a totally unknown writer, George A. Carlin, which combined elements from both sources. The fact that Carlin was anonymous as a writer is interesting; usually, the commercial concept of photoplay editions was based on the successful combination of a well-known writer and a newly released picture. Here, however, the editors seem to have relied almost uniquely on the picture, as stated on the front page: “With scenes from the photoplay, A Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Picture”. (FIG. 3) For Sjöström’s next Hollywood film, Confessions of a Queen, another publishing house, A. L. Burt Company, took up the competition in publishing Alphonse Daudet’s Kings in Exile, with an added explanation on the cover: “Screened as Confessions of a Queen”. This choice of a non-American literary source was an exception in Sjöström’s case. The two stories by American novelists later brought to the screen by Sjöström during the Hollywood years, The Scarlet Letter and The Wind, were again published by Grosset & Dunlap, a publishing house which seems to have had a flair for success, as they published editions of the three films that have generally been considered the most important during the Hollywood years. The fact that no less than four of his films were released as photoplay editions also testifies to the recognition of Sjöström as a successful American director, an acknowledged part of the Hollywood dream factory.

46 Transition and Transformation<br />

as a comment from Exceptional Photoplays reveals: “The picture is full <strong>of</strong> typical<br />

Seastrom effects. He is the master <strong>of</strong> light and shade and knows how to get the<br />

most out <strong>of</strong> his groupings without using huge mobs.” 11<br />

In retrospect, it is striking that both Name the Man and He Who Gets<br />

Slapped were featured in Motion Picture Magazine in January 1924 and January<br />

1925 respectively (the last issue <strong>of</strong> the magazine that was devoted to film stories<br />

appeared in September 1925). 12 The aim <strong>of</strong> these film stories issues in the<br />

monthly magazine was to further exploit the films produced by retelling their<br />

plots in new versions, as short stories, along with publicity photos and ‘behind<br />

the scenes’ pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> popular movie personalities. As the concept had become<br />

quite established, the fact that Sjöström’s first two films in Hollywood were actually<br />

included also testifies to the importance ascribed to them. The magazine<br />

was independent in relation to the production companies, but in reality, it also<br />

helped to attract new audiences to the films chosen.<br />

Photoplay editions, which had been used systematically since the 1910s, were<br />

another way <strong>of</strong> recycling film material for commercial purposes. They were<br />

cheap reprints <strong>of</strong> original novels, released to coincide with the premiere <strong>of</strong> a<br />

motion picture, with film stills both on the cover and illustrating the text. One<br />

<strong>of</strong> the largest publishing houses in this context was New York-based Grosset &<br />

Dunlap. In the case <strong>of</strong> He Who Gets Slapped, however, the photoplay edition<br />

is particularly interesting. Here, a tie-in was produced; a novelization <strong>of</strong> Andreyev’s<br />

play and the Sjöström film, by a totally unknown writer, George A.<br />

Carlin, which combined elements from both sources. The fact that Carlin was<br />

anonymous as a writer is interesting; usually, the commercial concept <strong>of</strong> photoplay<br />

editions was based on the successful combination <strong>of</strong> a well-known writer<br />

and a newly released picture. Here, however, the editors seem to have relied<br />

almost uniquely on the picture, as stated on the front page: “With scenes from<br />

the photoplay, A Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Picture”. (FIG. 3)<br />

For Sjöström’s next Hollywood film, Confessions <strong>of</strong> a Queen, another publishing<br />

house, A. L. Burt Company, took up the competition in publishing Alphonse<br />

Daudet’s Kings in Exile, with an added explanation on the cover:<br />

“Screened as Confessions <strong>of</strong> a Queen”. This choice <strong>of</strong> a non-American literary<br />

source was an exception in Sjöström’s case.<br />

The two stories by American novelists later brought to the screen by Sjöström<br />

during the Hollywood years, The Scarlet Letter and The Wind, were again<br />

published by Grosset & Dunlap, a publishing house which seems to have had a<br />

flair for success, as they published editions <strong>of</strong> the three films that have generally<br />

been considered the most important during the Hollywood years. The fact that<br />

no less than four <strong>of</strong> his films were released as photoplay editions also testifies to<br />

the recognition <strong>of</strong> Sjöström as a successful American director, an acknowledged<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the Hollywood dream factory.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!