29.07.2013 Views

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

egg album<strong>in</strong> (71%). However, the diets were supplemented with Ca carbonate <strong>in</strong> amounts of 0.5% and 1.18%,<br />

respectively. The diets therefore had high Ca/P ratios (especially egg album<strong>in</strong> diet), which likely decreas ed P<br />

absorption or availability. The large difference <strong>in</strong> estimated P availability of soybean meal between the two studies<br />

may be due to different Ca contents of the diets s<strong>in</strong>ce free phytate (phytic acid) and calcium-phytat e (phyt<strong>in</strong>) are<br />

different <strong>in</strong> bioavailability. S<strong>in</strong>ce Bruce & Callow (1934), many workers reported <strong>in</strong> various species that Ca<br />

<strong>in</strong>terferes with the utilization of phytate P by form<strong>in</strong>g Ca-phytate precipitate <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e. If phytate stays <strong>in</strong> the<br />

soluble fraction <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e, it can be digested by bacterial, dietary, and/or endogenous phytases. Apparently,<br />

the diet used by Lovell (1978) conta<strong>in</strong>ed little Ca s<strong>in</strong>ce this researcher used a Ca-P-free m<strong>in</strong>eral mixture, whereas<br />

Wilson et al. (1982) used a diet conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a substantial amount of Ca as Ca carbonate and Ca lactate, which was (<strong>in</strong><br />

my calculation) capable to precipitate as much as 0.47% phytate-P <strong>in</strong> the diet. Taylor (1965) wrote, "Phytate-P is<br />

by no means completely undigested <strong>in</strong> the rat, dog, pig and hen under appropriate conditions, and it appears that the<br />

extent of phytate breakdown <strong>in</strong> the gut is reduced as the level of dietary Ca <strong>in</strong>creases." (see section “Precipitation<br />

of calcium phytate”) It should be noted that about 60% of phytate <strong>in</strong> soybean meal are water-soluble and easily<br />

removed by wash<strong>in</strong>g (Han 1988). Any portion of dietary phytate that leaches out from the pellets before be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>gested by the fish therefore will be calculated as "digestible". Also, the leach<strong>in</strong>g loss of phytate from feces will<br />

be accounted for as "digested". The degree of thes e sources of error depends on water stability of the pellets, fish<br />

size (pellet size), palatability, feed<strong>in</strong>g level, feed<strong>in</strong>g method, fecal collection method, and the content of cations <strong>in</strong><br />

the diet. Both Lovell (1978) and Wilson et al. (1982) collected fecal samples by dissection; however, the former<br />

apparently fed the diet manually, while the latter force-fed the diet. Li et al. (1996) compared bioavailability of P<br />

<strong>in</strong> feed-grade dicalcium phosphate and 3 defluor<strong>in</strong>ated rock phosphates of high, midium and low solubilities <strong>in</strong><br />

neutral ammonium citrate. Channel catfish (body wt. ca.4 g) were fed <strong>in</strong> aquaria for 12 weeks with egg<br />

album<strong>in</strong>-based puri fied diets conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g one of the test P sources. Based on weight ga<strong>in</strong>, feed consumption, feed<br />

conversion ratio, bone ash and P levels, they reported that all the test P sources had comparable bioavailability for<br />

channel cat fish. Eya & Lovell (1997) determ<strong>in</strong>ed P availability of various P supplements for channel cat fish based<br />

on absorption (digestion). They used a non-purified diet conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soybean meal as the basal diet rather than<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a purified low-P diet. The authors subtracted P absorbed from the basal diet portion of the test diet to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e the amount of P absorbed from the test P source. This method is acceptable i f <strong>in</strong>teraction is negligible.<br />

The calculated values are the true absorption (availability) although the authors called the values net absorption<br />

(which normally refers to as apparent absorption). The authors added CaCO 3 to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> 1/1 Ca/P ratio <strong>in</strong> all diets.<br />

The values could have been higher if the diets were low <strong>in</strong> Ca.<br />

P availability <strong>in</strong> Tilapia<br />

Viola et al. (1986b) reported, <strong>in</strong> tilapia, that P <strong>in</strong> various fish meals was highly available, soybean P was poorly<br />

available, and sorghum P was superior to wheat P. They noted that fast grow<strong>in</strong>g fish need more P than slow<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g fish.<br />

P availability <strong>in</strong> Other fishes<br />

In red sea bream, Sakamoto & Yone (1979) reported that sodium phosphates (mono-, di-, and tribasic), potassium<br />

phosphate monobasic, and Ca phosphate monobasic were more effective than Ca phosphates (di- and tribasic) to<br />

prevent the development of P deficiency. Ca phytate was poorly utilized by the fish as a P source. Yone &<br />

Toshima (1979) showed that the digestibility of P <strong>in</strong> fish meal was higher <strong>in</strong> seabream than <strong>in</strong> carp. Carp fed fish<br />

meal diet grew poorly with very low feed effi ciency, which was improved by supplement<strong>in</strong>g the diet with available P.<br />

Fernandez et al. (1996) studied the absorption of C, N, P and dry matter along the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e of gilthead seabream,<br />

and compared di fferent fecal collection methods to estimate apparent digestibility coeffi cients. Fernandez et al.<br />

(1998) determ<strong>in</strong>ed aga<strong>in</strong> the apparent digestibility from several regions of the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e of gilthead seabream (body<br />

wt 10-25 g). Except for P, the apparent absorption <strong>in</strong>creased along the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e. High correlations were found<br />

between N, C and DM digestibilities, whereas P digestibility showed low or no correlation. Silva & Oliva-Teles<br />

(1998) determ<strong>in</strong>ed the apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter, prote<strong>in</strong>, energy and P <strong>in</strong> two fish meals, a fish<br />

prote<strong>in</strong> hydrolysate, blood meal, meat meal, soybean meal and yellow dextr<strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g seabass (body wt 40 g). The<br />

optimal <strong>in</strong>clusion level of a test feedstuff <strong>in</strong>to the reference diet <strong>in</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g the apparent digestibility was also<br />

studied (15 and 30%). Satoh et al. (1998) reported that fish meal-bas ed diet conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g total P at the level of 2.1%<br />

did not provide optimum growth of red seabream (body wt., <strong>in</strong>itial 2.4 g, f<strong>in</strong>al 23 g vs. 30 g), and concluded that<br />

supplement<strong>in</strong>g the diet with available P was necessary. The fish fed the low-P diet, however, had similar or higher<br />

© 2000, 2005. Shozo H. Sugiura. All rights reserved.<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!