- Paper I - the first four weeks after mating could perhaps impair pregnancy rate in gilts <strong>and</strong> litter size in sows fed restricted during lactation. As regards before mating, it is not possible to say how huge impact the involvement in aggressive interactions has on a sow’s appetite <strong>and</strong> therefore whether variation in feed intake can influence the variation in litter size <strong>and</strong> pregnancy rate. Further studies are needed to clarify this. 6. Conclusion Based upon a review <strong>of</strong> existing literature, it is suggested that pregnancy rate <strong>and</strong> litter size can be influenced by energy intake although the results reviewed do not provide a clear picture. There is little doubt, however, that the reproduction performance <strong>of</strong> the gilt, in general, is more influenced by energy supply than the reproduction performance <strong>of</strong> the sow. It is further suggested that variation in feed intake in a <strong>group</strong> <strong>of</strong> restricted fed pregnant female pigs in commercial pig husb<strong>and</strong>ry, may be large enough to influence pregnancy rate <strong>and</strong> litter size. However, there is no empiricism to support this, why there is a need for studies analyzing whether a relation between individual feed intake <strong>and</strong> reproduction performance exists in a <strong>group</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>non</strong>-lactating female pigs. 41
7. References - Paper I - Allrich, R.D., Tilton, J.E., Johnson, J.N., Slanger, W.D., Marchello, M.J., 1979. Effect <strong>of</strong> lactation length <strong>and</strong> fasting on various reproductive phenomena <strong>of</strong> sows. J. Anim. Sci. 48, 359-362. Almeida, F.R.C.L., Kirkwood, R.N., Aherne, F.X., Foxcr<strong>of</strong>t, G.R., 2000. Consquences <strong>of</strong> different patterns <strong>of</strong> feed intake during the estrous cycle in gilts on subsequent fertility. J. Anim. Sci. 78, 1556-1563. Andersen, I.L., Bøe, K., Kristiansen, A.L., 1999. The influence <strong>of</strong> different feeding arrangements <strong>and</strong> food type on competition at feeding in pregnant sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65, 91-104. Anderson, L.L., 1975. Embryonic <strong>and</strong> placental development during prolonged inanition in the pig. Am. J. Physiol. 229, 1687-1694. Arey, D., Edwards, S.A., 1998. Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing <strong>and</strong> the concequences for welfare <strong>and</strong> production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 56, 61-70. Ashworth, C.J., Antipatis, C., 1999. Effect <strong>of</strong> pre- <strong>and</strong> post-mating nutrtion on embryo survival in gilts. Reproduc. Dom. Anim. 34, 103-108. Baidoo, S.K., Aherne, F.X., Kirkwood, R.N., Foxcr<strong>of</strong>t, G.R., 1992. Effect <strong>of</strong> feed intake during lactation <strong>and</strong> after weaning on sow reproductive performance. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 91-917. Barnett, J.L., Cronin, G.M., Winfield, C.G., 1981. The effects <strong>of</strong> individual <strong>and</strong> <strong>group</strong> penning <strong>of</strong> pigs on total <strong>and</strong> free plasma corticosteroids <strong>and</strong> the maximum corticosteroid binding capacity. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 44, 219-225. Bates, R.O., Edwards, D. B., Korthals, R.L., 2003. Sow performance when <strong>housed</strong> either in <strong>group</strong>s with electronic sow feeder or stalls. Livest. Prod. Sci. 79, 29-35. Baustad, B., Lium, B., 2002. Helse og dyrevelferd i norsk svineproduksjon sett i et internasjonalt perspektiv. Norsk Vet. tidsskrift 114, 87-91. Beltranena, E., Foxcr<strong>of</strong>t, G.R., Aherne, F.X., Kirkwood, R.N., 1991. Endocrinology <strong>of</strong> nutritional flushing in gilts. