29.07.2013 Views

FILM FILM - University of Macau Library

FILM FILM - University of Macau Library

FILM FILM - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 Transition and Transformation<br />

years, he returns to the same question and relates the virtual terror he experienced<br />

while shooting his first scenes there. A sequence in Name the Man revolves<br />

around a pregnant girl whose family has thrown her out <strong>of</strong> the house<br />

and left her to wander down a dark road on a stormy night. During the afternoon,<br />

Sjöström took his assistant and cameraman to the remote rural spot in<br />

order to explain what he was trying to do with the scene.<br />

“Don’t worry, Mr Seastrom”–those were probably the words I heard most frequently<br />

in California –“We’ll take care <strong>of</strong> everything, you don’t have to come until 8 PM when<br />

it gets dark out.” Just imagine my surprise when I showed up and found a whole little<br />

crowd there. I asked my assistant who they were, and he said that they were simply<br />

the crew that would be helping us during the evening: a bunch <strong>of</strong> electricians, people<br />

to run the wind and rain machines, assistant cameramen, you name it – not to mention<br />

the orchestra. “An orchestra?” I inquired. Sure enough, there was a little quartet that<br />

was going to play. “But won’t the wind machines drown them out?” I persisted.<br />

“Sure”, he answered, “but the studio has already hired them, and they might as well<br />

hang around and liven things up a little during the breaks.” I snuck around and<br />

counted the technical crew – 63 people in all, myself included. Back in Sweden, we<br />

would have made it with 12 or 14. Think about it – a crew <strong>of</strong> 63 for a single actress. 19<br />

Sjöström’s accounts are much more interesting than the anecdotal form might<br />

suggest. Source material concerning the evolution <strong>of</strong> the production system<br />

during the 1910s and1920s is characteristically poor. The conclusions that may<br />

be drawn are general, based upon small-scale development in Sweden, which<br />

hints at a situation similar to the French film industry during the same period.<br />

Thompson characterized this as a “director unit system”, as in Hollywood during<br />

the period 1909-1914, where the director also functioned as producer. 20 The<br />

director’s responsibility and control over the script stage is confirmed by the<br />

credits, and the salary lists show the number <strong>of</strong> persons involved in the productions,<br />

but without specifying their tasks. However, Sjöström’s reactions, positive<br />

as well as negative, to the new production context, confirm and specify this<br />

picture. How, then, did this adjustment take place?<br />

Contaminating Hollywood<br />

Hypotheses vary about the degree <strong>of</strong> independence enjoyed by European directors<br />

within the Hollywood system. Concerning Sjöström, it is <strong>of</strong>ten mentioned<br />

that he, like other Scandinavians, met difficulties and setbacks in the new country.<br />

However, the historical perspective varies: whereas contemporary critics<br />

tended to see the Europeans as prisoners <strong>of</strong> the system, later historians have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!