29.07.2013 Views

Reproduction performances and conditions of group-housed non ...

Reproduction performances and conditions of group-housed non ...

Reproduction performances and conditions of group-housed non ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- General discussion -<br />

GENERAL DISCUSSION<br />

The specific aims <strong>of</strong> this thesis were 1) to identify important causes for impaired reproduction<br />

performance in <strong>group</strong> <strong>housed</strong> sows <strong>and</strong> 2) to define <strong>and</strong> evaluate indicators suitable for<br />

use in decision-making to improve the reproduction performance <strong>of</strong> commercial herds with<br />

<strong>group</strong> <strong>housed</strong> sows.<br />

Based upon a review study, the hypotheses put forward were: 1) individual variation in energy<br />

intake as well as fear <strong>and</strong> social stress might be important causes for impaired reproduction<br />

performance in <strong>group</strong> <strong>housed</strong> <strong>non</strong>-lactating sows, <strong>and</strong> 2) back fat, skin lesions <strong>and</strong><br />

behavioural measurements might be indicators <strong>of</strong> these characteristics, suitable to express<br />

variation in sows’ reproduction performance under practical <strong>conditions</strong>.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the detailed farm study, including 14 commercial herds, supported that <strong>group</strong><br />

housing may lead to individual variation in feed intake severe enough to impair pregnancy<br />

rate <strong>and</strong> perhaps also litter size (Paper IV). The 14 herds were chosen to represent different<br />

layouts <strong>and</strong> management routines to ensure that any relation found could be transferred to a<br />

broad spectrum <strong>of</strong> herds. For the 554 sows followed, a significantly (P=0.02), positive correlation<br />

between back fat gain <strong>and</strong> chance <strong>of</strong> pregnancy was found <strong>and</strong> further a tendency<br />

(P=0.08) to a positive correlation between back fat gain <strong>and</strong> litter size. The modelled relations<br />

indicate that a sow with a negative back fat gain <strong>of</strong> 0.5 mm per week has 5 percentage<br />

points lower chance <strong>of</strong> pregnancy after first mating <strong>and</strong> 0.6 fewer born piglets per litter<br />

compared to a sow with a positive back fat gain <strong>of</strong> 0.5 mm per week. In addition, it was<br />

found that sows eating less than 20% <strong>of</strong> all observations three weeks after mating had a<br />

significantly (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!