- Paper III - Rousing, T., Bonde, M. & Sørensen, J.T. 1999. Fear testing in loose housing systems for pregnant sows. Poster presentation. 1999. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 33rd International Congress <strong>of</strong> the international Society for Applied Ethology (ISAE), 17-21 august 1999, Lillehammer Norway. Ruis, M.A.W., te Brake, J.H.A., Engel, B., Buist, W.G., Blokhuis, H.J. & Koolhaas, J.M. 2002. Implications <strong>of</strong> coping characteristics <strong>and</strong> social status for welfare <strong>and</strong> production <strong>of</strong> paired growing gilts. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 75, 207-231. SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS/STAT ® User's Guide. Gary, NC. Svendsen, J., Andersson, M., Olsson, A.-C., Rantzer, D. & Lundqvist, P. 1990. Grupphållning av drägtiga suggor i isolerade och oisolerade stallar. En beskrivning av resultaten från enkätunder - sökningar, gårdsbesök och grupperingsförsök. Rapport 66, Institutionen för lantbrukets byggnadsteknik, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, 202pp. Thorup, F. 2004. Ph.D. The National Committee for Pig Production, Danish Bacon <strong>and</strong> Meat Council. Personal Communication. Axeltorv 3, 1609 Copenhagen V. Tsuma, V.T., Einarsson, S., Madej, A., Kindahl, H., Lundeheim, N. & Rojkittikhun, T. 1996. Endocrine changes during <strong>group</strong> housing <strong>of</strong> primaparous sows in early pregnancy. Acta vet. Sc<strong>and</strong>. 37, 481-490. Venables, W.N. & Ripley, B.D. 2002. Modern Applied statistics with S. Fourth Edition. Springer, ISBN 0- 387-95457-0 Zak, L.J., Cosgrove, J.R., Aherne, F.X & Foxcr<strong>of</strong>t, G.R. 1997. Pattern <strong>of</strong> feed intake <strong>and</strong> associated metabolic <strong>and</strong> endocrine changes differentially affect postweaning fertility on primiparous lactating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 75, 208-216. 86
- Paper IV - Relation between reproduction performance <strong>and</strong> indicators <strong>of</strong> feed intake, fear <strong>and</strong> social stress in commercial herds with <strong>group</strong> <strong>housed</strong> <strong>non</strong>lactating sows A.G. Kongsted Department <strong>of</strong> Agroecology, Danish Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 50, DK- 8830 Tjele 87 ІV
- Page 1 and 2:
Reproduction performances and condi
- Page 4:
Contents Summary………………
- Page 7 and 8:
Paper II - Summary - A review of 15
- Page 10 and 11:
- Sammendrag - SAMMENDRAG Antallet
- Page 12:
- Sammendrag - søgt. Positive korr
- Page 15 and 16:
- Background and aim - systems and
- Page 18:
- Outline of this thesis - OUTLINE
- Page 21 and 22:
- How does group housing vary in pr
- Page 23 and 24:
- How does group housing vary in pr
- Page 26 and 27:
- Paper I - Effect of energy intake
- Page 28 and 29:
- Paper I - 1. Introduction The num
- Page 30 and 31:
- Paper I - Therefore, the aim of t
- Page 32 and 33: Refer ence Table 1. Effect of energ
- Page 34 and 35: - Paper I - Therefore, low energy s
- Page 36 and 37: Table 2. Effect of energy intake in
- Page 38 and 39: - Paper I - However, this does not
- Page 40 and 41: Table 3. Effect of energy intake in
- Page 42 and 43: - Paper I - Feeding sows 16, 27 or
- Page 44 and 45: - Paper I - gonadotrophins (LH, FSH
- Page 46 and 47: - Paper I - the first four weeks af
- Page 48 and 49: - Paper I - Cosgrove, J.R., Foxcrof
- Page 50 and 51: - Paper I - Matschke, G.H., 1964. T
- Page 52: - Paper I - Tribble, L.F., Orr, D.E
- Page 55 and 56: - Paper III - Indicators of feed in
- Page 57 and 58: - Paper III - 1. Introduction The n
- Page 59 and 60: Table 1. Applied feeding and housin
- Page 61 and 62: - Paper III - performed. The sow ha
- Page 63 and 64: - Paper III - proximately three wee
- Page 65 and 66: - Paper III - Table 3. Overall mean
- Page 67 and 68: Table 5. Correlations between all c
- Page 69 and 70: Back fat W, mm Back fat gain, AM-F,
- Page 71 and 72: - Paper III - from three weeks afte
- Page 73 and 74: - Paper III - Number of skin lesion
- Page 75 and 76: - Paper III - In herds practising g
- Page 77 and 78: - Paper III - Previous work have fo
- Page 79 and 80: References - Paper III - Andersen,
- Page 81: - Paper III - Kongsted, A.G. 2004a.
- Page 85 and 86: - Paper IV - 1. Introduction Group
- Page 87 and 88: - Paper IV - ing compared to number
- Page 89 and 90: - Paper IV - mixed model using the
- Page 91 and 92: Table 2. Estimates and standard err
- Page 93 and 94: - Paper IV - cial effect on high ra
- Page 95 and 96: References - Paper IV - Aherne, F.X
- Page 97 and 98: - Paper IV - Olsson, A.-C., Svendse
- Page 99 and 100: - General discussion - GENERAL DISC
- Page 101 and 102: - General discussion - However, an
- Page 103 and 104: References - General discussion - A
- Page 105 and 106: - Conclusions - 6. CONCLUSIONS Two
- Page 107 and 108: - Appendix 1 - APPENDIX 1 LITTER SI
- Page 109 and 110: - Appendix 1 - they are mature i.e.
- Page 111 and 112: - Appendix 1 - Soon after ovulation
- Page 113 and 114: - Appendix 1 - Crombie, P.L., 1970.
- Page 115: - Appendix 1 - Scott, M.A., 2000. A
Change language