29.07.2013 Views

Reproduction performances and conditions of group-housed non ...

Reproduction performances and conditions of group-housed non ...

Reproduction performances and conditions of group-housed non ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- Paper III -<br />

between the 14 herds. As system differences previously have shown to influence the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> human approach tests (Marchant-Forde et al., 2003), the between-herd variation should<br />

be interpreted with caution.<br />

For managers <strong>of</strong> herds with <strong>group</strong> <strong>housed</strong> sows, information <strong>of</strong> the sows' condition would<br />

be very useful in relation to analysing <strong>and</strong> improving animal welfare <strong>and</strong> perhaps also productivity.<br />

Since it is likely that the sows’ general condition, to a large extent is influenced<br />

by management related factors, it may be difficult to predict the presence <strong>of</strong> e.g. stress, fear<br />

<strong>and</strong> unequal feed intake merely on the knowledge <strong>of</strong> layout related factors like feeding system<br />

<strong>and</strong> escape possibilities. Therefore, it seems important that managers are able to make<br />

an on site judgement <strong>of</strong> the sows’ condition. The indicators presented in this paper are possible<br />

to perform in practice, <strong>and</strong> taken together the results indicate that they could be relevant<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> social stress, fear <strong>and</strong> feed intake. As a consequence, these indicators<br />

might be relevant ingredients <strong>of</strong> a management tool to analyse <strong>and</strong> improve the welfare <strong>and</strong><br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>group</strong> <strong>housed</strong> sows.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The authors wish to thank the participating farmers <strong>and</strong> the technicians Henrik K. Andersen,<br />

Kristine R. Hansen, Michael Hansen, Orla Nielsen, Niels H. Thomsen, <strong>and</strong> Helge Yde<br />

for their much appreciated assistance in carrying out the data collection. The authors also<br />

wish to express their gratitude to Erik Jørgensen for valuable contributions to the statistical<br />

analyses.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!