FILM FILM - University of Macau Library

FILM FILM - University of Macau Library FILM FILM - University of Macau Library

library.umac.mo
from library.umac.mo More from this publisher
29.07.2013 Views

A European in Hollywood – Name the Man and the Shift of Production Systems 39 across the line occurs at a turning point in the narrative, where the perspective on the diegetic level in one way or the other seems to be reversed as well. In this case, Victor is named a judge. The Phantom Carriage, which contains no less than eighteen cuts across the line, may help to illustrate the point. Here, Georges, the future driver of the phantom carriage, is just about to tell its fatal story when there is a cut across the line of him sitting at a table leaning forward, his head in his hands, surrounded by his three listeners. Directly on this cut follows an intertitle: 110. LONG SHOT OF THEM /from the other side/. The light from the lamp faintly illuminates their faces, where they stand leaning over Georges. He lifts his head, looks up at them in fear and starts to speak again. Title: “There is an old, old carriage –”. 35 This clearly shows that this cut had already been planned at the script stage, and that it is not a mistake in continuity editing, but a conscious narrative device. Another occasion where a cut across the line occurs is the scene where David with an axe cuts his way through the door to access the other side, where his wife and children try to hide, and where the cut unites the two separate rooms to one, single 360-degree cinematic space, which lets the spectator take part in the drama from the point of view of both the main protagonists. 36 Interestingly, this device was used by other Europeans as well, not least by Sjöström’s contemporary in Soviet cinema, Eisenstein. Vladimir Nizhny, his pupil, tells in his book Lessons with Eisenstein: how the master theorized his doctrines of the “montage unit”, which advocates dividing up a given sequence into subsequences defined by successive crossings of the 180° line. These “bad” position/direction matches were, according to Nizhny, of course meant to emphasize privileged moments of tensions in the narrative flow. 37 As I have suggested elsewhere, the dissolve in Name the Man might serve the particular purpose of softening the spatial reversal. 38 This seems all the more likely as it did not figure in the original script but was precisely one of those details added during shooting and editing, thus appearing only in the cutting continuity script. The only time that a reverse camera position is inscribed into Bern’s script is, quite conventionally, on the occasion of a subjective image which Bern clarifies by adding the phrase: “showing [...] what he sees”. 39 Likewise, the dissolve is planned for quite conventional use in the script, first between the credit titles, and then also introducing the only flashback in the film. In the finished film, however, two more dissolves worthy of attention are added. An exterior medium shot of Bessie in a rainstorm, cuddling a lamb on

40 Transition and Transformation her lap, dissolves to an iris on a small dog, which, on its opening to an interior medium shot, is revealed to be on Fenella’s lap, who is sitting comfortably at home talking to Victor. An iris down on the dog is followed by a new dissolve and an iris opening, back to a medium shot of Bessie and the lamb. Whereas these dissolves are clearly marked in the cutting continuity script, it is easy to miss them in the existing copy of the film, as Graham Petrie does, who mentions the scene as an example of crosscutting. 40 This was also the original intention. In Paul Bern’s script, there is no dog and hence the parallel as such is weaker, and the scene transition is also marked by the words “Cut sharply”. 41 Here again, a comparison to The Phantom Carriage might illustrate the function of the dissolve. The whole narrative development in the film could be said to be condensed within one contrasting dissolve, where a triangle with David’s wife, himself and his brother is changed for an almost identical triangle where the wife has been replaced by the drinking companion, Georges, and the picnic by the bottle. This dissolve, which appears as part of the driver Georges’ story, is one of the most condensed transitions between two shots in the film: in an ellipsis, it contains the whole transformation of the main character David Holm from happy family man to miserable human wreck. It also has an ironic function: the wife with the food changed to Georges with the bottle, as a metonymy for alcoholism. This transition between shots is also included at the script stage, with the exact parallelism between the two shots marked, which provides the effect of an analogy: 201. Long shot of them. There is a happy and, at the same time, peaceful atmosphere over the picture. While they serve themselves of the food and start eating, the picture fades away and another appears instead. 202. On the same spot. David Holm is seated exactly at the same place as before, but is now rather poorly dressed. In Mrs. Holm’s place, Georges is sitting, dressed in his long, stained coat and big scarf. David’s brother also sits at the same place as in the previous shot – he also looks rather decayed. He sits and plays his mouth-organ and is seemingly rather drunk. Some empty bottles lie between them where the table was laid in the previous shot. Georges sits and sucks the stump of a cigar and beats time with his stick. David Holm mixes beer and aquavit in a bottle and shakes it, the image fades out. 42 In The Phantom Carriage as in Name the Man, the clear structural parallel between the two images adds a new dimension to the interpretation of the film’s meaning. These examples of style clearly indicate continuity between Sweden and Hollywood, where Sjöström has preserved his characteristic signature in spite of

