- Appendix 1 - Hunter, R.H.F., 1990. Fertilization <strong>of</strong> pig eggs in vivo <strong>and</strong> in vitro. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Reproduction</strong> <strong>and</strong> Fertility, Suppl. 40, 211-226. Kemp, B., Soede, N.M., 1997. Consequences <strong>of</strong> variation in interval from insemination to ovulation on fertili- zation in pigs. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Reproduction</strong> <strong>and</strong> Fertility, Suppl. 52, 79-89. Langendijk, P. 2001. Is there af future for the boar? The role <strong>of</strong> boar stimuli in reproductive processes around estrus in the pig. Ph.d. Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Sciences, Wageningen Institute <strong>of</strong> Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. Maddox-Hyttel, P., 2003. Befrugtningens indre univers. L<strong>and</strong>sudvalget for Svin, Danske slagterier. Reproduktionsseminar 13-03-2003. Pp 1-9. Nissen, A.K., Soede, N.M., Hyttel, P., Schmidt, M., D'Hoore, L., 1997. The influence <strong>of</strong> time <strong>of</strong> insemination relative to time <strong>of</strong> ovulation on farrowing frequency <strong>and</strong> litter size in sows, as investigated by ultra- sonography. Theriogenology 47, 1571-1582. Olsson, A.-C., Svendsen, J., 1997a. Effekter av olika konkurrensförhåll<strong>and</strong>en vid utfodring på suggors hälsa och produktion. SLU Rapport 113, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, 37pp. Olsson, A.-C., Svendsen, J., 1997b. The importance <strong>of</strong> familiarity when <strong>group</strong>ing gilts, <strong>and</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> fre- quent <strong>group</strong>ing during gestation. Swedish J. agric. Res. 27, 33-43. Pedersen, L.J., Rojkittikhun, T., Einarsson, S., Edqvist, L.-E., 1993. Postweaning <strong>group</strong>ed sows: effects <strong>of</strong> aggression on hormonal patterns <strong>and</strong> oestrous behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38, 25- 39. Pedersen, P.N., Navnt<strong>of</strong>t, D., 1996. Brunstforhold hos søer. Erfaring 9602, Den rullende Afprøvning, L<strong>and</strong>sudvalget for Svin, Danske Slagterier, 6pp. Peltoniemi, O.A.T., Easton, B.G., Love, R.J., Klupiec, C., Evans, G., 1995. Effect <strong>of</strong> chronic treatment with a GnRH agonist (Goserelin) on LH secretion <strong>and</strong> early pregnancy in gilts. Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong> Science 40, 121-133. Peltoniemi, O.A.T., Tast, A., Love, R.J., 2000. Factors affecting reproduction in the pig: seasonal effects <strong>and</strong> restricted feeding <strong>of</strong> the pregnant ilt <strong>and</strong> sow. Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong> Science 60, 173-184. Pope, W.F., First, N.L., 1985. Factors affecting the survival <strong>of</strong> pig embryos. Theriogenology 23[1], 91-105. Prunier, A., Quesnel, H., 2000. Nutritional influences on the hormonal control <strong>of</strong> reproduction in female pigs. Livestock Production Science 63, 1-16. Razdan, P., Mwanza, A.M., Kindahl, H., Rodriguez-Martinez, H., Hultén, F., Einarsson, S., 2002. Effect <strong>of</strong> repeated ACTH-stimulation on early embryonic development <strong>and</strong> hormonal pr<strong>of</strong>iles in sows. Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong> Science 70, 127-137. Rodriguez-Martinez, H., Tienthai, P., Suzuki, K., Funahashi, H., Ekwall, H., Johannisson, A., 2001. Involvement <strong>of</strong> oviduct in sperm capacitation <strong>and</strong> oocyte development in pigs. <strong>Reproduction</strong> Supplement 58, 129-145. 118