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71, 1063-1071. Brouns, F., Edwards, S.A., 1992. Future prospects for housing <strong>of</strong> <strong>non</strong>-lactating sows. Pig News <strong>and</strong> Inform. 13, 47-50. Brouns, F., Edwards, S.A., 1994. Social rank <strong>and</strong> feeding behaviour <strong>of</strong> <strong>group</strong>-<strong>housed</strong> sows fed competitively or ad libitum. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39, 225-235. Brouns, F., Edwards, S.A., English, P.R., 1991. Fibrous raw materials in sow diets: Effects on voluntary food intake, digestibility <strong>and</strong> diurnal activity patterns. Anim. Prod. 52, 598. Cassar, G., King, G.J., 1992. Effect <strong>of</strong> high energy feeding after mating on developmental uniformity <strong>and</strong> survival <strong>of</strong> porcine conceptuses. J. Anim. Sci. 70 (suppl. 1), 266. 42
- Page 1 and 2: Reproduction performances and condi
- Page 4: Contents Summary………………
- Page 7 and 8: Paper II - Summary - A review of 15
- Page 10 and 11: - Sammendrag - SAMMENDRAG Antallet
- Page 12: - Sammendrag - søgt. Positive korr
- Page 15 and 16: - Background and aim - systems and
- Page 18: - Outline of this thesis - OUTLINE
- Page 21 and 22: - How does group housing vary in pr
- Page 23 and 24: - How does group housing vary in pr
- Page 26 and 27: - Paper I - Effect of energy intake
- Page 28 and 29: - Paper I - 1. Introduction The num
- Page 30 and 31: - Paper I - Therefore, the aim of t
- Page 32 and 33: Refer ence Table 1. Effect of energ
- Page 34 and 35: - Paper I - Therefore, low energy s
- Page 36 and 37: Table 2. Effect of energy intake in
- Page 38 and 39: - Paper I - However, this does not
- Page 40 and 41: Table 3. Effect of energy intake in
- Page 42 and 43: - Paper I - Feeding sows 16, 27 or
- Page 44 and 45: - Paper I - gonadotrophins (LH, FSH
- Page 48 and 49: - Paper I - Cosgrove, J.R., Foxcrof
- Page 50 and 51: - Paper I - Matschke, G.H., 1964. T
- Page 52: - Paper I - Tribble, L.F., Orr, D.E
- Page 55 and 56: - Paper III - Indicators of feed in
- Page 57 and 58: - Paper III - 1. Introduction The n
- Page 59 and 60: Table 1. Applied feeding and housin
- Page 61 and 62: - Paper III - performed. The sow ha
- Page 63 and 64: - Paper III - proximately three wee
- Page 65 and 66: - Paper III - Table 3. Overall mean
- Page 67 and 68: Table 5. Correlations between all c
- Page 69 and 70: Back fat W, mm Back fat gain, AM-F,
- Page 71 and 72: - Paper III - from three weeks afte
- Page 73 and 74: - Paper III - Number of skin lesion
- Page 75 and 76: - Paper III - In herds practising g
- Page 77 and 78: - Paper III - Previous work have fo
- Page 79 and 80: References - Paper III - Andersen,
- Page 81 and 82: - Paper III - Kongsted, A.G. 2004a.
- Page 83 and 84: - Paper IV - Relation between repro
- Page 85 and 86: - Paper IV - 1. Introduction Group
- Page 87 and 88: - Paper IV - ing compared to number
- Page 89 and 90: - Paper IV - mixed model using the
- Page 91 and 92: Table 2. Estimates and standard err
- Page 93 and 94: - Paper IV - cial effect on high ra
- Page 95 and 96: References - Paper IV - Aherne, F.X
- Page 97 and 98:
- Paper IV - Olsson, A.-C., Svendse
- Page 99 and 100:
- General discussion - GENERAL DISC
- Page 101 and 102:
- General discussion - However, an
- Page 103 and 104:
References - General discussion - A
- Page 105 and 106:
- Conclusions - 6. CONCLUSIONS Two
- Page 107 and 108:
- Appendix 1 - APPENDIX 1 LITTER SI
- Page 109 and 110:
- Appendix 1 - they are mature i.e.
- Page 111 and 112:
- Appendix 1 - Soon after ovulation
- Page 113 and 114:
- Appendix 1 - Crombie, P.L., 1970.
- Page 115:
- Appendix 1 - Scott, M.A., 2000. A