A European in Hollywood – Name the Man and the Shift <strong>of</strong> Production Systems 39<br />

across the line occurs at a turning point in the narrative, where the perspective<br />

on the diegetic level in one way or the other seems to be reversed as well. In this<br />

case, Victor is named a judge.<br />

The Phantom Carriage, which contains no less than eighteen cuts across<br />

the line, may help to illustrate the point. Here, Georges, the future driver <strong>of</strong> the<br />

phantom carriage, is just about to tell its fatal story when there is a cut across<br />

the line <strong>of</strong> him sitting at a table leaning forward, his head in his hands, surrounded<br />

by his three listeners. Directly on this cut follows an intertitle:<br />

110.<br />

LONG SHOT OF THEM /from the other side/. The light from the lamp faintly illuminates<br />

their faces, where they stand leaning over Georges. He lifts his head, looks up at<br />

them in fear and starts to speak again.<br />

Title: “There is an old, old carriage –”. 35<br />

This clearly shows that this cut had already been planned at the script stage,<br />

and that it is not a mistake in continuity editing, but a conscious narrative device.<br />

Another occasion where a cut across the line occurs is the scene where<br />

David with an axe cuts his way through the door to access the other side, where<br />

his wife and children try to hide, and where the cut unites the two separate<br />

rooms to one, single 360-degree cinematic space, which lets the spectator take<br />

part in the drama from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> both the main protagonists. 36<br />

Interestingly, this device was used by other Europeans as well, not least by<br />

Sjöström’s contemporary in Soviet cinema, Eisenstein. Vladimir Nizhny, his pupil,<br />

tells in his book Lessons with Eisenstein:<br />

how the master theorized his doctrines <strong>of</strong> the “montage unit”, which advocates dividing<br />

up a given sequence into subsequences defined by successive crossings <strong>of</strong> the 180°<br />

line. These “bad” position/direction matches were, according to Nizhny, <strong>of</strong> course<br />

meant to emphasize privileged moments <strong>of</strong> tensions in the narrative flow. 37<br />

As I have suggested elsewhere, the dissolve in Name the Man might serve the<br />

particular purpose <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tening the spatial reversal. 38 This seems all the more<br />

likely as it did not figure in the original script but was precisely one <strong>of</strong> those<br />

details added during shooting and editing, thus appearing only in the cutting<br />

continuity script.<br />

The only time that a reverse camera position is inscribed into Bern’s script is,<br />

quite conventionally, on the occasion <strong>of</strong> a subjective image which Bern clarifies<br />

by adding the phrase: “showing [...] what he sees”. 39 Likewise, the dissolve is<br />

planned for quite conventional use in the script, first between the credit titles,<br />

and then also introducing the only flashback in the film.<br />

In the finished film, however, two more dissolves worthy <strong>of</strong> attention are<br />

added. An exterior medium shot <strong>of</strong> Bessie in a rainstorm, cuddling a lamb on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!