Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition
Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition
Review: Phosphorus in Fish Nutrition
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>in</strong>creas e ur<strong>in</strong>ary P. Bol<strong>in</strong>g et al. (2000) reported that both citric acid and sodium citrate (6%/diet) markedly<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas ed bone density, weight ga<strong>in</strong> and feed <strong>in</strong>take (but not feed efficiency) of chicks fed P-defi cient corn-soybean<br />
diet. The effect was absent with phytate-free (case<strong>in</strong>-dextrose) diet. Conversely, pigs fed P-deficient<br />
corn-soybean diet <strong>in</strong>creas ed neither bone density nor weight ga<strong>in</strong> by dietary addition of citric acid; but greatly<br />
improved feed effi ciency (ga<strong>in</strong>/feed). Many researchers have postulated modes of action of citric acid or citrates<br />
on phytate-P utilization. Based on available evidence, they argue that dietary citrates have an effect to chelate Ca<br />
<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al lumen and prevent precipitation of phytate-P (discussed <strong>in</strong> Bol<strong>in</strong>g et al. 2000a; see sections<br />
“Mellanby’s toxam<strong>in</strong>” and “ Availability of phytate-P”). Ca-phytate is resistant to phytase hydrolysis, while soluble<br />
phytates (phytic acid and sodium salts) are digestible by phytase (endogenous, bacterial and <strong>in</strong>gredient-derived).<br />
Therefore, as Bol<strong>in</strong>g et al. (2000b) demonstrated, when a diet is high <strong>in</strong> Ca content, <strong>in</strong> the amount that overwhelms<br />
the chelat<strong>in</strong>g capacity of citrates, then dietary addition of citrates has no effect on phytate-P utilization.<br />
A recent study <strong>in</strong>dicates that dietary acidification (with <strong>in</strong>organic acid) <strong>in</strong>hibits gastric H+/K+ ATPase<br />
(proton pump) and sodium bicarbonate cotransporter gene expressions <strong>in</strong> corpus stomach of ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout. This<br />
suggests that gastric acid secretion may be down-regulated by dietary exogenous acid <strong>in</strong>take by some feed-back loop<br />
mechanism, which <strong>in</strong>volves not only decreased proton secretion <strong>in</strong>to the gastric lumen, but also correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
decrease of basolat eral bicarbonate exit (from the oxynticopeptic cells), lead<strong>in</strong>g to a deficit of bicarbonate needed<br />
for gastric mucous cells as well as for neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g gastric chyme <strong>in</strong> the duodenum or pyloric ceaca. Thus, the<br />
<strong>in</strong>hibition of proton pump by dietary <strong>in</strong>organic acids could lead to an acid-base imbalance. Dietary acetic acid,<br />
however, seems to be neutral <strong>in</strong> this regard.<br />
In vitro estimation of P availability<br />
Some earlier workers <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g field apparently used simple laboratory techniques that could estimate P<br />
"assimilability" of rock phosphates that was to be used as P supplements for animal feed (Raynolds et al. 1944).<br />
The supply of bone meal, which was a common P supplement for animal feeds, was rather limited <strong>in</strong> those days.<br />
The methods they used to evaluate the biological value of P <strong>in</strong> rock phosphates were based on the solubility of P <strong>in</strong><br />
dilute hydrochloric acid with<strong>in</strong> the range of concentrations found <strong>in</strong> the stomach of animals. Reynolds et al.<br />
(1944) and Hill et al. (1945) appears to be the first to conduct extensive <strong>in</strong>vestigations to estimate P availability <strong>in</strong><br />
various P supplements based on their solubility <strong>in</strong> dilute hydrochloric acid and other solvents. Gillis et al. (1948)<br />
studied 19 P compounds <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong> vivo chick bioassay (at 0.4% and 0.8% levels), and an <strong>in</strong> vitro 0.4%-HCl solubility<br />
test. Correlations between <strong>in</strong> vitro and <strong>in</strong> vivo assays were low, which was probably because the study <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
varieties of metaphosphates, pyrophosphates, phytate-phosphate and <strong>in</strong>organic orthophosphates. Also, Day et al.<br />
(1973) compared bioavailability of P compounds for chicks by an <strong>in</strong> vivo bone-ash assay and by <strong>in</strong> vitro solubility<br />
tests us<strong>in</strong>g 0.4% HCl, 2% citric acid and neutral ammonium citrate. Satoh et al. (1986) and Sh<strong>in</strong>ma (1989)<br />
reported <strong>in</strong> vitro methods for estimat<strong>in</strong>g phosphorus availability <strong>in</strong> various feed <strong>in</strong>gredi ents and commercial feeds<br />
for fish based on differential solubility fractionation us<strong>in</strong>g distilled water, 80% acetic acid, and 0.9% hydrochloric<br />
acid as the solvents. They noted that carp could utilize water-soluble fraction of dietary P, but trout could utilize all<br />
three fractions of dietary P. Satoh et al. (1992) and Satoh et al. (1997) reported an <strong>in</strong> vitro technique to estimate<br />
available P content <strong>in</strong> semi-purified diets, practical diets and commercial diets for carp and ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout. The<br />
values agreed well with those determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> vivo feed<strong>in</strong>g (digestibility) trials. Deionized water, 80% actic acid<br />
and 0.25M-HCl were used to extract phosphorus from the test<strong>in</strong>g materials. The extracted solutions were digested<br />
with nitric-perchloric acid mixture. The authors did not discuss about the <strong>in</strong>terference of phytate-P, which is highly<br />
soluble <strong>in</strong> water and even more soluble <strong>in</strong> dilute acid (Jordan et al. 1906, Han 1988), but not available to fish.<br />
Jahan et al. (2000) from the same laboratory also reported that the <strong>in</strong> vitro (solubility test) and <strong>in</strong> vivo (digestibility<br />
trials) data of estimated P availability were <strong>in</strong> close agreement; however, the P-retention by the fish (determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from body P content) was much lower than the digestibility or solubility data even <strong>in</strong> the group of fish fed a<br />
P-deficient diet. The authors expla<strong>in</strong>ed, "In this experiment, 61.6-70.5% of absorbed P was reta<strong>in</strong>ed and the rest of<br />
29.5 to 38.4% was probably returned <strong>in</strong>to the digestive tract as observed <strong>in</strong> mammals or excreted through gills and<br />
ur<strong>in</strong>e. . . . Furthermore, experiments will be needed to clarify the dest<strong>in</strong>y of absorbed P <strong>in</strong> fish." The "absorbed P"<br />
may <strong>in</strong>clude absorbed P by the fish, dissolved dietary P that was lost while the small carp was chew<strong>in</strong>g the pellets,<br />
and any soluble P <strong>in</strong> feces that was lost before fecal collection. The excretion of endogenous (absorbed) P back<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the digestive tract may not be a significant source of error <strong>in</strong> fish (thus, apparent availability of certa<strong>in</strong> P<br />
compounds can be close to 100% <strong>in</strong> fish even at high dietary levels). The apparent digestibility, which <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
endogenous P, does not expla<strong>in</strong> the difference. Also, P-deficient fish do not excrete 33% of absorbed P via gills<br />
and ur<strong>in</strong>e. Spencer et al. (2000) estimated bioavailability of P <strong>in</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ary and low-phytate corn based on peptic<br />
and pancreat<strong>in</strong> digestion methods <strong>in</strong> vitro, and obta<strong>in</strong>ed similar values to those determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> vivo.<br />
© 2000, 2005. Shozo H. Sugiura. All rights reserved.<br />
41