- Appendix 1 - Scott, M.A., 2000. A glimpse at sperm function in vivo: sperm transport <strong>and</strong> epithelial interaction in the fe- male reproduction tract. Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong> Science 60-61[337], 348. Soede, N.M., 1993. Boar stimuli around insemination affect reproductive processes in pigs: a review. Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong> Science 32, 107-125. Strob<strong>and</strong>, H.W.J., van der Lende, T., 1990. Embryonic <strong>and</strong> uterine development during early pregnancy in pigs. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Reproduction</strong> <strong>and</strong> Fertility, Suppl. 40, 261-277. Tsuma, V.T., Einarsson, S., Madej, A., Kindahl, H., Lundeheim, N., Rojkittikhun, T., 1996. Endocrine chan- ges during <strong>group</strong> housing <strong>of</strong> primaparous sows in early pregnancy. Acta vet. Sc<strong>and</strong>. 37, 481-490. Turner, A.I., Hemsworth, P.H., Tilbrook, A.J., 2002. Susceptibility <strong>of</strong> reproduction in female pigs to impair- ment by stress <strong>and</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> the hypothalamo-pituitary axis. Reproduc. Fertil. Dev. 14, 377-391. van der Lende, T. 1989. Impact <strong>of</strong> early pregnancy on prenatal development in the pig. Ph.D. Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Husb<strong>and</strong>ry, Wageningen University. van der Lende, T., Soede, N.M., Kemp, B.V., 1994. Embryo mortality <strong>and</strong> prolificacy in the pig. In: Cole, D. J. A., Wiseman, J., Varley, M. A. (Eds.), Principles <strong>of</strong> pig science. Nothingham University Press,pp. 297-317. 119
- Page 1 and 2:
Reproduction performances and condi
- Page 4:
Contents Summary………………
- Page 7 and 8:
Paper II - Summary - A review of 15
- Page 10 and 11:
- Sammendrag - SAMMENDRAG Antallet
- Page 12:
- Sammendrag - søgt. Positive korr
- Page 15 and 16:
- Background and aim - systems and
- Page 18:
- Outline of this thesis - OUTLINE
- Page 21 and 22:
- How does group housing vary in pr
- Page 23 and 24:
- How does group housing vary in pr
- Page 26 and 27:
- Paper I - Effect of energy intake
- Page 28 and 29:
- Paper I - 1. Introduction The num
- Page 30 and 31:
- Paper I - Therefore, the aim of t
- Page 32 and 33:
Refer ence Table 1. Effect of energ
- Page 34 and 35:
- Paper I - Therefore, low energy s
- Page 36 and 37:
Table 2. Effect of energy intake in
- Page 38 and 39:
- Paper I - However, this does not
- Page 40 and 41:
Table 3. Effect of energy intake in
- Page 42 and 43:
- Paper I - Feeding sows 16, 27 or
- Page 44 and 45:
- Paper I - gonadotrophins (LH, FSH
- Page 46 and 47:
- Paper I - the first four weeks af
- Page 48 and 49:
- Paper I - Cosgrove, J.R., Foxcrof
- Page 50 and 51:
- Paper I - Matschke, G.H., 1964. T
- Page 52:
- Paper I - Tribble, L.F., Orr, D.E
- Page 55 and 56:
- Paper III - Indicators of feed in
- Page 57 and 58:
- Paper III - 1. Introduction The n
- Page 59 and 60:
Table 1. Applied feeding and housin
- Page 61 and 62:
- Paper III - performed. The sow ha
- Page 63 and 64: - Paper III - proximately three wee
- Page 65 and 66: - Paper III - Table 3. Overall mean
- Page 67 and 68: Table 5. Correlations between all c
- Page 69 and 70: Back fat W, mm Back fat gain, AM-F,
- Page 71 and 72: - Paper III - from three weeks afte
- Page 73 and 74: - Paper III - Number of skin lesion
- Page 75 and 76: - Paper III - In herds practising g
- Page 77 and 78: - Paper III - Previous work have fo
- Page 79 and 80: References - Paper III - Andersen,
- Page 81 and 82: - Paper III - Kongsted, A.G. 2004a.
- Page 83 and 84: - Paper IV - Relation between repro
- Page 85 and 86: - Paper IV - 1. Introduction Group
- Page 87 and 88: - Paper IV - ing compared to number
- Page 89 and 90: - Paper IV - mixed model using the
- Page 91 and 92: Table 2. Estimates and standard err
- Page 93 and 94: - Paper IV - cial effect on high ra
- Page 95 and 96: References - Paper IV - Aherne, F.X
- Page 97 and 98: - Paper IV - Olsson, A.-C., Svendse
- Page 99 and 100: - General discussion - GENERAL DISC
- Page 101 and 102: - General discussion - However, an
- Page 103 and 104: References - General discussion - A
- Page 105 and 106: - Conclusions - 6. CONCLUSIONS Two
- Page 107 and 108: - Appendix 1 - APPENDIX 1 LITTER SI
- Page 109 and 110: - Appendix 1 - they are mature i.e.
- Page 111 and 112: - Appendix 1 - Soon after ovulation
- Page 113: - Appendix 1 - Crombie, P.L., 1970.
Change language